I plugged the manuscript for my first book written in 2013 into an "AI detector." Obviously before the advent of ChatGTP etc. Said it was 80 percent AI. They are unreliable nonsense
There are a lot of defenders of AI likely writing this op-ed, or people commenting on how Pangram overstates the use of AI. What cannot be defended is that the op-ed is bland. It's not a good op-ed. It lacks any style. It needed an editor to shape it.
I don’t do Twitter fights, but I will make an exception here. 1) I am not your brother. 2) “Move on. Shit not that serious?” You lose your 21 year old son to cancer and your comment is “shit not that serious?” 3) If you have any free time today, go fuck yourself.
Ok so this one is interesting!
Here’s what happened. Uber is accusing some personal injury lawyers and doctors of running a scam together. The claim is that the lawyers would send people injured in Uber rides (or claiming to be) to specific doctors.
Those doctors would then do unnecessary treatments or exaggerate the injuries.
Why? So the lawsuits looked way more serious so the lawyers could demand bigger payouts from Uber.
AND NOW a CA judge just said Uber’s case can move forward under RICO (normally used against organized crime rings).
I’m really excited this was able to move forward. I have a feeling this goes pretty deep (and is very very huge).
On the @PittTweet campus this afternoon with the Pitt Dems and the @PADemParty Rise Up initiative helping register voters and making sure people have a plan to vote.