@morten_bering It’s clear that he has something to prove, and you get the feeling that he has the motivation and desire to do it. The rest will be decided on the pitch. As for Di Gregorio, it was never clear from day one what exactly he wanted to show or prove.
@Petrit_7 True. Especially if we exclude 33+ top keepers with physical issues, who are actually TOP available? Even Carnesecchi and Suzuki not the top yet and spending 30+ mln in our conditions very risky
@khaledalnouss1 Szczęsny left Roma a year later simply because they decided to make Alisson their first-choice GK. Vicario won the EL, was named in the Team of the Tournament, and made some crucial saves. Let me say it again: I’m not pro-Vicario. I’m pro-anyone-but-Di Gregorio.
@khaledalnouss1 I’m not saying Vicario is a top GK. But neither was Szczęsny when he joined. My point is that pretty much anyone would be an upgrade on Di Gre. And anyone trying to find excuses for what he’s been doing — especially last season — is simply being biased
@khaledalnouss1 I've been following you for a long time, and I have no doubt that you know football. But if you're saying that Vicario and Di Gregorio are on the same level, I can't see it as anything other than bias.