Single issue voter

#bitcoin,
#decentralisation at every level,
#POW is essential,
family & friends,
cold exposure,
sauna,
classical music,
nature,
low time preference,
discipline

[Hassan Mafi ‏ @thatdayin1992]

This you?

[Gerhardt vd Merwe @realgerhardtvdm]

📢🇺🇸 NEVER FORGET WIPED HISTORY:

U.S. soldiers stealing gold from the central Bank in Iraq in the name of democracy.

This video is BANNED 🚫

[Chay Bowes @BowesChay]

The Germans are complaining of "Direct threats from Russia?"

Heres a recording of senior German military officers including the head of ze Luftwaffe, planning how to bomb Russia's Kerch Bridge.

Wind Ze neck in Mein Liebling.

[Simon Dixon @SimonDixonTwitt]

Palantir.

"National service should be a universal duty. We should seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force."

The more troops, the more contracts.

The more contracts, the more revenue.

And yes Palantir executives are all Zionists.

Guess who supports those who make money from war?

And they want your children and family to join the attack force so you can be used to get corporate America more resources from their piracy.

One more thing.

The tools they build to terrorise globally, are also coming home ready to manufacture civil unrest.

They beta tested their open air prison in Gaza.

And civil unrest Surveillance tools in the UK.

It’s being rolled out across America.

This isn’t a company.

It’s your digital prison.

[Dr. Simon @goddek]

Laura Loomer absolutely HATES this video. Share it if you want to piss her off.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.

The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.

The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.

The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.

The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.

The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.

The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.

Now it is today.

Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.

He is confident.

He has always been confident.

The confidence has never been the problem.

The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

[Seyed Mohammad Marandi @s_m_marandi]

The idiot doesn't know that Trump's the idiot being referred to.

[Alice Weidel @Alice_Weidel]

22.500 Personen hat die CDU-geführte Regierung allein über den Familiennachzug in nur 3 Monaten nach Deutschland geholt, weitere 27.000 stellten Asylerstanträge. Seit nun 11 Jahren flutet die Union unser Sozialsystem, unterminiert die Sicherheit der Bürger und erzählt uns etwas von einer Migrationwende. Die wird es nur mit der AfD geben!

[Dan Bilzerian @DanBilzerian]

I’m number 1 in the world.

It’s rare in this life that you can be better than 8 billion people at anything.

Thank you Israel for appointing me the number 1 antisemite in the world, you absolute cunts.

🏴

[Iranian Force @MrImranPk]

Retweet if you believe Netanyahu is a war criminal.

[Carter Hughes @itscarterhughes]

🚨INSANE: Every single Minnesota House Democrat voted AGAINST fraud investigations into Tim Walz.

Every voter needs to see this.

Share this post to make it go viral.

Follow me: @ItsCarterHughes

[Suppressed Voices @supressedvoic]

Say Yes and pass it on.

[Steffen Unger @unger2701]

MOMA Moderator verschluckt sich an der eigenen Moral😂 Chrupalla macht ihn sprachlos!
Voll ins Blaue....😉

[Iran Army Media @IranArmyMedia]

America has not arrested a single pedophile mentioned in the Epstein files. Not a single girl got justice.

And these are the same Americans you want us to believe are worried about women in Iran.

They killed 168 girls between the ages of 7 and 12 in Iran.

[Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand]

France is on the eve of voting one of the most shameful laws in its history: it would effectively outlaw criticism of Israel and criminalize any speech seen as even remotely sympathetic to whoever the French government chooses to designate a "terrorist group."

In effect this law would turn France's foreign policy into unchallengeable dogma backed by prison time. You could literally be sent for 5 years in prison if you, for instance, call what France says are "terrorists" a "resistance group."

Think for instance Nelson Mandela during the apartheid (the ANC was on every Western terrorist list) or, heck, France's own Résistance against Nazi Germany - designated as "terrorists" by the Vichy regime and the Nazi occupation.

It's frankly absolutely insane.

The new law is called "loi Yadan" after its author Caroline Yadan, a MP who represents French expatriates living in Israel. The U.S. has congressmen paid by AIPAC: France has cut out the middleman entirely, we have MPs whose constituency is literally in Israel.

The law has already passed committee and heads to a full parliamentary vote on April 16th - 3 days from now - under a very unusual fast-track procedure. Seven of eleven parliamentary groups have said they'll vote yes and the law is expected to pass.

What does the law say? Let me quote from it directly (full text here: https://t.co/m03R4z0gX6):

1) Article 1 introduces the concept of "implicit" provocation to terrorism and punishes it with five years imprisonment and a fine of €75,000

That's the one I was speaking about. Under this provision, describing anyone France designates as terrorist as a "resistance movement" - the way France describes its own Résistance against Nazi occupation - could effectively become a crime.

The key concept is what does "implicit provocation to terrorism" mean? Nobody knows. And that's the point. It means whatever a prosecutor wants it to mean: a perfectly good case could be made that, for instance, quoting international law on the right of occupied peoples to resist with respect to Hamas is, in fact, "implicit provocation to terrorism."

France's most famous anti-terrorism judge, Marc Trévidic, says he has never seen anything like it in his entire career (https://t.co/CytQnuK3hS): "Implicit provocation to terrorism: do you realize what that means? Becoming a censor of other people's thoughts, trying to guess what a person really meant."

2) The same article also expands the terrorism apology offense to include "minimizing or trivializing acts of terrorism in an outrageous manner."

This is even crazier: until now, "apology of terrorism" meant actually expressing a favorable judgment of "terrorist acts" (which is already insane because, as we all know, one person's terrorist is another's freedom fighter).

Well, under this new provision, a judge could decide that providing context, explaining root causes, or insufficiently condemning an act amounts to "trivializing" terrorism - and that would now be punishable with 5 years in prison.

So, for instance, a history teacher explaining the origins of Hamas or Hezbollah is providing context - but a prosecutor could argue that contextualization is trivialization. The same reasoning could apply to a journalist, a researcher, or anyone on social media who says "yes, it was terrible, but here's why it happened." The "but" becomes a crime, as it is trivialization.

3) Article 4 expands Holocaust denial law

Under current French law, denying the Holocaust is already a crime. This provision extends that crime by specifying that contestation of crimes against humanity now includes, "whatever its formulation, a negation, minimization, or outrageous trivialization" of those crimes.

Again with "outrageous trivialization"! In this instance the very authors of the text - Caroline Yadan and her colleagues - explain their reasoning explicitly in the law's preamble (https://t.co/rIiYQbbk23): "Comparing the State of Israel to the Nazi regime would thereby be punishable as an outrageous trivialization of the Shoah."

So while the provision is written in general terms, its architects are openly saying what it's for: making it a crime to draw any parallel between Israel's actions and those of the Nazis.

4) Article 2 creates a brand new crime: calling for the destruction of a state.

The law adds to an existing 1881 press law a provision punishing anyone who "publicly, in disregard of the right of peoples to self-determination and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, calls for the destruction of a state recognized by the French Republic." Five years imprisonment, €75,000 fine.

The qualifiers about self-determination and the UN Charter are meant to sound reassuring. But what does "destruction" mean? In practice, if you advocate for a one-state solution where Israelis and Palestinians live as equals, you are de-facto calling for the "destruction" of the state of Israel. Well, that would now be punishable by 5 years in prison 🤷

There you go. Absolutely insane: if this new law passes, and it unfortunately very much looks like it will, France - the country that gave the world the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the country whose national identity is built on the Résistance - will have made it illegal to use the word 'resistance' about anyone the government doesn't like. Jean Moulin would be prosecuted. De Gaulle would be prosecuted.

The only people who wouldn't be prosecuted are those who stay silent. Which, of course, is the whole point.

[Ethan Levins 🇺🇸 @EthanLevins2]

Apple has removed Lebanese village names in Southern Lebanon.

As Israel invades, they are already setting the state to justify occupation.

I’ve never seen something like this.

[Naila Ayad🇵🇸 @Naila_Ayad]

Retweet for the sake of humanity!

[Apu @Apu_elrojo]

"El ejército más moral del mundo"

[RussiaNews 🇷🇺 @mog_russEN]

🚨⚡️ An American soldier throws a stun grenade at an Iraqi shepherd just for fun during the occupation of Iraq.

[Gabbar @Gabbar0099]

Lebanon 💔

One of the most widely shared videos worldwide.

Israel did this.