This is the heart of my saying:
Not all women are whores but they all wish they could be..
it is the only plausible explination to them defening the WORST of female behavior no matter what it was
The word “situationship” was created by women, because they needed a more socially acceptable way to say:
“I’ve been chasing Chad for 18 months and he still won’t call me his girlfriend.”
Makes them feel it’s ok
@SoraUnchained@valarr_dohaeris i cant tell if you’re a boy or a girl, but either way im concerned for you. and overall a quote that is as old as mankind himself applies here which is —
anything thats truly quality and worth obtaining has never come easily and quickly.
1/2
@SoraUnchained@valarr_dohaeris The % of said type women are MUCH smaller today but they are out there for men to hold out for.
Modern Men today are simply too pussy-wiped and emotional to stand on principle and wait for that type of women to cross their path.
2/2
@SoraUnchained@valarr_dohaeris that doesn’t mean there’s no hope. i meant modern Men have to wise up and be even better “vetters” of these type of women early in the talking phase / dating phase.
a % of Men can find these old school type of women we want.
1/2
@SoraUnchained@valarr_dohaeris no shit sherlock, its 2026 not 1826 when most women met one man and then married him.
what you’re saying applies to all men today.
the “FOH” comes from your last sentence that made it sound like a “romanticization of every woman’s journey today having to go down that path” 🤡
If men started judging women the same way women judge men, a lot more women would be single. Men get rejected for their finances, height, status, confidence, ambition and future potential all the time. Imagine if men started rejecting women for every flaw, every bad decision, every phase of their lives and every sign of instability too. The dating market would look very different overnight..
People want “party era freedom” and “storybook partner standards” like they’re ordering from two different menus with no overlap in consequences.
Life doesn’t always work like that. At some point, your history walks into the room with your expectations and sits at the same table.
You don’t get to erase the receipt and still claim the purchase
@valarr_dohaeris She spent her 20s getting used like a rag then wants a gentleman at 28 who pays for everything and never raises his voice. That’s not growth. That’s retirement planning.
She’ll let fuckboys choke her, spit on her, and treat her like a rag in her 20s.
Then at 28 she wants a “respectful gentleman” who opens doors and never raises his voice.
Same mouth that swallowed random loads now lectures you about “emotional maturity”.
The duality is insane.
abusive girlfriends are too normalized amongst men. in fact it’s a majority in relationships with toxic and argumentative gfs because men aren’t taught that it’s not normal
“In whatever you do, marry a kind partner.”
Things women say to remind you that they are very aware they exist on charity; that they do not meet many relational requirements and, hence, that relationships with them is an act of charity towards them.
So they want a kind partner because only in kindness, benevolence, and leniency are relationships with women ever possible.
“Marry a kind partner.”
Hidden inside that statement is an unconscious admission: relationships with women survive more on male tolerance than female merit.
Women understand - perhaps more than men do - that relationships with them require patience, leniency, emotional accommodation, forgiveness, restraint, and continuous interpretation of emotion.
That is why “kindness” becomes the supreme male virtue in female language.
Because without male benevolence, many relationships would collapse under the weight of female excess, emotional inconsistency, impulsiveness, and relational contradiction.
A logical man notices too much. A strict man demands proportion.
But a kind man absorbs dysfunctions women carry. And women know this.
So when many women say, “Marry a kind partner,” what they are often indirectly saying is:
“Find a man generous enough to continuously overlook what would ordinarily disqualify me.”