One of the annoying things about making moe anthropomorphizations of military vehicles is that people often don't understand my design philosophy at all. My philosophy is that the girl is the vehicle, not a girl wearing the vehicle like a suit. The vehicle's characteristics are embedded into the girl's body and design itself.
For example, why are the B-52's breasts so big? Because they represent her payload. Why does she have horns? Because she's a dragon. Dragons are associated with old age, which fits the B-52, and her name is literally Stratofortress. Dragons are also known for their thick scales and durability, which represent her defenses.
But people completely miss this and go, "You said she's a B-52, but she doesn't have wings or rigging mounted on her." To that, I'd ask: if you remove the rigging from the girl, is she still the B-52? Or was she always just a normal anime girl wearing B-52 parts?
This is one reason I often criticize the masses. People are so used to being spoon-fed the stereotypical mecha-musume approach to moe anthropomorphization that, when they encounter a design built around a different philosophy, they don't stop and ask why the designer made those choices.
"I saw that! Good luck getting away with any funny business on my watch, you creep โก
And it's totally illegal to tamper with me, so don't even think about it, or I'll call the cops โก
A loser like you couldn't afford to pay the damages anyway! Heehee~"