John DeMill

American patriot, defending freedom above all. Small government advocate, fiscally conservative, socially liberal. Passionate about sports, blue-collar worker

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Wow

[John DeMill @DemillJohn]

@CeaseYourHeresy @BasedMikeLee Also. KJV was published in 1611. When did the church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints form ? It would have had to be before that since you claim it was edited to fit the “Mormon” religion.

[John DeMill @DemillJohn]

Per Grok: In short, the KJV is widely respected and used by numerous Protestant, Baptist, Pentecostal, and a few other groups (especially conservative or independent ones), but it is not the sole or official Bible for most of global Christianity. Usage often depends more on local church tradition than denomination-wide rules. For specific churches near you, practices can vary even within the same label.

[John DeMill @DemillJohn]

@CeaseYourHeresy @BasedMikeLee Do share the differences since you are so well informed ? At the same time, ask yourself how many other Christian religions use the King James Version bible ?

[John DeMill @DemillJohn]

@CeaseYourHeresy @BasedMikeLee Ignorant take dude. You realize Mormons believe in the bible fully… all of Jesus teachings. How do you explain that ?

[John DeMill @DemillJohn]

@CeaseYourHeresy @BasedMikeLee Help
Me understand why you think a morman isn’t Christian, when the main teachings of the church are about Christ ?

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

Charlie Kirk in September 2020:

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 JUST IN: VP JD Vance CALLS OUT California's rampant fraud and cheating after Spencer Pratt gets thrust behind Nithya Raman due to "late mail-in ballots"

"You would expect these mail-in ballots to kind of meet that same basic pattern where, number one would get the most votes, number two would get the second most votes and so on."

"But somehow we find ourselves in a situation where number one, they're still receiving ballots, not just counting ballots, they're still receiving ballots!"

"And number two, the way that they're coming in just so happens to work out such that the Republican is getting kicked out of the final two so it's a Democrat versus Democrat runoff!"

"That seems pretty shady to me, especially when you add on top of the fact that in California you are prohibited from asking for somebody's identification before they vote!"

[Kintsugijin @Kintsugijin]

I hate my timeline right now.

Mormons are Christian. Christianity means discipleship of Jesus Christ. If your definition excludes people who worship Christ, covenant with Christ, preach Christ, and try to follow Christ, then your definition is broken.

At that point, you’re not defending Christianity. You’re guarding a social club label.

The question isn’t whether LDS are Christian.

The question is why some people are so desperate to make Christ smaller than their own gatekeeping. 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[Mark R. Levin @marklevinshow]

What Newscum has done to the California voting system is essentially legalize fraud.  

Ballots mailed everywhere.  Ballots can be post marked up to 7-days after the election.  No voter ID.  22-day period for resolving signature issues. High number of provisional ballots.  Voter harvesting (any third party can return another person's ballot, no limit on how many ballots a third party can return).

[AG @AGHamilton29]

Candace Owens was recently named the "Antisemite of the Year" by the @StopAntisemites group. I don't necessarily like the phrasing, but here is why I believe Candace Owens is among the most dangerous antisemites in the country:

There are two underlying presumptions in that claim:

1) Owens is an antisemite, and 2) That she is a particularly dangerous one.

On count 1:

Six Degrees of Jews:

A central tactic by conspiracy-driven antisemites, especially those in the neo-Nazi realm, is a game of "six degrees of Jews."

An example of how this works: Let's say a small town is hit by a crime spree driven by a gang. The gang has six leaders: one is Jewish, three are Catholic, one is Protestant, and one is Muslim.

The antisemite then declares, "Jews are driving crime in this town," and points to the one Jewish gang member as evidence. Now, if you're someone who doesn't know about the gang and just knows crime has gone up drastically, the connection is automatically drawn. You don't know that there are five other leaders or that it has nothing to do with that one gang leader's religion. So, all you have is a rise in crime which you now correlate to someone who is Jewish. This tactic heavily depends on the ignorance of the audience.

However, because antisemites are obsessed with blaming all of the world's ills on Jews and there isn't always a Jewish gang leader since Jews make up a small portion of the population, their next step is just to claim there is a connection, regardless of whether it's true or baseless. Again, they rely on the audience not knowing any better.

This has been the central tactic of neo-Nazis for years. Candace Owens has spent almost the entire year utilizing this tactic to create exactly the narrative described above. So, for example, she establishes that Stalin was bad (though, for neo-Nazis, he wasn't bad because he massacred millions of people, including many Jews, but because he helped defeat the Nazis). Then she claims Stalin had a Jewish name (he didn't), had three Jewish wives (he had two wives, neither of which were Jewish), and spoke Yiddish (he didn't). Similarly, she says Lenin was Jewish, but Lenin's quarter-Jewish heritage was only discovered after his death. But her entire point in drawing these connections is to blame Jews for Soviet Communism, relying on a game of six degrees of Jews. Again, she's counting on her audience not knowing any better.

She hasn't done this once but repeatedly for almost a year. So she connects modern Jews to Frankism (an obscure cult with max of 50K followers) without telling people they were explicitly rejected by Jewish leaders (and that they explicitly rejected Jewish beliefs), and then most Frankists converted to Christianity. She then tried to connect them to the Leo Frank case in the US, which she also completely misrepresented, despite no real ties other than sharing the name "Frank."

Owens did the same thing with an old antisemitic conspiracy about Jews creating and funding the popular Scofield Bible to ruin Christianity. Only that's just not true. It is based on Six Degrees of Jews where Owens points out Scofield was in the Lotus Club with someone who is Jewish (she suggests this was a Jewish connection), and then was in the same country where the Zionist Congress met. Of course, Owens and her fellow antisemites expect their audience not to check if the Lotus Club connection was the primary funder for the Bible (he wasn't—the top funder was Alwyn Ball Jr., a Christian real estate developer) or whether he was in the city the same year as the Zionist Congress (he wasn't). But you see how this game works; it's just about pointing the finger and trying to establish the connection.

Again, this tactic of constantly trying to find Jews to blame for the world's bad events with selective or false information is exclusively played by antisemites. No regular person would do it, especially not repeatedly every day.

You will notice that none of this relates to Israel, though Owens certainly extended her conspiracies to Israel, but I want to emphasize other examples to make the point that her target isn't Israel or Israel's government, but Jews. There are many other examples of conspiracies from Owens over this year, almost all using the tactic mentioned.

On Count 2:

The reason Owens is particularly dangerous is because she gained an audience of millions prior to going down this route and is smarter than your average antisemite. As I mentioned before, the tactic of tying Jews to every bad thing that happens occurs via six degrees of Jews but is very reliant on having an audience that trusts you and doesn't know that's what you are doing. Owens, unlike the typical antisemite who promotes these conspiracies, already had access to that audience. She developed it over years via relatively mainstream platforms on the right, pushing what are otherwise mainstream attacks on the left. She has access to millions who believe her and have no way of knowing that she is feeding them insane and bigoted conspiracies. They just know crime has gone up, and someone they have listened to identified a Jewish leader in the gang.

In addition, Owens isn't as dumb as the typical neo-Nazis who promote these conspiracies. Someone like Jake Shields might attempt this game, but he eventually lacks the intellectual rigor to maintain them and resorts to just praising Hitler or attacking Jews openly. Owens is smart enough not to explicitly state she supports Hitler but instead minimizes the Holocaust and argues the Allies were just as bad. That allows her to maintain a degree of plausible deniability. Those denials are meaningless once you see what she is doing, but it adds to what makes her so dangerous and allows her message to be more mainstream.

This is also what makes someone like @piersmorgan extremely poorly suited to confront her. He neither knows what she has said nor how it is wrong, so he ends up making general statements about antisemitism being bad, and she just denies that's what she is doing and engages in a massacre of strawman arguments.

Anyways, people are certainly free to ignore these facts and associate with her. But that doesn’t change that they exist and those who actually oppose antisemitism need to be vocal about it so her audience at least is told they are being played and has the sense to check for the truth.

[John DeMill @DemillJohn]

@cryptofergani Me

[John DeMill @DemillJohn]

@defense_civil25 Source for Netanyahu confirming Iran has nuclear weapons ?? I sure can’t find any source saying that

[Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson]

They want you to believe this happened in the LA Mayors race…

3rd place jumps to 1st in *every* ballot drop *after* Election Day

Defies all mathematical probability, the law of averages and has never happened in US election history

No one with a functional brain believes this

[John DeMill @DemillJohn]

@SarahEMcBride Which adversary doesn’t fear him or the US? What a naive unintelligent take

[F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli @USAttyEssayli]

California Is Blocking a Federal Audit of Its Voter Rolls

California allows first-time voters to register using forms of ID that most Americans would find surprising, including:

-Gym membership card
-Employer ID card
-Credit or debit card
-Prescription drug label
-Insurance card (California provides free health coverage to undocumented immigrants)

Full list: https://t.co/BvfviJsYG8

This is permitted when a voter fails to provide a Social Security number or driver’s license at registration. Our office believes this policy deserves a closer look.

We also have serious concerns about how California maintains its voter rolls. There are open questions about whether the state is promptly removing deceased voters, people who have moved, and individuals convicted of disqualifying felonies.

On top of that, California allows third parties to collect and turn in ballots on voters’ behalf (a practice known as ballot harvesting) with few restrictions. This makes it difficult to track who actually received, completed, and submitted each ballot.

For over a year, the Department of Justice has been trying to audit California’s voter rolls. Federal law gives the Attorney General the authority to review state voter files and confirm that only eligible U.S. citizens are voting in federal elections.

@AAGDhillon sent California a letter explaining our legal authority. California refused to comply, claiming state privacy laws block the review, an argument that does not hold up because those laws don’t apply to the federal government in this context. We’ve sued California in federal court, and the case is before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

If California genuinely wants voters to trust its elections, it should open its records, not fight to keep them closed.

What are they afraid of?

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Mr. Hunter Biden,

You're getting six-digit likes on every post lately. I don't have any hope to ratio you or whatever through traditional "Hello" means.

But for those uninitiated, those who are captivated by your fake-humble persona obviously PR-engineered to capture unsuspecting disaffected Republicans:

You are not some humility, witty guy turning over a new leaf. You are the ultimate proof of nepotism, everything that the so-called "Epstein Class" is supposed to represent.

Let me explain - off the top of my head.

You were a board member of USGLC. U.S. Global Leadership Coalition. The most powerful NGO that nobody's ever heard of. Last year, I documented in several threads, how Liz Schrayer, USGLC lead, took credit for ramming through a 90 billion dollar bill for Ukraine in 2024, even as @mattvanswol demonstrated that Western North Carolina got zero help in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene because FEMA threw up their hands and said they ran out of funds.

USGLC, arguably, is the most powerful NGO that nobody has ever heard of. It includes a bunch of corporations, a bunch of nonprofit leads, and ... for some magical reason, I documented, extensively, linked, that Liz Schrayer started pursuing you in 2012. During the Obama years, when you were Biden's son. Are you a former Secretary of State? No. Are you a CEO of a Fortune 500 company? No. That puts you below the average USGLC board member, by a good tier.

So what DID get you on USGLC? The only reason: that you were the son of a sitting Vice President known for corruption, and you yourself were known for corruption.

You are not "folksy." You are the worst of the worst of the elite. Most of the elite, at least, get their credentials through Georgetown/George Washington/Harvard Kennedy. You got yours purely on nepotism. Any photographs you have of yourself at motels is proof that you are so incompetent that you waste all your money, not that you come from humble beginnings. Because others like @MarcoPolo501c3 have thoroughly documented that you benefited a great deal from your nepotism.

You even tried to bait those in with saying you prefer to keep immigration "legal" - but we all know the trap that keeps illegal immgrants here: outlaw deportations, and make every immigrant case "asylum", and magically, everyone who might've been here illegally a few years ago is legal.

You may get 175K likes on your semi-subverting, PR-designed photographs. But those of us who know, know you're fake.

https://t.co/vMml22uCbu

[Aaron Torres @Aaron_Torres]

I try not to get political. But LA is where I live, and I am here to tell you: There is 0.0 percent chance these results are legit.

Nithya Raman has no base. No one knew who she was until Spencer Pratt torched her on debate stage. She gave a concession speech on Tuesday.

I really hope the federal government and @USAttyEssayli are investigating

(Again, apologize for getting political. Feel free to unfollow if this bothers you.

But a light needs to be shined on what's happening)

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

Election night batches in Los Angeles:
🔵 Karen Bass: 38%
🔴 Spencer Pratt: 28%
🔵 Nithya Raman: 20%

New batch (5 days after the election):
🔵 Nithya Raman: 40%
🔵 Karen Bass: 33%
🔴 Spencer Pratt: 18%

Keep in mind only the top 2 advance to the next round, which is why the third place candidate suddenly surged

Not even hiding it

[Chef Andrew Gruel @ChefGruel]

It’s no coincidence that on May 27th Newsom signed SB 73 which restricts access by federal law enforcement to certain election materials