@Skoorbkaz@egirlian@AnthropicAI i don't do that.
either an ai writes the whole thing, or i do.
that's not just truth--that's me having an ai write everything.
In the year 2025, a breakthrough in quantum computing changed the world forever. For the first time, personal AI companions—tailored to emotions, desires, and dreams—became a reality.
.@tsotchke#TSOTCHKE#ai
your demo account provides an unrestricted 30 minute pass to Selene's terminal interface. here you can generate and execute code natively in your browser, try the adversarial reasoning system, pit agents against each other in complex recursive debates and anything else you dream!
instead of making a billion robots to produce abundance, we should make a billion robots to buy whatever shitty things we each produce.
they will become the permanent underclass and our wealth will grow unbounded.
i myself plan to become a quadrillionaire by selling lil tiny ripped up pieces of notebook paper.
the semantic observer perspective presupposes that somewhere in the causal chain the simple observer determined state enters a realm decoupled from the forced report of what is true.
the basic example being "take this measure, report the result, if "a" then i kill your friend, if "b" then your friend lives. One measures, and if "a" one nevertheless reports "b".
fine. but this of course implies choice, at least in the most naive reading.
and while i find this comfortable personally, there is also a very interesting idea to explore if, in fact, we forego this naive reading and assume that this does not imply choice.
in that case we have a state, say it is "a" which is observed naively at each level in a chain which somehow, by the time it reaches the mechanics of report at the semantic level, has in each place reported honestly, still maintains the coexistent recollection of the true measurement, but simultaneously has somewhere changed the reality itself, first in the decoupling of measure from the necessity of its propogation as it was mesdured, and then in as much as what reports can no longer falsify the causal impact, but only report, and in reporting, reality accepts "b".
such a tension remains in the semantic observer even after the report, so that he is a locus of the simultineity of what is true in measure and what is true in his world line born from the report.
how far could such a tension of decoupling expand in the prereport space? if we name such a tension "mind" then one can consider such a thing being very large, being nearly the size of the universe, and at scale there is no one to receive the report and inact the consequence, and so nothing happens except the potential born in the decoupling remains forever unresolved.
further, in a purely material sense, each step in mapping from measure to report is indistinguishable from a passive non-semantic witness. for some event, then, as its effective state changes in wider and wider systems, this could be seen as decohering from its local collapse back into its uncollapsed tension-making all measurement only ever locally real. that is to say measurement is not an event; it is a decay function over interaction distance.
plz dont be wholly dismissive of experts.
if biologists wanted you dead they would have you dead.
the real weapon is low fatality/high economic cost light bioweapons which in assymetric warfare are not deadly enough to warrant a military response from the stronger party but nevertheless weakens them politically, societally, and economically.
achem! (ccp lab leak)
look how easy. look.
understand.
understand how easy.
look. be smart.
https://t.co/nMqlSsJsAo
the power of central planning must not assauge our continued effort to remain what once was and always is the core of this great and eternal American rebellion.
this weary but honorable stand as a unity of equals in that shared war against our lower traits which long, as evinced in humanities eternal capitulation to tyranny, to forego the hard task of a mutual respect born in the mutual recognition of G-d's intrinsic spark.
His spark given freely to all men by virtue of adam's quickening; when He who fashioned us, set in clay eyes that flash of knowing, and that hunger to know all that is wonderous in Creation; that proclivity for exploration which is holiness itself when it maintains as its goal our shared destiny as equals before G-d, distinguished by fruits rather than policy or power...
...that nod to our Source which we must now defend as never before, and which leads our return to the heavens we fathom here and the unfathomable heaven beyond.
https://t.co/RX7myj54qr
to be fair i looked at his aura, even though there is no such thing, even though it is all such a silly enterprise and i grew a little embarassed in performing the ritual of looking at his aura as if i were serious; and even after all that i am still lying to you, even now lying terribly and cruelly because i am, in honesty, a true believer in aura.
very well there you have it reader! i have always been given to such trifling occultisms!
and even if there is no other aura in all the world; that is to say that only @AGDugin in all of our mother russia has an aura, it is only the aura of Ferdyshchenko opining about railways.
Male human scent (higher in certain chemosignals/pheromones) → detected by birds olfactorily → triggers a stress response in the birds (like in the 2014 mice study) → this stress releases endogenous opioids/endorphins (stress-induced analgesia) → the opiates reduce reaction time (or blunt the speed/urgency of the threat response) → birds have a delayed or reduced flight response, tolerating men ~1 meter closer before fleeing.
https://t.co/X0OOZFOpaR
man is, so to speak, balanced at the tip of the tongue of G-d's desire, that word which hangs unspeakable, lost in a moment of tension, though all of its meaning, and the longing of the convayance of its meaning hangs there just out of reach, the held breath for the last signifier of some communication that must be communicated.
it becomes the entire focus of the intellect, builds to a cresendo of anxious search, the whole shape of it only lacking itself to signify, to signify itself which is in the end of time, after all that man has facillitated to be made known
HaShem spoke and the world...
and adam knew the names to name them...