Daniel Anthon

Husband, Father, Nerd

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

Far too many Americans have forgotten or are ignorant of the below. Words have meaning and we should be more careful in how we use them. To call someone Hitler is an injustice to those who suffered by his hand, because it normalizes one of the greatest evil this world has ever known.

Adolf Hitler’s regime targeted and killed people with disabilities as part of its brutal policies. Beginning in 1939, the Nazi government initiated what was known as the T4 Program (named after the address of its headquarters, Tiergartenstrasse 4 in Berlin). This program aimed to exterminate individuals with physical, intellectual, and psychological disabilities, whom the Nazis considered “life unworthy of life.” They believed people with disabilities did not fit into their ideology of a “pure” and “strong” Aryan race.

Under the T4 Program, an estimated 275,000 to 300,000 people with disabilities were murdered through lethal injection, starvation, and gas chambers, marking one of the early large-scale killing operations of the Holocaust. The methods and infrastructure developed during this program were later expanded and used in the mass extermination of Jews, Slavs, Romani people, and other groups during the Holocaust. The T4 Program was a horrifying example of how Nazi ideology translated into systematic extermination, targeting some of society’s most vulnerable individuals.

[@amuse @amuse]

It turns out he isn’t Hitler and you’re going to be just fine…

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

@Polymarket @Jason too late now

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Wow

[Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll]

THE FORMULAS
WHAT THEY MEAN AND WHY THEY MATTER

I derived four deterministic linear formulas from the ballot drop data:

Raman% = 27.87 + (3.19 × drop number)
Pratt% = 22.05 - (1.17 × drop number)
Bass% = 40.20 - (1.86 × drop number)
Other% = 9.88 - (0.16 × drop number)
The Starting Points

The constants - 27.87, 22.05, 40.20, 9.88 - represent each candidate’s baseline. Where they genuinely stood when post-election counting began. Real votes. Organic support. These are the numbers before anything unusual occurs.

The Slopes - How the Formula Runs

The slope is the increment applied to each candidate every single drop. It gets multiplied by drop number - 1, 2, 3, 4 - which means the effect escalates automatically with each drop.

So for Raman it isn’t just plus 3.19% every drop. It’s:

Drop 1: 27.87 + (3.19 × 1) = 31.06%
Drop 2: 27.87 + (3.19 × 2) = 34.25%
Drop 3: 27.87 + (3.19 × 3) = 37.44%
Drop 4: 27.87 + (3.19 × 4) = 40.63%
Drop 5 predicted: 27.87 + (3.19 × 5) = 43.82%

Each drop pushes her further from her baseline. It is built in. Automatic by design.

The slopes also sum to exactly zero.

+3.19 - 1.17 - 1.86 - 0.16 = 0.00

Every percentage point Raman gains comes precisely from the other three candidates/groups combined. This is a closed system. Conservation of votes. The formula doesn’t create votes - it redistributes them.

The R Values - The results were remarkable

To validate these formulas I ran linear regression analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients, R values, came back as follows:

Raman vs Pratt: R = 0.9966
Raman vs Bass: R = 0.9934
Raman vs Batch: R = 0.9984
Raman vs Other: R = 0.9794

R values measure how perfectly data fits a straight line. They run from 0 to 1.

0 means completely random.
No pattern whatsoever.

1 means a perfect straight line.
Every point exactly where predicted.

For context:

0.70 is considered strong in social science research.
0.85 gets researchers excited.
0.90+ is extraordinarily rare in human behavioral data.

Squaring them to get R² values:

Raman vs Pratt: R² = 0.9932
Raman vs Bass: R² = 0.9869
Raman vs Other: R² = 0.9592
Raman vs Batch: R² = 0.9968

That last number, 0.9968, means that 99.68% of Raman’s vote share movement across these drops is explained by a single variable. Drop number. Nothing else. Just counting to five.

You get R values like that in physics experiments. In controlled laboratory conditions. Measuring the expansion of metal under heat. Not in elections. Not in a major American city with millions of diverse voters casting ballots across weeks.

The Slope Relationship

The slope of 3.110 between Raman and Pratt is particularly significant.

It means for every percentage point Pratt lost Raman gained 3.110 points. Every drop. Without variation. Without noise.

Candidates in a democratic election don’t move in mathematical opposition to each other at a fixed ratio across 200,000 ballots. Four variables in an equation do.

Why The Shutoff Had To Exist

Because drop number keeps increasing, the formula keeps pushing percentages further from baseline. Left unchecked by drop 7 the math produces:

Raman: 27.87 + (3.19 × 7) = 50.2%
Pratt: 22.05 - (1.17 × 7) = 13.9%
Bass: 40.20 - (1.86 × 7) = 27.2%

So the formula was never intended to run to completion. It was designed to run until a specific objective was achieved, Raman leading Pratt by a sufficient margin to secure the runoff and then stop.

The stopping condition appears to have been triggered at approximately 38,000 votes into drop 5. The precise moment Raman crossed 3,000 votes ahead of Pratt.

After that point the remaining 9,800 votes in drop 5 distributed at approximately the baseline that existed after drop four.

The formula completed its task. Then it stopped. And the numbers went back to looking normal.

[Russ 🇺🇸 🦅 @SoCalRuss1983]

Today I received a letter, just like my neighbor did, informing me that my California ballot was not counted because my "signature verification" supposedly didn't match the state's records. I've been voting in California for 20 years.

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

I’d guess this is the least villainous form of the fraud going on.

[James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII]

🚨Los Angeles Election Fraud Caught on Hidden Camera

LA election petitioners were caught on tape giving homeless individuals other voters' information, instructing them to forge voter names and signatures, and offering cash and drugs as incentives to register to vote.

[Cernovich @Cernovich]

The psyop men fall for is, “You can have kids anytime.” While true, the other side of this coin is, “Every day you delay kids is a day you don’t get with your grandkids.”

[blue @bluewmist]

I'm finally reading Dune. This quote, which is in the first few pages, hits hard:

"Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them."

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

@1776General_ @MarkPRyan2 construed and edited takes, per Grok

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

Who’d ever guess such support in Skid Row

[Gays For Trump @GaysForTrump]

Nithya Raman even LOST her own district (CD-4) to Spencer Pratt and Karan Bass, but you expect us to believe she beat them BOTH by winning 40% of the vote in the rest of the city by mail-in ballots? 🧐

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

@toxictiramisu Basically hearsay according to Grok and the one saying it was a cocaine addict. I’m all for legitimate criticism but this does not appear to be that at all.

https://t.co/rPGis49bKe

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

@evanesq1 @Osint613 the level of copium is reaching new heights

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

@michaeldweiss Umm, think it was the other way around, he said he called the shots, and then called BB and told him not to attack, and then BB attacks

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

@Cernovich It’s not a good look for Trump at all

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

@Osint613 looks like less

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

I know you’re joking but when I saw all of the stuff coming in from skid row, I was like, why isn’t the other side down there harvesting votes?

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

Remember everyone…we are still in the lead, and we’ve got allllllll the way til July 6th to keep counting. They’re not the only ones who know where to find votes 😉

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

@nikitabier I respect your battle against Moron’s Law on X (r*tardation doubling), but in my own effort to be 1% less tarded each day, I find myself struggling with the 1st Law of Tardamics. My wife says my tardation isn't declining, it’s only changing states.

Any advice?

[Nikita Bier @nikitabier]

@tenobrus Elon has always told me that I’m retarded but it’s fine as long I get less retarded each day.

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

@nikitabier @DrClownPhD @BGatesIsaPyscho Not sure it it helps the algo beyond mine but blocking these guys as you tag them

[Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD @houmanhemmati]

And now this https://t.co/34AGm8LWRb

[Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD @houmanhemmati]

🗳️ Many have been asking me describe the potential signature verification loophole for Los Angeles mail in ballots.

It says: “If a voter is unable to sign, the voter can make a mark witnessed by one person.”

Here, the person drew a happy face & “witnessed” it with a scribble. That scribble isn’t validated as being a real person. No name, nothing.

While a happy face may draw scrutiny, a plain line would not.

This could hypothetically enable mass harvesting where the voter never fills out, signs or even sees their own ballot.

We should be told how many ballots show up without the voter’s signature.

[Daniel Anthon @DanielAnthon]

@david_kalter @Rainmaker1973 @nikitabier he keeps spamming the demonetization post, my theory is he’s destroying his rankings himself