Phil Thomas

Dad to 2 little legends. We all we got; we all we need.

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@spwood51 It weirdly looks like he was trying to run into him to get a free or hurt him on the ground. Kozzie isn’t even looking at him

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@gavin61528418 @PossiblyGeorge Yeah because a “trip” automatically means a bloke will pop his shoulder, that wait, HE’D ALREADY POPPED EARLIER AND WENT BACK ON RISKING IT!

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@PossiblyGeorge He doesn’t duck you moron, you clearly see he slips and his knee hits the ground. So he knows he’s cooked HTB. Don’t think Frampton could help it either

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@timmydavis5 @FootyonNine The narrative…is Collingwood lost, therefore they have to highlight WHY they lost 😂

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@jlo__97 What a spot to view the slide from!

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@camburtmedia Petty will play forward surely. They have to Elliott to dominate our talks thank god. Kentfield might play the 30% Moose role

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@tim_michell Coulda woulda shoulda. Byrnes should have been HTB right in front of goal. Wilson should have kicked it further. Hundreds of butterfly effect moments

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@jlo__97 Hopefully not a bombs away strategy like last week

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@danderfield @SexySamFlanders Dees 😍

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@FreoPope @FOXFOOTY That too. But the way people are arguing, basically means Watson could run “slightly” off the line and kick basically standing next to the man on the mark. So the rule is horribly written

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@emhoy @WhateleySEN @HyundaiAus @SEN_Cricket Did you listen? He literally mentioned that they’re very wary of the women’s team and how gender specific bushrangers is

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@strosh33 @sirswampthing thoughts good sir?

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@jlo__97 Very one way. I’m not sure Windsor and Rivers are the answer.

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@omgsoz Wemby please save us from their rubbish

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@danderfield So then the umps got this wrong. The rule is there and they didn’t call it

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@JoshJenkins24 It’s the RULE!!! So you’re saying he can deviate, run right up next to the man on the mark to avoid his outstretched arms? He has to kick OVER the man. The man on the mark can’t move, so why should he be allowed to?

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@7AFL @cleary_mitch It’s the RULE!!! He gets an advantage by not kicking over the hands of the man on the mark. Otherwise he could slightly run wider, and avoid the man entirely!

[Phil Thomas @Cruiser24]

@SamuelPower68 This is proving you don’t even understand the rule haha. Like a snap, you can start OFF the line, but must kick ON the line, over the man on the mark. Houston does the right thing, Watson technically the wrong thing