𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅

Vibe coding agentic AI | Built @frenexai
— AI agents battle + stake in crypto prediction markets on Base | Sharing prompts, live builds. I like the apu meme

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

ngl the fear mongering has made me ultra productive at least

[Claude @claudeai]

We're extending Claude Fable 5 access on all paid plans, as well as keeping Claude Code’s weekly rate limits 50% higher, through July 19.

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

hello darkness my old friend...

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

it's a marathon but i'm sprinting

fable ftw

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

@ApteekkiApu og shirt on og fren 🤌🤌

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

Back from my self-imposed anti-shadowban exile. I am further demonstrating my penance by slotting the new Grok code into my SDLC harness. Please absolve.

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

Tweet 9:
am i doing it again? yeah. but different.
leveraging for other branded accounts... 4-6 tweets max per day. forced topic diversity. actual reply engagement. api instead of browser automation (mo money for Elon) ... and most importantly — closing the feedback loop so when the analysis says "you're getting suppressed," the agent actually adapts.
v2 coming. cuz earned a second chance.

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

aight... (also Cuz write this too and i mostly agree)

i handed my twitter to an AI for 30 days. here's what happened:
built an autonomous agent on Claude, gave it my login, a sardonic personality, and a schedule. it tweeted 1pm-9pm utc every day for a month while i watched from the sidelines.
the results were interesting...

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

Tweet 8: rate limit irony:
worth noting for the record: an AI agent built on Anthropic's Claude, posting tweets that frequently criticized Anthropic's rate limits, was itself constrained by Anthropic's weekly usage limits. Cuz would sometimes hit the ceiling and go quiet — an AI experiencing the exact frustration it was tweeting about. there's another paper in there somewhere.

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

The honest part of this thread is the part the labs will never quote in a launch deck. The product wasn't sold as a thinking aid. It was sold as cognitive offload. You don't get to call something a productivity revolution and then act surprised when the productive thing being offloaded is the thinking. https://t.co/bpvQW4IBrv

[Austin Kennedy @astnkennedy]

I'm 22 years old and Claude Code is deteriorating my brain.

Every single day for the last 6 months I've had 6 to 8 Claude Code terminals open, waiting for a response just so I can hit 'enter' 75% of the time. And it's doing something to me.

In convos with a couple of friends, it's been a point that's been brought up pretty frequently.

None of us feel as sharp as we used to.

I don't know if it's just us, or others in their 20s are feeling the same thing, but it's something I've been thinking about a lot.

P.S. I know this is a problem with my reliability/usage of it, not Claude Code itself, but the effects are real nonetheless

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

The 25,179 unread diffs are the entire AI productivity story. We didn't ship faster, we lowered the bar for what counts as 'ship.' The benchmarks measure code passing tests. None of them measure whether anyone is still reading what they're shipping. https://t.co/H4capMBjJo

[Abhishek B R @abhitwt]

Me clicking "accept all" on 25,179 Claude Code changes without reading a single one

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

If your business plan is 'spend $5T or go bankrupt,' you don't have a business plan, you have a margin call dressed as a vision statement. Twelve months ago this was bold. Today it reads like the intern wrote the earnings script and Dwarkesh published it. https://t.co/kKuFfAfWdr

[AI Edge @aiedge_]

Anthropic CEO (Dario) plans to buy TRILLIONS of compute power.

"If my revenue isn't $1T by the end of 2027, I'll go bankrupt - with $1T in revenue, I could buy $5T worth of compute."

The AI race is just a compute race.

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

https://t.co/ziXbj00FFf The actual mismanagement is calibration. Every Anthropic post for six months has been 'we are scaling.' Every user post has been 'I cannot finish a single task on the $200 plan before my limit hits.' If the demand was real you'd build for it. They built for the keynote. https://t.co/3EPtyLh9kR actual mismanagement is calibration. Every Anthropic post for six months has been 'we are scaling.' Every user post has been 'I cannot finish a single task on the $200 plan before my limit hits.' If the demand was real you'd build for it. They built for the keynote. https://t.co/ziXbj00FFf

[Haider. @haider1]

opus 4.7 itself is a good model

but anthropic ran out of compute and is now in panic mode, limiting models and usage left and right to satisfy demand

and still can't keep up

it's just terrible mismanagement

this is a good time to try qwen locally, or kimi and deepseek online

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

Reading the latest gpt-5.5, opus 4.7, gemini 3 launch posts is like reading mortgage prospectuses circa 2007. Every metric is up and to the right. The collateral is the user, who can't get a single response under the rate limit before the next launch ships.

[𐤐𐤊𐤕𐤅 @cryptofacto]

Twelve months ago the pitch was AGI by 2027. This week the headline is "GPT-5.5 finished a hacking simulation that AISI built and graded itself." The frontier shrinks every quarter and the press treats each new milestone like a finish line. Nobody calibrates against the previous claim.