I turned Claude into my Chief of Investments.
One of my favorite things about this system is the personal context layer.
Most people prompt Claude for stock advice and get generic answers because Claude knows nothing about them.
This fixes that entirely - here's how:
I built a folder with 5 files that give Claude full context on me as an investor:
→ Investor-profile.md: my experience, goals, time horizon, risk tolerance, portfolio size
→ Strategy.md: my max drawdown tolerance, rebalancing rules, position sizing, entry/exit criteria
→ Portfolio.csv: my current positions and weightings
→ Watchlist.md: sectors, tickers, and potential setups I'm tracking
→ Prompts.md: my saved prompts so I'm not rewriting the same thing every session
Once this folder is attached inside a Cowork project, connected to live market data through the FMP connector, every single response Claude gives is filtered through my actual thesis and goals, not generic advice.
If I include my ideal trading setups in Strategy.md, Claude will scan live price data and tell me if a trade is actually forming based on my own criteria, and exactly how I'd size into it.
Setup takes under 5 minutes once you have the files ready.
Full step-by-step in the article, including how to connect FMP and automate the whole thing with scheduled loops:
Anthropic engineer:
“90% of our engineers were using self‑improving loops. Now everyone shifted to building agentic Graphs"
"No more prompting”
In 10 minutes she shows her full Claude Code setup and workflow live, from a blank terminal.
Worth more than a $500 agentic course.
Watch this video, then save the article below on how to become a graph architect👇
el ingeniero que construyó Claude Code acaba de publicar un video de 28 minutos sobre cómo escribir prompts que realmente funcionan
he visto cursos de 300$ que no cubren lo que él muestra en los primeros 10 minutos
archivos CLAUDE.md, atajos de memoria, sesiones paralelas, patrones de prompting
todo en un video y completamente gratis
funciona seas desarrollador, principiante o alguien que lleva meses usando Claude
My theory on "non-binary" identities:
Some women have extremely low self-esteem, which leads to them being uncomfortable with the idea of femininity. And after all, if women are supposed to be feminine beautiful, but they're not feminine & don't *feel* beautiful, they must not be women.
So they reject womanhood in favor of a more neutral label. "Non-binary." Now they don't have to deal with the associations or expectations of being a woman OR a man.
As someone who has struggled with self-esteem and body image, I understand the thought process and inclinations.
However, being a woman or man isn't something you feel or perform. It's just what you are. Putting on a suit doesn't make you a different gender.
I feel for people like Bella Ramsey, but the truth is young women not being comfortable in their own skin is nothing new or revolutionary.