@ColeLightfoot @KamalaHQ Yeah that's my understanding. A lot of AI generators already say made by AI so I think that'd count for the purposes of stating it's digitally created to check the parody box
@ColeLightfoot @KamalaHQ The laws definition is very different! There are exceptions for parody etc. The tldr definition is intentionally created content such that content would falsely appear as authentic and requires malice. Idk if good or not, but seeing wild misinterpretations on this website!
@ColeLightfoot @KamalaHQ I believe you are correct, but I don't think it meets criteria for the definition of "materially deceptive content" in AB 2839. Pretty interesting read and definitions if you have the time
https://t.co/ESw4uAwpxH
@ColeLightfoot Per CMS, the 2020 plan gave incentives to manufacturers and relied on voluntary participation in part D plans for some coverage phases vs 2022 act mandated the cap for all part B and D. Repealing the act that made it mandatory is part of the R 2025 budget proposal. Yes real
@EMPoisonPharmD@0xpanoprx@KenKnipp78 Curious your thoughts on this - I fear some students who would benefit may decide not to rank ED as a result of hyperfixation on it. Maybe standardize and advertise penalty prior to ranking to mitigate? So theyd know they can rank and worst case couldn't get honors or lose 5%etc
@EMPoisonPharmD@0xpanoprx@KenKnipp78 It does sound a little odd!! If it's a consistent sentiment, I think one could justify mandating it by acknowledging the potential benefit rather than through comparison to other skills. Then can grade refusal on grounds of it being clearly stated as required prior to signing up
@EMPoisonPharmD@0xpanoprx@KenKnipp78 CPR would be useful to get practice in, and I only say this to try to demonstrate my point lol. Making them do CPR during ACLS in the ED that I'm used to would be more like making them check a manual BP post ROSC when cuff doesn't read. Should be learning to get NE instead IMO
@EMPoisonPharmD@0xpanoprx@KenKnipp78 A better comparison to giving vaccines in a community pharmacy would be a hypothetical pre-hospital rotation with paramedics. Then, I would say it should be expected and they'd deserve a lower grade for refusing. Key difference making it optional is the resources available.
@EMPoisonPharmD@0xpanoprx@KenKnipp78 Oh for sure, I agree with you on most of this except for the original question. We can be disappointed by them declining the extra opportunity, but I think it's fundamentally inappropriate to threaten to punish students if they don't want to do something that isn't a routine task
@EMPoisonPharmD@0xpanoprx@KenKnipp78 Core tasks, not competency. BLS cert proved competence to respond in that case. The issue causing point loss is refusal to do routine tasks.
Counseling is required by law, while the benefits of pharmacist integration into ACLS teams are unrelated to who is pressing on the chest
@EMPoisonPharmD@0xpanoprx@KenKnipp78 Obviously I agree with it being a great opportunity and appreciate encouraging students to step out of their comfort zone & trying to grow our role. Just don't think this is something to be punative about because it's not a core task akin to counseling in a community pharmacy
@EMPoisonPharmD@0xpanoprx@KenKnipp78 Students aren't held accountable for those other skills on rotation unless it's a core task in the area (vaccine in community, BP in amb). Imo, hard to consider compressions a core task when there's already an evidence-based role on an ACLS team that other professions don't fill
You can curse daylight saving time, daylight saving, daylight savings, daylight savings time, and/or daylight time.
All are considered acceptable so go off.