We wouldn't need Bitcoin:
- If we could trust banks
- If we could trust people
- If we could trust the government
But we can't. That's why we need Plan ₿
🔻 YOUR BODY WAS ALWAYS CAPABLE OF REGROWING TEETH. THE GENE WAS NEVER MISSING. IT WAS SUPPRESSED. JAPAN JUST PROVED IT BY UNBLOCKING IT WITH A SINGLE INJECTION.
In September 2024, Kyoto University began human trials on a drug that regrows teeth in adults. One injection. New teeth in 9 weeks. No implants. No dentures. No surgery.
The drug deactivates USAG-1 — a protein that blocks tooth regeneration. Remove the block, the tooth grows. Like it was always meant to.
The question nobody is asking: what activated USAG-1 in the first place?
A former molecular biologist — 11 years in a dental research lab funded by one of the three largest implant manufacturers:
"We identified in 2011 that fluoride accumulation in jaw tissue amplifies USAG-1 expression by up to 340%. The more fluoride in the bone, the stronger the suppression. We submitted the paper. Rejected by every journal in 6 weeks. Funding pulled 3 months later. I was told the direction was 'not commercially viable.'"
Not commercially viable. Because dental implants generate $5.4 billion per year. Dentures: $3.8 billion. Root canals: $15 billion. A $24 billion industry built on the assumption that teeth do not grow back.
They did not discover regeneration in 2024. They suppressed it for decades. A mouth that heals itself does not need a dentist every 6 months.
Fluoride calcifies the pineal gland. Fluoride suppresses tooth regeneration. Fluoride was added to your water in 1945. The same decade they built the dental insurance industry.
⟁
Your teeth were designed to regenerate. Something stopped them. Now you know what. Share this.
UK Police slam a White boy onto the ground, choke him & tell him to stop being a bitch after HE was just attacked.
Poor kid was hysterical & just kept asking what he had done wrong.
There is something very wrong with the UK & their Police force.
White Kids are not safe from foreign criminals or Police. When they are harmed the Police just traumatise them further.
Police are supposed to serve & Protect the community not terrorise them.
Think about this…
Over $600,000 was raised on GiveSendGo for Karmelo Anthony’s “legal defense fund.”
But instead of hiring a lawyer?
He filed as indigent and got a public defender.
Meanwhile: Dad’s new Escalade, Karmelo’s new Lexus, stacks of expensive sneakers, and the family moved into a million-dollar gated house.
Donors got scammed.
How are they feeling now? 😂
#KarmeloAnthony #GiveSendGoScam #JusticeForAustin #WokeGrift
What do you think? 👇
A Muslim worker forced Japanese staff to wash the whole kitchen seven times because of pork.
This isn’t a small request. They’re making regular employees do pointless extra work just to follow Islamic rules.
And this is becoming more common in places pushing halal.
Halal certification often gets government money too, so Japanese taxpayers end up paying for the extra hassle.
If you hire Muslims, expect these kinds of demands.
They don’t adjust to Japan — they expect Japan to adjust to them. Seven washes because someone touched pork? It’s ridiculous.
Japan doesn’t owe any religion this level of accommodation.
If you can’t work in a normal environment without making everything about your religion, maybe you shouldn’t be here.
Crime goes up. They defund the police. Schools fail. They add more administrators. The border breaks down. They ask for more budget. Failure is never punished in government. It’s rewarded with more funding.
Incredible. From now on phones, laptops and other electronics of new asylum seekers will no longer be screened as part of the asylum procedure, because the Dutch authorities say there’s “no legal framework” for it.
The system always puts the “rights” of asylum seekers above the safety of native Europeans.
With the @SaveEuropeAct we will change that once and for all.
Make no mistake: Under-16 social media bans and "online safety" laws are a Trojan horse for the rollout of digital ID infrastructure for everyone.
No government can prevent children under sixteen from accessing a website, an app, a feature or a device unless a digital checkpoint is erected for everybody. The only way to establish who is a child is to first establish who is not.
That means identity checks for children and adults alike. The system cannot reliably determine whether a user is over sixteen without demanding proof. A passport scan. A driving licence. A digital ID.
Dress it up in benevolent-sounding euphemisms like "age assurance", "online safety" or "child protection" all you want. The operational requirement is the same—users must identify themselves in order to be allowed through the gate.
Which is why the language around these laws is so carefully chosen. Politicians rarely admit outright that they are building an identity checkpoint for the internet. Instead, they claim to be protecting children from pornography, self-harm content, addictive design, harmful algorithms, or whatever else is useful to drive the legislation through.
The child is the sympathetic case used to win public consent. The adult is the one being conditioned to produce credentials to access the digital public square. The objective is not really to protect children from adult material, but to make identity-gated internet access feel routine, responsible and inevitable.
And once that precedent has been established, the category of content requiring verification can expand without any serious redesign of the system.
Pornography becomes social media. Social media becomes video sharing. Video sharing becomes search. Search becomes messaging. Messaging becomes payments. Payments become banking. Banking becomes public services. Public services become the minutiae of everyday life.
At each increment, the expansion is sold as limited, proportionate and necessary. At each stage, opposition is framed as harmful to children, society, public health, or national security. The justification shifts according to the emergency of the day. The digital identity infrastructure embeds itself into every category of daily activity.
Once digital ID becomes the price of entry for social participation, it does not stay confined to the original pretext that introduced it. It becomes a general-purpose control system. A way to decide who may access which service, under what conditions, with what level of monitoring, and with what consequences for falling out of good standing.
At that point, digital ID is no longer a tool for keeping children away from harmful content. It is the operating system for a controlled society. And the question is no longer whether you are old enough to access a website. It is whether the system deems you eligible to participate in society at all.
>ask for permit to build mosque
>city says no
>build it anyway
>invite Pakistani ambassador to cut the ribbon
>gloat on TV about how Japan won’t do shit
>get shut down for building an illegal building with no permit or inspection
>cry on TV that Japan is racist
lmao
>be 15 year old girl
>kidnapped, held in a flat above a takeaway
>they're all sitting around after a "session"
>middle of summer so they're all shirtless
>high on balloons, they forget about me
>somehow still got my phone
>2% battery, now or never
>decide this is my one shot
>sneak a couple photos of their faces, tattoos and the flat to send to the police or my mum
>hit send
>phone immediately goes full retard:
>"This photo contains nudity or sensitive content. Blurred for your protection."
>try to unblur it
>"To view or share this content you must verify your identity with a government ID or face scan."
>desperate, try the face scan
>"Your phone has now been locked for your safety. Please see your parent or guardian. Alternatively verify with a government ID or face scan"
>can't even keep the photo on the device
>can't send it
>can't do anything
>this is now my new life
Άμα παρατήσεις δυο γατάκια σε οικόπεδο έχει 60.000 πρόστιμο.
Ο άλλος που έτρεχε με τη BMW στη Ρόδο και θέρισε μάνα και κόρη, βγήκε έξω με 50.000€ .
Μόνο σε μένα φαίνεται παράλογο όλο αυτό;
George Orwell’s 1984 was published today in 1949.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”