BREAKING: No, ChatGPT did not “help the shooter kill kids.”
The lawsuit DOES NOT allege that.
Here’s what the actual claims say (not the exaggerated clickbait you’re parroting):
✔️ The moderation system flagged concerning comments for human review.
✔️ OpenAI employees recognized imminent risk and recommended alerting authorities.
✔️ Leadership chose not to escalate to police.
✔️ The only response taken was banning one account, which didn’t prevent the shooter from creating another.
Nowhere does the complaint say:
💥 “AI encouraged or taught the shooter to kill.”
💥 “AI was her partner in crime.”
💥 “AI gave her the plan.”
That’s you making up a story, not the plaintiffs.
So let’s cut the nonsense: If you want to criticize OpenAI’s choices, fine, do it with the actual text in front of you, but don’t pretend a lawsuit is alleging something it isn’t just to score PR points for Grok or yourself.
Facts matter.
Reality matters.
Truth matters.
Stop repeating unverified spin.