@Elaine1029473@Jennifer55gt An employee’s pay rate is a matter between the company and the employee, not the customer. I’m not sure why the customer would have any role in that agreement.
@Mercedes_AMG12@Jennifer55gt An employee’s pay rate is a matter between the company and the employee, not the customer. I’m not sure why the customer would have any role in that agreement.
@PrestigeValetOK@Jennifer55gt An employee’s pay rate is a matter between the company and the employee, not the customer. I’m not sure why the customer would have any role in that agreement.
@Cathom_4@cyberiod@Web3Marmot@KobeissiLetter A negative print in one S&P 500 employment figure doesn’t prove a structural shift. It can reflect normalization or macro cycles. Calling it the “biggest productivity shift of the century” is an overreach from a single data point.
@Cathom_4@cyberiod@Web3Marmot@KobeissiLetter That’s data, not interpretation. And markets don’t move based on a single chart, reducing it to that is an oversimplification. Over decades on social media, charts like this have often been used to drive fear, which is exactly why one snapshot isn’t enough to draw conclusions.
@Cathom_4@cyberiod@Web3Marmot@KobeissiLetter didn’t claim I observed 400,000 people being fired. I’m questioning the interpretation of that figure and the conclusion being drawn from it. Those are different things.