I’m glad you finally came to the surface, rat. Your previous employees told me it was you and Erika that were teaming up with the YouTubers to put out the utterly fake narrative that Charlie and I were not friends and he had “anxiety”. You also worked together to lie about his pull toward Catholicism and to put out the deranged narrative that I secretly loved Charlie and hadn’t spoken to him since 2019 despite me touring with him through to May 2024.
Your lies are easy to debunk. I simply could not have demanded to speak at any TPUSA event because we had a speaker contract that rolled over annually, Andrew. This means I never ever had to beg or even request to speak at any event because I was contractually obligated to speak at every major TPUSA event, every year.
It’s also utterly ludicrous to suggest he didn’t pick up my calls because I never call. Any person who knows me knows I never pick up or call people. But you lie so much, I am going to accept this easy challenge to prove that you are a liar by releasing every single time I dialed Charlie’s number for the last 3 years.
As soon as I am back on air, that will be released. Gratefully, telephone logs go back 5 years. I simply prefer to text— and I thank God for that, as I’ve been able to debunk your lies about Charlie because of that habit.
Like I said, your number one problem is you are dumb.
Regarding your narrative that we never spoke, I literally just released Charlie and I discussing your partner Johnnie’s Moore’s demonic attack against ‘Christ is King’— a convo initiated by Charlie. Those messages are dated May 2025. But hey, let’s hear Charlie in his own words regarding our friendship—Shall we?
Here is Charlie, captured August 21st 2025—3 weeks before he died. He made it clear on stage that I was his friend and he wouldn’t be morally blackmailed against our friendship by people like you.
Also the night before he died— he texted you guys saying he wanted me back at Amfest after your Zionist backers demanded I be put on ice for Amfest 2024. Why did he text Justin and tell him he wanted me back? Do you deny that happened?
Those were again, Charlie’s words. One of the last wishes he expressed.
So was Charlie lying to his audience (and to his team in private conversations) weeks before he died, Andrew or are you simply a special kind of demon for attempting to rewrite history and convince the world that his real friends were people like Ben Shapiro and the very Zionists he was fighting against for his freedom?
Despite the millions of dollars spent— the world sees what is real. Truth cannot be destroyed.
Neither can Charlie’s voice. Here it is:
This “burden” objection makes little sense. A narrowly tailored three-day travel itinerary request is not a fishing expedition, not a warehouse search and not a demand for years of agency records. It concerns one identifiable official, one limited time window and one discrete category of documents: calendars, travel logs, movement records, security itineraries, expense records or scheduling materials. Under FOIA, an agency cannot simply recite “too burdensome” like a magic incantation. It must explain with specificity why the search would be unreasonably difficult, what systems were searched, what volume of records is implicated and whether narrower processing or redaction could resolve any claimed concern.
The obvious legal problem is proportionality. Three days of travel records should be among the easiest categories to locate because federal officials do not move invisibly. Travel is scheduled, approved, reimbursed, staffed and documented. If sensitive security details exist, FOIA already provides exemptions and redaction tools. That does not justify refusing the search altogether.
The proper response is to process the records, withhold only lawfully exempt portions and provide a Vaughn-style explanation. “Too great a burden” sounds less like law and more like bureaucratic fog machine.
In other words, it's bullshit.
Via FOIA, we formally requested Kash Patel’s travel itinerary for the 3 days leading up to Charlie Kirk’s assassination and we just heard back and were told the burden of the request is too great.
How is this even remotely legal?
We told Russia they couldn’t have Starbucks and they really said, “okay—now we own it, and we call it “Stars coffee”.
Same great taste, no American demands met. 😂
They did this for virtually every brand that got sanctioned btw. Just made it their own.
I’m sorry but I still can’t get over this. Turning Point USA colluded with the Daily Mail to host a screening of the now “secret video” of Charlie naming Erika as his successor.
This video is crucial. It was introduced to the public by Erika as Charlie’s dying wish: her takeover of the company. Erika CHOSE to walk out to Charlie’s alleged voice naming her as the CEO at Amfest, but stopped short of airing the video footage. Donors who were present say the audio is A.I., and that Charlie never uttered these words at the event in question.
Turning Point is now gaslighting us—bringing in experts to secretly screen and report on the video while claiming its existence doesn’t even matter because Charlie had told his friends that’s what he wanted.
WTF is going on?
🔮👀 Since predicting the future and time travel are hot topics right now, it may be worth familiarizing yourself with the CIA’s "Project Looking Glass."