ConsMilitia

'A well regulated Militia' is constitutional 'homeland security' based upon 'the right of the people to keep and bear Arms'—#2ndAmendment #2A

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

The #2A has been warning "the people" #2A for a long time that "the security of a free State" #2A is ultimately their own responsibility—but they must be organized in the governmental institutions "necessary" #2A for that purpose—"well regulated Militia" #2A

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@wasdawasda2 @JackLeeRoberts @Yordanarchist @Lunnski @WalshFreedom Each State—to fulfill her constitutional responsibility—must exercise her reserved power to arm & train her citizens for "homeland security"—what the #2A refers to as "the security of a free State" #2A

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@JackLeeRoberts @Yordanarchist @Lunnski @WalshFreedom The Constitution does not say the POTUS is "necessary"#2A —or "Congress" or "voting"

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@JackLeeRoberts @Yordanarchist @Lunnski @WalshFreedom "voters expressing their will" will never, and can never provide the people with "security"#2A

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@JackLeeRoberts @Yordanarchist @Lunnski @WalshFreedom If "the people"#2A paid attention to the ENTIRE #2A & stopped disregarding the "Militia"#2A—they would learn the constitutional means to enforce their immunity from many infringements, not just firearms.

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@JackLeeRoberts @Yordanarchist @Lunnski @WalshFreedom Not if you want to live in "a free State" #2A

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@JackLeeRoberts @Yordanarchist @Lunnski @WalshFreedom School shootings, for example, would be policed through the militia structure, not general disarmament colored as "sensible gun laws".

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@Yordanarchist @JackLeeRoberts @Lunnski @WalshFreedom Actually, you would be required to be armed as well as the average army infantryman of the era—those arms would be procured through the free market.

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@Yordanarchist @JackLeeRoberts @Lunnski @WalshFreedom The Constitution prevents each & every level of government from setting itself up as superior & antagonistic to the citizenry as a whole.

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@JackLeeRoberts @Yordanarchist @Lunnski @WalshFreedom Each State—to fulfill her constitutional responsibility—must exercise her reserved power to arm & train her citizens for "homeland security"—what the #2A refers to as "the security of a free State" #2A

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@JackLeeRoberts @Yordanarchist @Lunnski @WalshFreedom The particular ‘Arms’ that WE THE PEOPLE had in mind in the late 1700s were the ‘Arms’ carried by light infantrymen as Congress reaffirmed by law 1792, 1874, 1887 and 1900.

Anyone can do the homework and learn this.

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@JackLeeRoberts @Yordanarchist @Lunnski @WalshFreedom For the bloody, chronicled history of "gun control", see— Rudolph J. Rummel, "Death by Government" (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 1994).

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@JackLeeRoberts @Yordanarchist @Lunnski @WalshFreedom Anyone concerned with mass "gun killings" should reject "gun control" outright as unconstitutional. Especially since during the first 80 years of the Twentieth Century alone, “governments” killed some 170 million people. Facilitated by "gun control”.

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@JackLeeRoberts @Yordanarchist @Lunnski @WalshFreedom "Assault rifles” are “modern Militia rifles” —which is why "the people" #2A must be armed & trained with them according to law—"well regulated Militia" #2A

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@JackLeeRoberts @Yordanarchist @Lunnski @WalshFreedom

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@kacdnp91 Constitutional “homeland security” is “A well regulated Militia” based upon “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” (2nd Amendment).

https://t.co/FjIChm4yUH

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

@Petrina1864586 @goneers @seanmdav Constitutional “homeland security” is “A well regulated Militia” based upon “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” (2nd Amendment).

https://t.co/FjIChm56Kf

[ConsMilitia @CONSMILITIA]

“The government * * * of the United States, can claim no powers which are not granted to it by the constitution”,[1] “powers not granted are prohibited”.[2]

1.) Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee, 14 U.S. (1 Wheaton) 304, 326 (1816). Accord, McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheaton) 316, 405 (1819).
2) United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 68 (1936).