This ridiculous statistic keeps appearing: medical errors are the third leading cause of death.
It is a powerful narrative that has spawned a massive quality-control bureaucracy.
It is also completely wrong.
Taking care of sick patients is not like flying an airplane. Pilots fly machines that have been maintained and cleared for takeoff. Doctors often take over when the plane is already on fire and heading toward a mountain.
Also, not every airplane is destined to crash. Yet, every patient is destined to die eventually.
When reviewers judge bad outcomes backward, they routinely classify the brutal, inevitable tradeoffs of medicine as preventable errors. Critically ill patients have more interventions and higher mortality. That does not mean an adverse event killed them, or that a new bureaucratic rule would have saved them.
The two papers often cited, one by the Institute of Medicine, another by Marty Makary, have substantial flaws. They often struggled to determine whether an adverse event actually caused the death. Shojania and Dixon-Woods, writing in BMJ Quality & Safety, criticized the “third leading cause” claim for exactly this reason. They argued that the estimate combined prior studies too simplistically, failed to follow accepted standards for quantitative synthesis, and did not adequately address whether the adverse events detected by review tools actually contributed to death.
In my latest essay, I explore how the exaggeration of preventable error has actively harmed patient care. The safety movement did not stop at identifying clear, recurring failures. It became a governing philosophy that gave administrators a moral language to control the clinical encounter.
Today, physicians spend hundreds of hours a year feeding quality metrics, hospitals game the data to manage their mortality statistics, and independent practices are crushed under the fixed costs of compliance.
When the metric becomes the target, institutions optimize for the metric. In some cases, like the push to reduce hospital readmissions, that optimization has actually caused more patients to die.
The honest path to patient safety begins by admitting that medical care involves dangerous tradeoffs, not deterministic guarantees. Read the full essay in the reply below.
@redpillb0t I know very few docs that actually want to see their patients on a regular bases….. and those regular bases are annual wellness visits…..
Very ignorant post to rage bait. This is a very intellectually lazy b
Relaxed FDA rules unleash flood of unvetted blood pressure devices
Tech companies including Oura, Samsung seize opportunity, while experts raise concerns
@mariojoze has the story. https://t.co/Vt2TvSco9g
Stop a statin and your LDL cholesterol rises 30% in four days. Nobody writes a WSJ feature about it. Stop certain blood pressure medications and your BP can spike within hours. Nobody calls it a design flaw.
Levothyroxine, antidepressants, insulin, metformin, antihistamines. Chronic treatments for chronic conditions, and all of them stop working when you stop taking them. None of them generate think-pieces questioning whether patients should have started.
The AMA classified obesity as a disease in 2013. Thirteen years later, it’s still the only chronic condition where “you have to take it forever” is framed as an argument against treatment rather than a description of how medicine works.
Tesla FSD V14.3.3 just started rolling out, and it comes with the Spring Update!
Actually Smart Summon’s top speed has also been increased to 8 mph (from 6 mph)!
Downloading it on my Model Y right now. Software version 2026.14.6.6.