Álvaro Awad

For what is a man,
What has he got?
If not himself,
Then he has naught.
To say the things
He truly feels
And not the words
Of one who kneels

[Make Chile Fome Again 🇨🇱 @Gorderizador]

🔴 Ministro Iván Poduje: "los que se toman terrenos van a tener que ponerse en la fila porque nosotros le vamos a dar prioridad a la gente honesta que lleva años esperando por una vivienda"

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

Sí

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

Aquí lo vio primero 👀

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

Columna en El Mercurio Legal:
“Digámoslo en latín: 𝘈𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴, 𝘯𝘦 𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘶𝘥𝘦𝘹 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘶𝘮".

Link directo: https://t.co/DrcCzguwAn

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

@medel2026 Si no empieza, no vale la crítica 😄

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

Intuiciones morales contrarias al progreso - Álvaro Fischer

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

¿Por qué los resfríos ahora duran 2 meses?

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

Una Encíclica para degustar.

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

😎 #BecaChile

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

Tylenol es mi copiloto

[Mirko Tarsetti @Mirk_T]

Se imaginan dónde estaríamos si prosperaba el escenario donde los gobiernos regionales y municipios podían emitir deuda... de esa nos salvamos.

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

Ha sido un gusto, caballeros.

[CNN Chile @CNNChile]

Anthropic advierte que Claude avanza hacia desarrollarse a sí misma sin intervención humana y propone frenar mundialmente el desarrollo de la IA

https://t.co/LlVRMT7I3s

[Héctor B. M. @uprazhneniye]

En el funeral de Theodosia Karam, su padre y su hermano, los familiares se lamentan diciendo que «Jesús nos pidió perdonar, pero esto es demasiado».

Luego hay gente que se pregunta cómo es posible que Hezbolá esté lleno de cristianos luchando contra Israel...

[Millie Marconi @MillieMarconnni]

A Chicago philosopher wrote one book in 1940 proving that 95% of the books you have read in your life, you didn't actually read, and Charlie Munger has been telling people to read it for 50 years.

His name was Mortimer Adler.

He spent 40 years at the University of Chicago, ran the editorial board of the Encyclopædia Britannica, and built his entire career on one uncomfortable observation about the people around him.

Most adults who called themselves well-read had not actually read a book in the real sense even once. They had run their eyes over the pages, registered the words, formed a vague impression, and put it back on the shelf.

The book had passed through them without ever entering them.

In 1940 he wrote How to Read a Book. It has stayed in print for 86 years.

Charlie Munger recommends it. Naval Ravikant recommends it. Fareed Zakaria recommends it.

Every serious thinker who builds a career on absorbing information eventually finds their way to this book, and the reason is that Adler had isolated something nobody else was naming clearly.

There are four levels of reading. Almost everyone is stuck on the second one. The fourth level is so different from what most people call reading that you have probably never done it in your entire life.

Level one is elementary.

You learn it as a child. You decode the letters into words and the words into sentences. You finish the sentence and understand roughly what it said. This is reading the way a 7-year-old reads, and almost every adult on earth has stopped developing past this point in some quiet way.

Level two is inspectional.

This is skimming. You move through a book quickly to figure out what it is broadly about. You read the back cover, scan the table of contents, glance at a few paragraphs, and form an opinion. Most adults who claim to have read 50 books a year are actually doing this. They are inspecting books, not reading them. They walk away with a vague sense of the argument and almost none of the evidence that supports it.

Level three is analytical.

This is the level Adler said most people have never properly experienced. You take one book and you wrestle with it for as long as it takes. You identify the question the author is trying to answer. You map their argument from front to back. You write your disagreements in the margins. You force yourself to articulate, in your own words, what the author is claiming and why. The point is not to finish the book. The point is to argue with it as if the author were sitting across the table from you. Most people never do this once in their life, because it is exhausting and slow and feels nothing like the reading they were taught as children.

Level four is the one almost nobody knows exists. Adler called it syntopical reading. The word means "across topics," and the technique is something closer to running a small private research lab in your own head.

You pick a single question that actually matters to you. How does power corrupt people. Why do civilizations collapse. What makes a marriage last. How does a person change their own mind. Then you assemble five or ten or twenty books from different authors, different centuries, different traditions, all of them taking a swing at the same question.

You do not read any of them cover to cover. You move between them. You find the chapter in book three that addresses the same question as the chapter in book seven. You force those two authors to argue with each other inside your own head.

The book stops being the unit of reading. The question becomes the unit. And the authors become voices in a conversation you are now hosting.

This is the level where reading stops being consumption and starts being construction.

You are no longer absorbing what someone else thinks. You are building a position of your own out of the friction between people who disagreed.

Adler argued that this is the only level of reading where you stop being a passive receiver of other people's ideas and start being someone who can produce ideas of their own.

The reason Charlie Munger has been recommending this book for 50 years is that this is exactly how Munger has always thought. He calls it building a latticework of mental models. The technique he is describing is just syntopical reading applied for a lifetime.

You take the strongest insight from psychology, the strongest insight from biology, the strongest insight from economics, and you stack them against the same problem until something new falls out the bottom.

The reason most people never reach level four is not that it is intellectually difficult. It is that it is logistically uncomfortable. It requires you to keep multiple books open at once.

It requires you to take notes that nobody is going to grade. It requires you to abandon the goal of finishing books and replace it with the goal of answering questions.

This is also why AI just changed everything Adler was teaching.

NotebookLM, Claude, and tools like them let you do syntopical reading at a speed that would have looked like magic to a Chicago philosopher in 1940.

You upload 10 books on the same question. You ask the AI to surface every place those authors agree and every place they contradict each other.

The technique Adler said almost nobody on earth had reached can now be run on a Sunday afternoon by anyone with a laptop and one good question.

The technique was always the unlock. The bottleneck used to be time. The bottleneck is now curiosity.

Most people will keep reading the way they always have. A book at a time. Eyes over the pages. No question driving it. No other authors in the room. Adler called that level two for a reason.

You are not behind on your reading list.

You are behind on the level you are reading at.

[sarah @sahouraxo]

BREAKING:

Israel is dropping white phosphorus bombs on civilian areas in the village of Arnoun, Nabatieh, South Lebanon.

These are internationally banned munitions — and Israel is unleashing them against civilians.

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

@PabloJulio @jorgefabrega Eso me tiene loco. La IA escribe como a mí me ha gustado siempre 😂, con raya larga — y dos puntos :

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

Texto que leo me huele a ChatGPT.

¿Delirio de persecución?

[Álvaro Awad @alvaroawad]

@a_rbenavides No lo hago! Usé chat “ChatGPT” por eponimia comercial. Debería haber dicho “IA”