Bryan Horsey

ᛒᚱᛁᚨᚾ ᚺᛟᚱᛊᛖᛁ
Purveyor of fine Kringle and Bourbon.
Liberty above all else! #wolfpack
Book -

[THE PARZIVAL @The1Parzival]

🪤🪤🪤
- If you think X got rid of Tweepcred, think again.

- It just got renamed to UserCredV2 and still uses your Mass Score that I discussed over 3 years ago.

- This was never an algorithm update, it was a rebranding scam to convince low IQ users that it's no longer censoring like Twitter was.

- The proof is in the pudding, or rather their own open sourced algorithm, that censorship is still 100% embedded into the code.

- Elon Musk's claim of free speech wasn't just a lie, it was scam because people paid money expecting to be seen.

- If you're still paying this scam artist then just know he is stealing from you all while you help him train his AI to further work against you.
🚬🚬🚬

[A variable of my ancestry @VoterIndy]

Everyone supporting flock and other mass surveillance is telling you that they are willing to violate your rights for their personal purpose.
You and your rights mean nothing to them as long as they get what they want.

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

LOL Even Grok knows Garrett’s address is PUBLIC INFORMATION IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN!!!

[Daniel Rood @DanielRood11]

@Support @X @elonmusk Are y'all gonna suspend Grok too? Bring back @4nt1p4tt3rn!

[Daniel Rood @DanielRood11]

@Support @X @elonmusk Are y'all gonna suspend Grok too? Bring back @4nt1p4tt3rn!

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

@Deadswan65 Yes to All

[Resist CBDC 🏁 @Resist_CBDC]

Mass digital surveillance is yet another attack vector on our Constitutional rights.

Flock CEO Garrett Langley belongs in prison.

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

@criticalcivil @mnsibley I am running low on new reads so if you have some good ones send them my way 😁

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

I am officially ready.

Set off the EMP just wipe it all out.

We need a reset.

[Duckie @albynospyder]

FACT 1:
Conservatives are for limited government.

FACT 2:
NO self respecting Conservatives is for mass surveillance.

FACT 3: FACT 2 is proven by FACT 1.

[Project for Privacy & Surveillance Accountability @savingprivacy]

New report details how state and local police across @NYgov use Flock's nationwide surveillance database on behalf of @ICEgov, including to locate drivers suspected of no crime.
https://t.co/XKd6H4L14p

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

@Tazerface16

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

Congress needs to pay attention to this. Very unfavorable and we remember the Patriot Act. Flock is no different

[Data for Progress @DataProgress]

NEW: Around two-thirds of voters have heard of Flock cameras. Overall, voters view the technology unfavorably by a -19-point margin.

[Data for Progress @DataProgress]

NEW: Around two-thirds of voters have heard of Flock cameras. Overall, voters view the technology unfavorably by a -19-point margin.

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

@uwukko That’s the funny part it ISN’T Private, it’s publicly accessible information in the public domain and they still get upset about “their privacy” Pure Hypocrisy

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

@LaNativePatriot Yes

[Caveman 🇺🇸 @thecavedaddy]

The very concept and design of flock cameras collides directly with the Constitution’s limits on government power.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ They are not a cop glancing at a plate in traffic. They are a permanent, automated archive of where people go. The fourth Amendment protects the people against unreasonable searches, and a search occurs when the government invades a reasonable expectation of privacy. After Carpenter v. United States and United States v. Jones, that expectation includes the whole of a person’s physical movements over time. A single public plate is visible; stitching thousands of those plates into a searchable history is not. The resulting “mosaic” can show where someone sleeps, which clinic they visit, which church they attend, and whom they meet. Police can run that history backward without a warrant, without probable cause, and often without even a real case number.

The Fifth Amendment compounds the problem through due process. The government may not deprive a person of liberty without fair process, yet Flock systems enroll every driver in a location dossier by default. There is no notice that a particular trip was logged, no hearing before an officer queries the file, and no reliable way to contest a bad hot list hit before it produces a stop. Automated alerts and officer-initiated searches can trigger seizures traffic stops, investigations, even federal look-ups based on data the driver never consented to compile and cannot meaningfully challenge. Forcing people to display a plate is one thing; converting that legal requirement into continuous, suspicionless self identification for a police database is another. When the state can reconstruct your movements at will and then use that reconstruction against you without a warrant or an adversarial check, it is not merely watching the public road. It is building a secret case file on the innocent and then deciding, after the fact, how to use it.

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

@Renagarcia1312 @JosieLewis2019 @deaflibertarian Flock IS facial recognition among other things. Sad you are eating up their lies.

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

So if Flock is being sold as “might maybe at some point” prevent a crime then we should be giving everyone a gun and National reciprocity.

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

@AnimasOutlaw @4nt1p4tt3rn Imagine being that retarded, that information is publicly accessible and NOT private! He is literally advocating against Flock but is too stupid to see if.

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

@criticalcivil @mnsibley If you haven’t read it, I highly recommend The Ranch, great series

[Bryan Horsey @bryanhorsey]

@criticalcivil @mnsibley Oh I have, that and more.