Itโs done, bro. โ๏ธ
The paper leak mafia just got its biggest reality check.
For years, honest students suffered while paper leak rackets turned their dreams into a business. Not anymore.
With the Public Examinations (Amendment) Bill, 2026, the Modi Government has taken a decisive step to protect millions of aspirants and restore trust in Indiaโs examination system.
Hereโs what changes:
โ Up to 10 yearsโ imprisonment for organized paper leak offences.
โ Fines of up to โน10 crore for major paper leak rackets.
โ Action against mafias, middlemen, corrupt officials, service providers, and tech enablers.
โ Stronger cyber security, better coordination, and a high-level committee for future exam reforms.
Under PM Modiโs leadership, the message is clear: merit will prevail, and those who profit from cheating will face the law.
๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ซ๐ฏ๐ ๐ก๐จ๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ฑ๐๐ฆ๐ฌ. ๐ฎ๐ณ
In just two days, even after crossing 5.6 million followers, the mainstream media chose to stay silent.
1. Sudhir Chaudhary : 0
2. Anjana Om Kashyap : 0
3. Rubika Liyaquat : 0
4. Amish Devgan : 0
5. Sushant Sinha : 0
6. Navika Kumar : 0
7. Rahul Kanwal : 0
8. Chitra Tripathi : 0
9. Shweta Singh : 0
10. Rajat Sharma: 0
But that's okay. We don't need anyone's validation. We have YOU. Millions of Indians are standing with us, and that is our biggest strength.
๐ฎ๐ณ Jai Hind!
#reservationhataomovement
#EndReservation
ANNOUCEMENTโ๏ธ
๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ฐ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ก๐ข ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐ข๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ฌ
In light of the recent public statements and administrative commitments concerning the blanket withdrawal or quashing of First Information Reports (FIRs) related to the agitations led by the CJP and associated acts of public disorder, our Clients wish to assert their legal rights and standing. They vigorously oppose any such executive concessions or applications filed pursuant to Section 360 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 (formerly known as Section 321 of the CrPC).
It is well-established in law that the withdrawal of criminal prosecution cannot be permitted as a mere political compromise or executive leniency in cases involving cognizable offenses such as public violence, obstruction of public servants in the line of duty, and disturbance of public peace. Consequently, our Clients will be submitting appropriate Intervention Applications and Impleadment Petitions to the competent jurisdictional Courts. They aim to demonstrate that any unilateral withdrawal of prosecution threatens the rule of law, and the dismissal of such criminal proceedings without judicial review would be entirely illegitimate, legally unsound, and against the public interest.
๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ก๐ข ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ฐ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฌ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฏ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ๐ฌ @SachdevaAmita