It already happened to David Amess and they were either acting like he didn't matter whatsoever, or they shamelessly exploited his murder to pivot towards an internet censorship agenda that had nothing to do with his preventable death and became every bit a cynical and grotesque power grab that was beneath the dignity/stature of the frauds proposing it.
They will shamelessly throw their own under the bus & circle the wagons if they believe doing so will protect the mass migration agenda. That's clear.
@officialsammyuk Always tone policing tactics from the same enemy collaborators and quislings.
They don't value your life but expect you to assign astronomical value to these random criminals they just shoehorned in from Africa and South Asia, etc by the millions.
No thanks.
Politicians are calling for calm and referring to an immigrant trying to chop a manโs head off as a stabbing.
How about you get fucked with your calls for calm? Our people are being raped, butchered, murdered, and beheaded in the streets while you conduct your experiments with immigration and the replacement of our people.
We have every right to be angry.
This is simply not true @Keir_Starmer.
You absolutely DO tolerate abhorrent scenes of violence like this attack. Just like you tolerate all the rapes and sexual assaults of women and girls by illegal migrants.
You - and most of the political class - decided long ago that these crimes are a price worth paying in return for achieving your multicultural, diverse, open bordered nirvana.
So don't pretend to be shocked and don't wring your hands in sadness. This is the predictable (and predicted) result of the policies YOU support.
Dems are desperate for another George Floyd, Anthony's the closest thing they got this election year. From their standpoint, they should already be having their "Summer of Love."
Some Dem-adjacent activists will try to agitate for an uprising no matter what IMO, but it will be more the Cornel West/Briahna Joy Gray/New Black Panther types calling for it rather than more mainstream voices, I feel.
Whether or not there is mass rioting in response to a Karmelo guilty verdict depends entirely on whether or not the Democrat Party (who would have to fund and organize it, like they always do) thinks that Karmelo is a sympathetic and useful martyr for them. I donโt think he is. Even by the very low standards established for this kind of thing.
@sophielouisecc Should have been like that the entire time, but of course the same way they will never offer up their own accommodations for migrants, they're not going to want the legal liability/accountability either.
If 40 out of 53 Muslim countries are autocratic/theocratic/human rights-abusing slums (and you collectively seem to prefer it that way), who's to say your diaspora communities won't begin agitating for a similar future all across the West once you become numerous/strong enough?
In fact, certain Muslim politicians in Britain have already started calling for blasphemy laws, first cousin marriage, gender segregation, etc. That's a pretty disturbing trajectory for Britain.
One that wouldn't be occurring at all had Muslims been kept out completely.
They may seem like "peaceful" people on the surface, yet remain pretty dangerous and subversive all the same. Why would this not be threatening, nevermind the random & routine acts of terror and violence?
I'm sure you can find plenty of examples of ostensibly "peaceful people" living in those aforementioned 40 countries, I'm not denying that...but as a whole, they (as a people) effortlessly & naturally acquiesce/consent to barbaric, unbearable ways of life that Westerners don't want to experience up close. You'll always be a liability because of that.
75% chance Muslim communities will embrace a future dystopian government if allowed to fester on Western soil. Almost guaranteed.
You personally might not be a threat on your own but an ever-burgeoning "Muslim community" will always be threatening, because there's nothing preventing it from metastasizing & becoming a hostile fifth column/ theocratic microcosm of the Muslim world itself from within, and nobody wants that other than Muslims, who shouldn't even be in a position to get a say.
If 40 out of 53 Muslim countries are autocratic/theocratic/human rights-abusing slums (and you collectively seem to prefer it that way), who's to say your diaspora communities won't begin agitating for a similar future all across the West once you become numerous/strong enough?
In fact, certain Muslim politicians in Britain have already started calling for blasphemy laws, first cousin marriage, gender segregation, etc. That's a pretty disturbing trajectory for Britain.
One that wouldn't be occurring at all had Muslims been kept out completely.
They may seem like "peaceful" people on the surface, yet remain pretty dangerous and subversive all the same. Why would this not be threatening, nevermind the random & routine acts of terror and violence?
I'm sure you can find plenty of examples of ostensibly "peaceful people" living in those aforementioned 40 countries, I'm not denying that...but as a whole, they (as a people) effortlessly & naturally acquiesce/consent to barbaric, unbearable ways of life that Westerners don't want to experience up close. You'll always be a liability because of that.
75% chance Muslim communities will embrace a future dystopian government if allowed to fester on Western soil. Almost guaranteed.
You personally might not be a threat on your own but an ever-burgeoning "Muslim community" will always be threatening, because there's nothing preventing it from metastasizing & becoming a hostile fifth column/ theocratic microcosm of the Muslim world itself from within, and nobody wants that other than Muslims, who shouldn't even be in a position to get a say.
Why do non-Muslims see me as a THREAT just because Iโm Muslim?!
I just want to live in PEACE. Why am I judged for what a few criminals do?!
This isnโt fear, this is pure hate. ๐๐