@oct7everyday Says the dude calling trans people mentally ill.
Congrats on making sure not a single trans person wants anything to do with your bullshit.
@DudleyNYC Your reading comprehension is…really not great. You should probably work on that.
But by all means, my dude, tie yourself as closely as possible to the guy who is currently pushing “alternative treatments” for measles. I’m sure it’ll work out great for you in the long run.
@DudleyNYC Bro, if you need me to “show my data”, you have no business running your mouth about this subject. Stick to things you know, dilettante.
P.S. - not everything is intended as an “argument”. Sometimes people are just expressing their contempt for you.
@DudleyNYC And yet you presumed when I said “proven treatments” I was using specific clinical language and not, you know, colloquial speech describing medicine that has been shown to be effective for decades. Interesting.
@DudleyNYC No, bro, it proves that I possess basic pattern recognition. Your whole shtick is just bad faith bigotry wearing the flayed skin of “rationality”
Also, did you complain about me “policing language” and then…literally turn around and do a semantic “well actually” about “proven”?
@DudleyNYC “Critical theory”. “Transgender ideology”.
My dude, people who are cool with trans people do not use thought-terminating cliches like “transgender ideology”.
As for the first part - that is total horseshit. “No such thing as proven treatment”. Get the fuck out of here.
@DudleyNYC Clearly you don’t, since you’re questioning the proven treatment that is literally older than organ transplants. You just don’t like that trans people exist. It makes you uncomfortable.
@DudleyNYC It’s like asking someone who thinks all vaccines are poison their opinion on vaccinating kids. It’s a complete waste of time, both because their priors make the answer obvious and because they’ve already demonstrated a colossal lack of judgment.
@DudleyNYC See? That right there means your opinion on this subject is worthless. One, it shows you’re willing to ignore evidence, and two, it displays your hostility towards established medical care. Of COURSE you’re going to oppose care for kids; it’s your ideology.