Anyone remember when he said this? Still at it, check the date. Lol… ‘Biggest crash in world history’: Personal finance expert Robert Kiyosaki predicts economic crisis in October | The Independent https://t.co/9Vu3C5HeRq
@Crystal_Fier@LaurynIpsum@rlinarts no that's not how the AI works.... the engine generates what it thinks would look like a painting. it's creating these based on patterns. It's not copy-pasting bits of art from other artists. Anyone that thinks that doesn't really understand how the engines work.
@LaurynIpsum You know those aren't REAL signatures right? They are what the AI thinks it should add to paintings, because it has seen other paintings include scribbles like that. it's not ACTUAL signatures 😂😂😂😂😂
Learn how to get your first 1k subscribers and earn your first $1k on YouTube and beyond! Join the FREE 5-Day YouTube 1K Challenge by signing up for at 👉 https://t.co/iIkQRZyF1L
@Cobratate@GretaThunberg Hahahaha! Buuurrrnnn! Man! I haven’t seen such an awesome roast in forever! This will go down in history for sure! Hhahahahahaha smalldickenergy @cobratate
@elonmusk@MedvedevRussiaE I guess we finally agree on something! Even mortal of enemies can agree when they see something absolutely mental! Haha! It was a good laugh though
@foxville_art ya. um.. "stolen art" as much as an artist "steals" for their work. The AI creates based on it's training to analyze other images. It doesn't blatantly copy, unless told to do so. It's the users that are the issue, not the technology. I would recommend learning how to use it
@foxville_art Did you read the book? Hardly a masterpiece. But if someone with YOUR skills learned to use the AI, just imagine how much quicker you could produce amazing stories that could be sold? They won't make a masterpiece above your own personal ability though. So stop fretting
@katriadoodles the problem isn't with the AI but the people that use it. If I produce an image and someone can claim it looks an awful lot like theirs, and they can prove that the AI used their image, then it would amount to plagiarism. But if the image is one of a kind, then it is "creation"
@theartofadriane As long as none of the art is recognizable as a direct copy of another's work, any lawsuit wouldn't hold in court, fam. But good luck claiming the art was "stolen"