@space_audits I am here....waiting...and you and Shane won't disprove my outdoor data. Reality contradicts your claims....so don't say no glober is challenging it because I am right here.
@did8hurtu Wow - the information is right there that demonstrates the globe and you can't even see it. You just make assertions and can't even demonstrate your claim.
@did8hurtu@TheSilverWave Let's simplify it for you. We want a working model...not an imaginary light show projection that doesn't match what we see and measure outside. Side Note: Joe Hanvey is a coward and blocks people that disprove him.
@did8hurtu@Xentrik85 It takes one day outside to disprove flat earth. Don't worry - this isn't a FE account on X but I do have one @helpingFEers that I barely use. What I found out is X flat earthers are just as willfully ignorant at Tiktok flat earthers. Again - sundials only work on a globe.
@did8hurtu@Xentrik85 You can sit back down with your lack of credibility. I spent two years showing how the globe matches reality and the flat earth never does.
https://t.co/aoTgBNds9A
@did8hurtu Oh look at the willfully ignorant. Equatorial sundials don't lay flat, vertical sundials don't lay flat, armillary dials don't lay flat. So keep making assertions with no evidence while I keep demonstrating you wrong.
@Xentrik85@did8hurtu I would love to see people that say the sky can't prove the shape of the earth and stick them in a room with people like Alan and Shane. The Great Flat Earth Divide
@AntiDisinfo86@space_audits@PiezoAetheric I can match observed measured reality very easily on a globe. You can't. So go outside and point to the true position of the sun in the sky and then try and make up why it's there.
@gatheredwaters@space_audits@AntiDisinfo86@PiezoAetheric@helpingFEers #1 It doesn't match observed measured reality
#2 There is no verifiable way to prove the "true position" of anything
#3 Sundials don't work
#4 Triangulatation doesn't work
#5 Navigation doesn't work
#6 Compass headings don't work
All these work on a globe. You can sit down
@space_audits@AntiDisinfo86@PiezoAetheric You mean the globe you have seem to have removed from your model....that one? Let's test both models and see which one matches reality from multiple locations at once. @helpingFEers
@AntiDisinfo86@space_audits@PiezoAetheric Weird how this was there at some point....and double weird that you can't replicate all measurements from all positions. It's so easy to dismantle your model.
@space_audits@AntiDisinfo86@PiezoAetheric How about you ask me what my argument is and not assert what my argument is Alan. So let's be very clear. All measurements to the celestial bodies, from all positions, at all times (let's say 99%) match a globe model. This is impossible on flat earth...so are sundials.