@awesome_tori@EmmaScott@CatGirlieMeow The point still stands.
It's not a Venn diagram (at most emulating the visual language of one), nor meant to be a serious diagram;
The meaning behind it easily comes through, therefore it does makes sense.
@awesome_tori@EmmaScott@CatGirlieMeow >sees a meme
it's a diagram making a simple no bitches joke
>understands it
>"no actuallys" the easily comprehensible meme with standards only asked for in formal situations
>gets "no actuallied" in return
>complains about the latter cause can't come back to defend original pov
@awesome_tori@EmmaScott@CatGirlieMeow Yes there is. For a joke. It's a meme. It's intent is a joke. It loosely emulates the visual language of one for a joke. It's not formally one, it's not even necessary for it to be and probably not even supposed to.
@awesome_tori@EmmaScott@CatGirlieMeow It's not one because if you read it it doesn't work formally. It's just a diagram, at most inspired by Venn diagrams or Euler's, and the meaning it holds it's obvious until actual pedantic people come to say "ermmm actually this obvious joke actually is formated wrong, actually"
@awesome_tori@EmmaScott@CatGirlieMeow Where do you get that it was clearly made to be a Venn diagram? I'm not being pedantic, I genuinely don't see it. It's clearly not doing what a Venn diagram does, so why does everybody assumes it's one? So many posts like this every fucking week with the same comments
@awesome_tori@EmmaScott@CatGirlieMeow It doesn't mean that's a Venn diagram lol
It can be any comparative (made up even) diagram. It's not math or well established logic