What’s interesting is that Bitcoin’s original value proposition looked boring for years.
Then stablecoins showed up. Tokenization showed up. Yield showed up. Faster chains showed up. Everyone assumed Bitcoin would eventually be replaced by something better.
Now it might turn out that decentralization and neutrality were the only things that couldn’t be copied.
And that’s really what the article is about.
@LambofCrypto Thank you. fair point.
my argument isn't that bitcoin is private.
It's that everything else is becoming even more traceable, permissioned, and controlled. bitcoin doesn't need to be perfect. it just needs to be less permissioned than the alternatives.