@MichaelCor78893@TitansOnSI In the first half season you can argue that’s true, sure. But that’s the case for most rookie QBs. Caleb Williams didn’t do the Bears many favors the first half of his rookie season either.
The second half of the season, that is absolutely not the case for Cam.
@_eeezy0@DaWhiteWalker10@Titans_Evan23 Nobody’s questioning that Tyson has elite talent. But if you think Tate isn’t in the same tier you’re crazy.
Not to mention that, between the two, one of them was actually able to stay healthy throughout his career, in harsher conditions and against better competition.
@Financial_Gems@AtoZSports You don’t know what they’re asking him to do. It seems like it’s intentional for him to leave it short because they’re all expecting it within the same five yard area and pull up around there.
@Michael78672912 I've seen your replies in that thread, man. This isn't about attention to detail. This is about you looking for things.
And you can thank the NFL for that license - EA wanted it opened up.
Is EA Sports putting out Battlefield? Battlefield also doesn’t release annually like clockwork. They have open betas because, generally, there’s a much smaller player base by comparison.
Get over yourself buddy. You want EA to hear your feedback? Write a letter. But acting like they want you to pay for a beta is stupid. Usually the beta and the final product are nowhere close. They dont want the fans all playing the beta, they want you to play the final product.
You’ve reset the bar for the most unintelligent asshole I’ve met, and that’s saying something. Enjoy your night.
Lmao. Being mad about it is the clown behavior.
They get a ton of feedback but they have to prioritize what gets addressed and determine if it’s feasible to be addressed without breaking something else.
There’s also the fact the NFL has control and we don’t know to what extent that EA can just do stuff without their sign off and approval.
The point of the beta is to point out bugs, errors. People, currently, use the beta as a way to send EA a wishlist, which isn’t the point of the beta. If you open the beta to the community, that’s what you end up with and it makes it that much more difficult to sort through and fix what is actually broken.
You also open up to differing opinions. “Pass rush is too fast.” “Pass rush isn’t good enough.” Now multiply thousands of that kind of feedback when the devs are looking for specific issues.
That’s not it at all…
It’s not about a respect for the community, it’s about not trying to end up inundated and overwhelmed with the feedback. They already get a ton of it as it is. If you open it to everyone you’re going to get too much feedback and it will take that much more to sift through it.
EA never used to but, if you think about it, it makes sense.
You’re viewing it as purchase to access the beta, but really, access to the beta is just a benefit of the purchase.
It used to be, you had to be invited. With all the leaks there would be of the beta and all the people who crave it, EA’s thought is sure, pay for the membership and you get access as part of it.
In addition to 4 days earlier access than just pre-ordering the MVP bundle.
@triggermatt_@CoreySteadman8@honestlyqu With all the tools to manage it though, it shouldn’t matter if it does or not. That is, of course, assuming the tools added work the way they should.