🐚 @526daysofly - Twitter Profile

Pinned Tweet

🐚 @526daysofLy

8 months ago

89% valid

Woodsy Corner.

@muncorner

8 months ago

🍎 how does pinterest see you? search: fashion, pantone, mood, and food.

119

605

22

1K

1M

1

0

2K

526daysofLy retweeted

1tokki

@juantokki

13 days ago

For those too lazy to read: Basically, Danielle’s legal team is trying to highlight that this case is also a competition law issue rather than simply a disagreement over an exclusive contract. Their argument is that HYBE/ADOR didn’t just sue Danielle, they also singled her out from the other NewJeans members without a reasonable justification and used their dominant market position to try to permanently push her out of the K-pop industry. They claim this wasn’t just about enforcing a contract, but about sending a warning to other artists that challenging HYBE comes with devastating consequences. The significance is that the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) has reportedly decided to open an investigation into allegations of abuse of market dominance and unfair trade practices. Wait. Before some of you overreacted, that doesn’t mean HYBE or ADOR have been found to have broken the law. It simply means the KFTC believes the allegations are serious enough to investigate. The complaint also argues that this goes beyond Danielle’s case. It claims excessive contractual penalties and the selective use of lawsuits can discourage artists from moving to other agencies, make it harder for smaller companies to compete, and ultimately reduce competition and innovation across the K-pop industry. In other words, the filing argues this isn’t just about one artist, it’s about how the industry’s biggest companies use their market power.

juantokki's tweet photo. For those too lazy to read:

Basically, Danielle’s legal team is trying to highlight that this case is also a competition law issue rather than simply a disagreement over an exclusive contract.

Their argument is that HYBE/ADOR didn’t just sue Danielle, they also singled her out from the other NewJeans members without a reasonable justification and used their dominant market position to try to permanently push her out of the K-pop industry. They claim this wasn’t just about enforcing a contract, but about sending a warning to other artists that challenging HYBE comes with devastating consequences.

The significance is that the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) has reportedly decided to open an investigation into allegations of abuse of market dominance and unfair trade practices. Wait. Before some of you overreacted, that doesn’t mean HYBE or ADOR have been found to have broken the law. It simply means the KFTC believes the allegations are serious enough to investigate.

The complaint also argues that this goes beyond Danielle’s case. It claims excessive contractual penalties and the selective use of lawsuits can discourage artists from moving to other agencies, make it harder for smaller companies to compete, and ultimately reduce competition and innovation across the K-pop industry. In other words, the filing argues this isn’t just about one artist, it’s about how the industry’s biggest companies use their market power.

21

6K

1K

704

232K

526daysofLy retweeted

anna ִ ࣪𖤐 @sparktosolar

12 days ago

Dani and all of NewJeans will forever have my respect like a bunch of teenage girls had the balls of titanium to stand against a conglomerate knowing it was going to be a tough battle. And they weren't even doing this just for themselves, but also for the future of the industry

24

18K

3K

515

224K

526daysofLy retweeted