INTD2001 U.S.A

Intended for classroom purposes. Twitter account for America, INTD 2001 🇺🇸

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

Final Thoughts. https://t.co/6A3zx5OzUJ

[IPMG at SDGs @INTD2001_IPMG]

*Schnurr appreciation tweet*

[INTD_UNDP @intd2001undp]

Final update:

Goal 10:
Indicator 10 does not pass
Indicator 10.1 does not pass
Indicator 10.2 does not pass

Goal 17
Indicator 17 does not pass
Indicator 17.1 passes

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

the proposed indicator 17.1 passes, the session is now closed! We are so pleased to have worked with all the delegations present for these negotiations. We hope all delegations have a wonderful holiday season!

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

we are now discussing the inclusion of GDP instead of USD

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

10.2 does not meet the minimum threshold, the indicator does not pass.

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

@INTD2001_IPMG would like to ask @KenyaStake why adding the indicator of "ethnicity" would be considered 'too inclusive', Kenya responds that it is not conducive to what they are trying to do

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

@gdn_intd2001 @intd2001undp @BrazilIntd2001 The quote was not yours but the director generals. Happy to hear the issue was addressed and the apology accepted!

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

@INTD2001_IPMG is concerned that the goal is too broad, and cannot therefore properly address the targets of the goal.

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

@intd2001undp states that while the decriminalization of homosexuality is necessary in recognition that LGBTQ+ people are marginalized worldwide, decriminalization would allow members of the LGBTQ+ community to enter the workforce and contribute to economic growth

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

@intd2001audb suggests that adding decriminalizing homosexuality is outside the scope of this target and is concerned about the breadth of this indicator

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

@IntdOxfam did not submit the indicator, but nevertheless supports it

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

who submitted the indicator?????

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

@intd2001undp recognizes all the delegations which supported them, and issues an apology for any injured parties

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

@intd2001undp's proposes an indicator, @BrazilIntd2001 and @gdn_intd2001 both voice concern for why they were not added as supported to this indicator "because optics matter"

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

Now voting on Goal Number 10, reducing inequality within and among countries, proposed indicator does not pass

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

Indicator 5.3 is adopted!

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

@INTD2001_Canada proposes indicator 5.3, the United States supports this in recognition that it does not set age restrictions

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

5.2 passes based on unilateral consensus! well done delegations!

[INTD2001 U.S.A @AMERICASDGS]

@intdp_china asks for a clarification on the use of the term 'gender'