A short history of CELL to commemorate the 20th anniversary of CELL Press acquisition by Elsevier!
"Commercial Exploitation of Laboratory Labor" was first published in 1976. The name was shortened to its acronym CELL in 1988, after which it was purchased by Elsevier in 1999.
@RrrPeeSRC@prewittse@CharlesMBrenner Dave leverages his Harvard appointment to become the expert to the non-expert. Harvard is ok with this because he brings in money. Dave offers rich people the one thing they want but don’t have - immortality.
📢Bored with science? Tired of getting desk rejections? Do you want to be the one doling out desk rejections? If answers are yes, yes, & yes. Cell Metabolism is hiring! Full-time editor wanted in our THREE China offices. Please reach around! https://t.co/6a5639FDhK
RT
📢Bored with science? Tired of getting desk rejections? Do you want to be the one doling out desk rejections? If answers are yes, yes, & yes. Cell Metabolism is hiring! Full-time editor wanted in our THREE China offices. Please reach around! https://t.co/6a5639FDhK
RT
The Yale MMPC (Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center)–Live is recruiting external advisors from historically marginalized backgrounds – please see the flyer and consider joining us!
As more researchers bale on science to become professional editors the question arises how many professional editors do we really need? Many argue they are not needed at all.
https://t.co/8hrDogqDWH
As more researchers bale on science to become professional editors the question arises how many professional editors do we really need? Many argue they are not needed at all.
https://t.co/8hrDogqDWH
There would be a lot more money for Grad students if journals didn't charge ridiculous publication fees and have massive paywalls. $12k for open access!
@mumumouse2 These authors used a program our own Stuhl Sofner developed called "e unum pluribus" - out of one, many. E unum pluribus eliminates biological and analytical variation in silico by copying one cell and pasting it over many.
@metapredict @JamilCellTech @OxygenIvan This repository is a great resource for scientists. If a scientist generates data consistent with the repository then it can be cited. If a scientist's data is inconsistent with the repository, well its only 5 rats and you can discard it.
@mumumouse2@PLOSONE MuMu you do know that Elsevier publishes PLOS journals are decoys to keep predators like you away from our flagship journal Cell Onion.