@Jeffery4Pi@JeramyKitchen Nothing overrides the constitution. If your really believe that, I feel for you. Congress funds many things that are not constitutional; Obamacare comes to mind. SCOTUS overlooks these indiscretions frequently; Roe comes to mind.
@SecWar Put mandatory warrant requirements for US citizens and you will have a better argument. As long as the 702 provisions are as they are, I stand with Massie and say no.
@devorydarkins The goal is to point out the discrepancy between the Charlie Kirk model and the money driven model they now have, and to try to persuade a return.
@Jeffery4Pi@JeramyKitchen What ever you call it, it is not supposed to be happening under our constitution. Enumerated powers should mean exactly that.
@MeganMcCollou@b00mr0ast3d@FrankLuntz Mainly due to low cattle herd size due to lack of profit due to government allowed oligopolies, but also due to closure to Mexico imports from NWSW infestation during the Biden era and uncontrolled migration through the Darian Gap.
@rob_reeves@FrankLuntz NWSW entered Mexico and became a concern to the US in 2024 during the Biden period due to rampant migration through the Darian Gap. Cuts in USDA have not impacted the spread or detection.
TITLE XI SEC. 622: “Intelligence sharing and related security exchanges with Israel SHALL NOT be suspended, reduced, or otherwise materially limited.”
This is TREASON. I’m not being hyperbolic. This is blatant TREASON.
The Pentagon raised threat of Israeli spying on the U.S. to the highest level and AIPAC is openly cheering Republicans for section 224 in the NDAA that merges our military with Israel’s military.
Our government is being captured.
https://t.co/kn27xVrGep
🚨🚨Just in case you missed it. Here is Benjamin Netanyahu in his own words, thanking Congress for implementing “his plan” to take over the US military and intelligence services..🚨🚨
EXCLUSIVE: Congress to vote on NDAA provision integrating US-Israel military-industrial complex after HASC advances bill
The House Armed Services Committee advanced its $1.15 trillion FY2027 defense bill 44-12 overnight with Section 224 intact. The provision directs the defense secretary to name an executive agent to synchronize US-Israel weapons research, co-production, and procurement — moving support out of the foreign-aid framework and into the Pentagon’s acquisition pipeline.
No member is yet on record backing Section 224. The committee took no recorded vote on the provision itself. Ro Khanna’s amendment to strike it failed on a voice vote, with only Sara Jacobs joining him in open support. The first time members can be individually recorded on 224 is the House floor.
Section 224 was carried by chairman Mike Rogers and ranking member Adam Smith — a bipartisan pairing that all but guaranteed committee passage. It was Rogers’s final markup as chair. AIPAC publicly thanked him and called criticism of the provision categorically false.
The text is lifted largely from the US-Israel FUTURES Act (S.3855/H.R.7540, Jackson and Budd), which never advanced on its own. Folding it into a must-pass defense bill is how a stand-alone Israel measure avoids a stand-alone vote.
Procurement and co-production now face even less scrutiny than aid itself. Section 224 shifts the relationship into the channel with the least oversight — and one that is hard to unwind once supply chains merge.
The Senate Armed Services Committee marks up its version next week, and the House is expected to take up the bill by the July recess. Thomas Massie and Khanna say they will force a floor amendment to strip it. That recorded vote is where every member’s position becomes public.
Members who vote to keep Section 224 on the floor will own a permanent, recorded decision to embed a foreign military in US defense procurement outside the aid framework. Constituents will have that record. So will we.
🚨COUP ALERT: Netanyahu Brags He Wrote Section 224 Of The 2027 NDAA That Hands Control Of The Pentagon To Israel!
Alex Jones Reads The Israeli Leader's Letter On-Air That Thanks Congressman Stutzman For Putting "My Plan" Into The Legislation!
⬇️WATCH ALEX JONES LIVE NOW⬇️
https://t.co/KK6izmnuOV
@osbornforne@barnes_law It is the same in many, if not most, industries. The US government has allowed, and even promoted, oligopolies in the name of "efficiency". What we have gotten is lip sided supply chains that create unforeseen issues like this.