They sold you a brain that runs on sugar. You were born running on something better.
Sugar burns like kindling, a bright flare gone in minutes. Ketones burn like a log, low and steady for hours.
Kindling needs feeding constantly, so glucose has you eat, spike, crash, and back in the drawer by eleven. A log you set once, so ketones burn off your own fat with nothing added.
The sugar fire roars then collapses every couple of hours. The ketone fire never spikes, so it never hands you the crash.
Glucose is only fuel. Ketones are fuel that also flips on the genes that repair the cell and guard the wiring while you run.
Feed the kindling and your day is a graph of peaks and pits. Burn the log and it is one flat clear line from morning to night.
This is not some hack. It is the fuel you ran on at birth, the one your species crossed continents on between meals.
Sugar was the downgrade. They just sold it to you as breakfast.
This is literally the same article that got me accused, by others, of being a Stirnerite. And that one was, remarkably, closer to the mark.
The post is a particularly fascinating one because it suggests that people genuinely believe that, if you post a "quote" with ten ellipses, no one will raise their eyebrows. For the record, this particular quote covers what was, I believe, a ten-page essay.
To be briefer than I have ever been on this matter: Ideologies have a positive basis, so ideologies aren't fundamentally "anti-" or "non-" X, Y, or Z.
If you say that you are "anti-" something, you are "anti-" something for a reason. To nail down the foundation of a belief system, you determine the principle for which you oppose something else.
So, "I do not define myself as fundamentally anti-statist", as is apparent for every individual with a modicum of media literacy, does not mean "I am a statist". I oppose the state—you do not need to read much of my work to arrive at this, but it is certainly apparent in the essay itself, where I frame the state as the absolute and permanent aggressor—because I advocate the fundamental principle of self-determination.
This prop, however, was posted by a reactionary (I don't think he will mind my calling him that), so he would naturally disagree that you cannot have a fundamentally negative ideology. Reactionism is about negating momentum. Rather than address this directly, the easier route is to read the article (which he or someone must have, since the entire 'quote' covers, with ellipses, the entirety of the twenty-minute read) and then lie to you about it.
There is a reason that the original post did not link to the article. I urge that people do read it, not because it is particularly brilliant, but because it will very quickly reveal exactly the level of respect for you, as a reader, that the people posting this information have; as well as precisely the degree of honesty with which they engage their allies and opponents alike.
You might well disagree with some of the arguments, but there is no way to read the piece in good faith and come away with the notion that its author is a deputy of the state.
BREAKING: Sen. Rand Paul says newly released internal federal documents show the FBI asked Customs and Border Protection not to stop, search, or question EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak when he returned from China through JFK Airport in 2021 during the WHO’s COVID-19 origins investigation.
According to the documents, CBP had identified Daszak as an “extremely high person of interest” and planned to search his electronic devices and question him about his ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but stood down after a request from the FBI.
VIA: @BillMelugin_
Americans are learning about Israel's hold over America like never before.
It did not start with Trump.
It goes back ... far.
Trump (and the rest of the government) are just more open about it now than ever before.
The Supreme Court just ruled 5-4 that police tracking your phone location is a search. This morning's decision puts every Flock camera in the country on notice.
Here's what changed for your rights:👇
In a surveillance state where every pole sprouts eyes, one chainsaw-wielding patriot delivers the ultimate trim: Don’t Spy On Me.
Liberty isn’t passive—it’s the roar of defiance against Big Brother’s digital leash.
Cut the cameras, reclaim your shadows.
Freedom’s roots run deeper than their wires.
When Erling Haaland wanted milk that made him feel unstoppable, he drove to a farm in Cheshire and bought it raw, a glass every morning and another after training.
When Colt McCoy, the NFL quarterback, was asked about the raw milk he has drunk since milking his family's cows as a boy, he waved the fuss away: it's just milk, bro.
When Bryce Mitchell won inside the octagon this summer and a reporter asked him the secret, he shrugged and said he thought it was mostly the raw milk.
When Marlon Vera fights, he does it on raw milk and will not touch the plant based stuff, keeping it in the house for the whole family, kids and all.
The baseball star Bryce Harper is another, pouring it into a coffee in a video that went round the internet. And none of this is new. Paul Anderson, billed as the strongest man alive in the 1950s, is said to have put away fourteen pints of milk in a single day, long before anyone thought to be frightened of it.
Different sports, different countries, different eras, the same instinct arrived at independently: that the milk which built strong humans for ten thousand years might be worth more than the version boiled until it survives a month on a shelf.
The old authorities spent a century warning everyone off it. The man now running American health drinks his raw. And the ones ignoring the warning keep on winning.
@GovEvers You’re so full of shit. You stood in the way of rural broadband using broadcast TV towers and frequencies. Typical obstruction of solutions you can’t take credit for. #DisruptTheCorruption