Banning Kirpans for Sikhs, is like banning having hands for Muslims after the Manchester airport debacle, or banning right wingers from have penises after one raped a woman for being an immigrant. The tool is not the issue. People who are not able to control themselves is. That is not solved by removing the liberties of those who can.
Does it make you “far right” to want:
- vetted immigration
- no digital ID
- lower taxes
- no two-tier policing
- free speech
- pedophiles out of office
- lower cost of living
MSM and politicians will call these ladies far right. Does this sound far right to you or just right?
Diljit is ethnically Punjabi. He sings in Punjabi. He dresses in Punjabi fashion. He draws from Punjabi folk history. He speaks on Punjabi issues. He was born in Punjab.
But he can't say he's from Punjab?
Indian & Hindu Nationalists are the most insecure losers on earth.
But there's more here to unpack.
Why does it bother them when Punjabis assert Punjabi identity?
Why do they want to erase Punjabi pride?
Why do they ask Punjabis and Sikhs to engage in purity tests and loyalty affirmations to India constantly even though we sacrificed the most for the naive promise of India?
Why do they try to malign both Punjabiness and Sikh self-determination of Khalistan in the same breath?
Why do they allow silly propaganda Bollywood movies with Punjabi characters like Dhurandhar but ban real life biopics of shaheeds like Bhai Jaswant Singh Khalra?
Why do they tell Sikhs in the diaspora to come to Punjab to change things if they really care, but when someone like Bhai Amitpal Singh does come back and ignites a revolution they throw him in jail under draconian Indian laws indefinitely...and in spite of that he wins an MP election?
Why do they tell us India is great but then engage in transnational repression of Punjabi Sikhs abroad?
I can go on and on. It all connects. It's all an effort to reinstate ghulami.
They want to appropriate our culture and identity (a culture and identity the world loves), but want to erase us as a people globally.
Insecure losers.
A powerful scene in the Odyssey happens when Odysseus finally returns to Ithaca after twenty years of war and wandering.
You would expect the story to end with celebration, with the hero coming home, the family reunited, and order restored.
Homer does something far stranger.
Odysseus arrives disguised as a beggar, because Athena warns him that the palace has been taken over by more than a hundred suitors who have been living there for years, eating his food, drinking his wine, and pressuring his wife Penelope to marry one of them.
They believe Odysseus is dead and in their minds the kingdom is already theirs.
So the king of Ithaca walks through his own halls dressed in rags while the men stealing his house sit comfortably at his tables. They mock him, throw scraps at him, and one of them even strikes him, and Odysseus takes it. That is the remarkable part, because the same man who blinded the Cyclops and survived twenty years of disasters now stands quietly while strangers insult him in his own home. Homer tells us his heart burns inside his chest and that he wants to attack them immediately, yet he restrains himself and waits.
Instead of striking, Odysseus studies the room carefully. He counts the men, watches their habits, and quietly observes which servants remain loyal and which have betrayed him. The hero of the Odyssey does something most people cannot do, which is delay revenge until the moment is right.
Eventually Penelope announces a contest and brings out Odysseus’ great bow, declaring that she will marry the man who can string it and shoot an arrow through twelve axe heads lined up in a row. One by one the suitors try and fail, because none of them can even bend the bow. Then the beggar asks for a turn. The suitors laugh at first, but the bow is eventually handed to him.
Odysseus takes it in his hands and strings it effortlessly. Homer says the sound of the bowstring tightening rings through the hall like the note of a swallow. Then he places an arrow on the string and sends it cleanly through all twelve axe heads.
In that moment the beggar disappears. Odysseus turns the bow toward the suitors and reveals who he is.
What follows is one of the most brutal scenes in Greek literature. The doors are sealed and the suitors realize too late that they are trapped inside the hall. Odysseus, his son Telemachus, and two loyal servants begin killing them one by one. There is no escape, no mercy, and no negotiation. The men who spent years consuming another man’s house die inside it.
It is a violent ending, but Homer wants you to understand something important. The real danger to Odysseus was never just the monsters and storms on the long journey home. It was the possibility that someone else might take his place while he was gone. When Odysseus finally returns, he reminds everyone in Ithaca of a simple truth: a man’s home is not truly his unless he is willing to fight for it.
🚨🗣️ 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Ruud Gullit is RIPPING into the current game of football!
"I have decided to STOP watching football. I don't enjoy our sport anymore. I watched Arsenal vs Chelsea, what an absolute GARBAGE match of football!"
"I see players trying to create corner kicks, trying to create throw-ins, I see ball boys ready to give towels to the players. Football has become absolutely HORRIBLE. I hope that this is not the path we are heading at."
"I am waiting for players who will take on defenders again, someone like Lamine Yamal. I am missing the joy! I just don't enjoy football anymore."
"Everyone is executing tasks on the pitch. Where are the players dribbling? Where are the players with b*lls? WHY IS EVERYONE PASSING?! PASSING! PASSING! PASSING!"
Restore Britain’s immigration policy - the lies and smears have already begun, so here’s the truth.
Illegal migrants. Gone. All of them. Without apology. Every man, every woman. They will all be deported. We have released the most comprehensive deportation policy every produced in Britain. 100 pages of detailed steps to remove every single illegal migrant living in our country.
It is deportation poetry.
This is step one - these miscreants are the priority. The sex pests will be removed, the hotels will close, the flights will begin. I promise you that.
Don’t need to go over it, the British people know my position.
Legal immigration - for the foreseeable future, far more people will leave than enter.
Entire visa routes will be closed off from certain countries that are proven to supply us with sex pests, criminals, illegals, Islamists and the rest.
This is vital. It underpins the entire policy.
Who would be on that red list?
Albania, Pakistan, Somalia, Eritrea, Afghanistan and plenty more.
We will discriminate. We will look at the facts, and then discriminate. Good.
We must understand that legal immigration has done far more damage to Britain than illegal immigration.
So large parts of that must, and will, be reversed.
If a foreign national is entirely unable to speak English, then they will be asked to leave. How can somebody possibly contribute if they cannot communicate? They can’t. They should go home. Thanks, but no thanks.
A foreigner claiming benefits and living in social housing. Again, they will be asked to leave. It is simply not our responsibility to care for these people. I wish them a healthy and happy life, in their own countries.
Watch how that helps to solve our housing crisis overnight…
British social housing for British families.
Foreign criminals gone, day one. No need to even discuss that.
We will not tolerate extremists who wish to do us harm. Foreign Islamists will be deported. Dual national extremists will have their citizenships stripped, and then deported.
If an individual surrenders his second citizenship in an attempt to fraudulently remain in Britain, we will take the necessary steps to reverse that process and deport them. There is a recurring theme here, I am sure you have gathered.
ILR will be abolished in its entirety - the Boriswave will be reversed.
If a country refuses to accept their deported citizens, we will threaten them. Foreign aid, visas, remittances and more. Push to work with the Americans and others. A ‘deportation NATO’. Do it once hard enough, and it won’t have to be done again.
A third-party scheme, like Rwanda, is key. It means that if we cannot ascertain where a foreign national is from for whatever reason, they go to Rwanda. I hear it’s lovely at this time of the year.
We will take a small number of ultra high-skilled migrants - on one condition. It benefits the British people.
Rules and fees around spouse visas will be eased for individuals from non-red list countries. Fraud will be brutally crushed, but hardworking British men and women have every right to bring their foreign spouse to Britain and raise a family. That will be celebrated and encouraged.
Their arrival, and subsequent contribution to Britain, will be a net positive.
In combination with the vast numbers of unproductive migrants being ejected, there will be one winner.
The British people.
How many deportations will all of this result in?
Millions.
If you don’t like that, then Restore Britain is not the party for you.
If you agree, then I hope you will consider joining us.
Jimmy Saville abused ~450 children over a 50 year period.
Keir Starmer - the Director of Public Prosecutions - declined to prosecute.
The case file was later destroyed.
And the BBC covered it up.
“The US government has unlocked zero point energy.”
AJ Gentile from The Why Files just blew Tucker Carlson’s mind.
He revealed that many people have invented free energy tech since the 1930s.
But a 1951 law classified all of it.
And it mandated that this tech can only be sold to the US military.
AJ suspects that UFO videos released by the military since 2017 are actually examples of this top secret tech, not extraterrestrial crafts.
Bookmark this post.
This will shock you:
“There’s a man named Charles Pogue, who in the ‘30s tinkered with his carburetor and was able to get 200 miles a gallon.”
“Once the news of his engine got out, the oil stocks crashed.”
“So the oil industry lobbied the US government … and in 1951, the Invention Secrecy Act was passed.”
“If you patent any device that is more than 20% efficient, that’s instantly classified.”
“You can’t talk about it, you can’t build it, and you can’t sell it unless you sell it to the US military.”
“Then there was a man named Tom Ogle … in the ‘70s.”
“He accidentally rewires his lawnmower engine to take the exhaust and pump it back into the carburetor, and this thing runs on a gallon of gas for 78 hours or something.”
“So he reconfigures his car … and he’s getting 200 miles to the gallon.”
“Suddenly, Tom, without a history of drug use, stumbles out of a bar, he’s drunk, and he’s killed.”
“You might remember Stanley Meyer and the water car … this is the 1990s now.”
“Stanley’s figured out how to take tap water, put it into his car, and run his car on water.”
“It works, and he drives it all over the place.”
“It’s all over the news.”
“I think he’s sitting at a Cracker Barrel with his brother and some investors, and they raise a glass to toast.”
“Stanley suddenly doesn’t feel well.”
“He runs outside, he starts vomiting, his brother chases after him … and Stanley says, ‘they poisoned me,’ and he dies.”
“He had another invention that most people don’t know about before his water car, which was this toroid ring.”
“This donut-shaped ring that he invented that created energy out of nothing, and levitated.”
“But he patented it, and it got hit with the Secrecy Act, and they made his life miserable.”
“There are other inventors in between, T. Townsend Brown invents this antigravity technology.”
“And we get to Floyd ‘Sparky’ Sweet.”
“He videotaped all of his stuff.”
“He’s a garage tinkerer, but he’s an engineer.”
“You see him running a fan at high RPMs, and then he’s got light bulbs … and it’s all running off this little box the size of a deck of cards.”
“It’s a device that no matter what you attach to it … it will give you the energy.”
“He gets a visit late one night, two men in suits come talk to him … he has a heart attack, ambulance comes, they grab Sparky … he dies.”
“Soon after, a couple of black vans pull up. They take all his notes, every piece of equipment, and it just disappears.”
@TuckerCarlson@OMGTheWhyFiles
BREASTMILK
She thought she was studying milk.
What she uncovered was a conversation.
In 2008, evolutionary anthropologist Katie Hinde was working in a primate research lab in California, analyzing breast milk from rhesus macaque mothers. She had hundreds of samples and thousands of data points. Everything looked ordinary—until one pattern refused to go away.
Mothers raising sons produced milk richer in fat and protein.
Mothers raising daughters produced a larger volume with different nutrient balances.
It was consistent. Repeatable. And deeply uncomfortable for the scientific consensus.
Colleagues suggested error. Noise. Statistical coincidence.
But Katie trusted the data.
And the data pointed to a radical idea.
Milk is not just nutrition.
It is information.
For decades, biology treated breast milk as simple fuel. Calories in. Growth out. But if milk were only calories, why would it change depending on the sex of the baby?
Katie kept digging.
Across more than 250 mothers and over 700 sampling events, the story grew more complex. Younger, first-time mothers produced milk with fewer calories but significantly higher levels of cortisol—the stress hormone.
The babies who drank it grew faster.
They were also more alert, more cautious, more anxious.
Milk wasn’t just building bodies.
It was shaping behavior.
Then came the discovery that changed everything.
When a baby nurses, microscopic amounts of saliva flow back into the breast. That saliva carries biological signals about the infant’s immune system. If the baby is getting sick, the mother’s body detects it.
Within hours, the milk changes.
White blood cells surge.
Macrophages multiply.
Targeted antibodies appear.
When the baby recovers, the milk returns to baseline.
This was not coincidence.
It was call and response.
A biological dialogue refined over millions of years. Invisible—until someone thought to listen.
As Katie reviewed existing research, she noticed something unsettling. There were twice as many scientific studies on erectile dysfunction as on breast milk composition.
The first food every human consumes.
The substance that shaped our species.
Largely ignored.
So she did something bold.
She launched a blog with a deliberately provocative name: Mammals Suck Milk.
It exploded. Over a million readers in its first year. Parents. Doctors. Scientists. People asking questions research had skipped.
The discoveries kept coming.
Milk changes by time of day.
Foremilk differs from hindmilk.
Human milk contains over 200 oligosaccharides babies can’t digest—because they exist to feed beneficial gut bacteria.
Every mother’s milk is biologically unique.
In 2017, Katie brought this work to a TED stage. In 2020, it reached a global audience through Netflix’s Babies. Today, at Arizona State University’s Comparative Lactation Lab, she continues reshaping how medicine understands infant development, neonatal care, formula design, and public health.
The implications are staggering.
Milk has been evolving for more than 200 million years—longer than dinosaurs walked the Earth. What we once dismissed as simple nourishment is one of the most sophisticated communication systems biology has ever produced.
Katie Hinde didn’t just study milk.
She revealed that nourishment is intelligence.
A living, responsive system shaping who we become before we ever speak.
All because one scientist refused to accept that half the story was “measurement error.”
Sometimes the biggest revolutions begin by listening to what everyone else ignores.
California's Central Valley produces 80% of the world's almonds. Each almond requires 3.2 gallons of actual irrigation water to grow. Not rainfall. Actual tap water pumped from aquifers.
One gallon of almond milk requires 162 gallons of irrigation water. Compare that to dairy milk at 8 gallons of tap water per gallon, with the rest being rainfall that falls on pasture anyway.
But here's where it gets properly grim. Almonds bloom for exactly three weeks in February. During those three weeks, California needs every pollinating bee in North America transported to the Central Valley or the crop fails entirely.
Commercial beekeepers truck in 31 billion honeybees. That's two-thirds of America's entire managed bee population, all concentrated in one valley for three weeks. The bees are packed into trucks, driven across the country, dumped into almond groves drenched in pesticides, worked to exhaustion, then packed up and shipped to the next crop.
The mortality rate is catastrophic. Beekeepers report losing 30 to 50% of their hives annually. That's billions of bees dead. Not from natural causes. From being used as disposable pollination machines for your almond milk.
The pesticides don't help. Almond groves are sprayed with neonicotinoids which scramble bee navigation systems, fungicides which weaken their immune systems, and herbicides which eliminate the wildflowers they'd normally forage on between almond blooms.
Meanwhile the aquifer depletion is permanent. The Central Valley has sunk 28 feet in some areas from groundwater extraction. That water took 10,000 years to accumulate. It's being drained in decades for almond milk.
Your vegan latte killed more bees and used more water than a year's worth of dairy milk. But it's got "plant-based" on the label so you're definitely saving the planet.
A political party’s manifesto should be legally binding. When voted into power, if the policies outlined in their manifesto are not implemented within an adequate timeframe, or deviation is attempted. An immediate general election should be invoked, allowing the public to better hold governments accountable.
I will never forget or forgive this disgusting @BBCNews report claiming trans milk was just as good for babies as mothers’ milk.
Totally deranged, cultist behaviour.
@jeremycorbyn Jeremy - I couldn't give a shit about defending the 'humanity' of third world conmen who have broken into our country.
I want a society where British families can live without the fear of getting stabbed by a foreigner who should never have been allowed into Britain.
Alright?