Introducing, QINFI – the Quantum-secure super app! 📱
One interface. Infinite financial primitives.
From banking to trading to tokenisation of real-world assets – it offers composable, chain-aware finance under one roof.
https://t.co/Kly84tftYA
@Lexur showing the liquidation and the -$250 right next to the volume is the right call 🙌 most points leaderboards bury both.
harder problem: $50K of that $61K is one trade. same lifetime number could be one position or fifty. does the profile surface concentration, not just totals?
@repetny the RFQ framing is the sharp part. skipping the LST wrapper means your exit price is a live quote, not a fixed fee. in calm markets competition beats a flat rate. the tradeoff worth watching: quotes widen exactly when everyone wants out at once. clean design either way.
@SolanaSensei@solana@toly@SolanaFndn@Raydium@JupiterExchange@orca_so@Titan_Exchange solana genuinely leading both is the headline.
the quieter signal: it leads DEX volume ~2x but app revenue only slightly, and hyperliquid earns nearly as much on far less volume. volume is the flex, revenue per unit of volume is the harder game. good problem to have at #1 😎
@beincrypto the interesting design problem in sports markets isn't volume, it's resolution. politics resolves once. a world cup is hundreds of nested markets settling live in 90-minute windows.
the UX that wins is whoever makes fast, legible settlement feel trustworthy under load.
@MarinadeFinance clean milestone. but instant unstake doesn't remove the ~2-day cooldown, a liquidity pool absorbs it and the fee is the price. that fee scales with how drained the pool is. so median 0.152% is the calm-water number. what matters is what it hit on the worst day.
the tell is 'security entitlement' (in the disclaimer). that's an intermediated claim, not bearer ownership. an SEC-registered transfer agent stays the authority, public chain or not. so it's a controllable asset, not a permissionless one.
the design job: a wallet that never blurs the two.
@tryscouthub nice pattern ✨
the real risk isn't the toggle, it's what's in the capture. your own demo shot has an investor update with live MRR in it. a bug report shouldn't mean shipping financials to your team.
does the preview let people catch and redact that before submit? 🤔
@blknoiz06 the cleanest AI-to-crypto transfer isn't trading models, it's agents that transact onchain.
the unsolved part is design: making an agent's action legible to a human before it signs.
the 56% no-weekly-activity stat is the real headline, not the $60B. most of these are tokenized certificates, not live assets. minted once, then parked. 'representation stage' is the report being polite.
the design gap: nothing gives a holder a reason to move it on-chain after mint.
@solana_daily plume is #2 in holders here but not even top 5 in net flows. that gap is the story: holder count isn't capital.
and 'RWA total value' lumps tokenized treasuries, private credit, and real estate into one number. composition is what's worth ranking, not headcount.
@useTria competitions + leaderboards are a retention lever. the fork is what you rank on. raw PnL or volume just crowns whoever took the most leverage that week.
rank on risk-adjusted returns or consistency and you get traders who survive a bad week. that's the community worth keeping.
this is exactly why product narratives should communicate tradeoffs, not absolutes.
@HyperliquidX optimized for execution quality, latency, and an onchain orderbook that feels closer to a cex. that's a legit product decision.
but every optimization has a cost. in this case, it's geographic validator diversity. the tradeoff isn't the issue. pretending there wasn't one is. clear expectations build more trust than maximalist messaging.
completely agree.
this is exactly why web3 onboarding is still a mess. we expose protocol lingo before the users have built the mental model to understand it. most people want to send, receive, and share. not initiate transfers or retrieve assets.
progressive disclosure > front-loading jargons
good call killing sidebar-into-cards.
but you earn on deepnode by contributing: models, mining, validating. the state worth leading with is per-stream, is each model/node actually earning. balance + a flat tx ledger is still the exchange view. curious if it leads with that.
ps: the ui looks sleek ✨
@JupiterExchange removing the password retype is a real ux win ❤️
but in self-custody, unlock was never the attack surface. funds leave at the signing prompt, when someone approves a tx they didn't read.
would love to see a wallet make that moment the headline. that's the real security upgrade.
from design thinking pov:
the api gives apps liquidity, not the eligibility surface.
mint is gated @OndoFinance; secondary transfer isn't @Uniswap. so any integrated app can route a swap into a tokenized stock with none of the jurisdiction/disclosure ux.
that surface is the integration work that doesn't come free.
congrats team, the onboarding flow was a delight (thanks albus)
curious about one design decision: why not offer an optional non-custodial wallet during onboarding? 🤔
it feels like an opportunity to let users choose between a low-friction start and full self-custody, depending on their preferences.