Olivia
Online
Erika Caliente
@ErikaCaliente
Master Salsa Instructor, Crunchy Mama
Florida, USA
Joined January 2018
637 Following
181 Followers
601 Posts
🚨BREAKING: Our Peer-Reviewed Reanalysis of the Henry Ford Study Finds Vaccinated Children Sicker Across ALL 22 Chronic Disease Categories
Reanalysis of the LARGEST U.S. vaccinated vs. unvaccinated birth cohort study ever conducted reveals 54% higher CANCER rates and 549% higher AUTISM-related disorders among vaccinated children.
Our independent proportional-incidence reanalysis and peer-review of the Henry Ford birth cohort study (Lamerato et al.) — revealed at the U.S. Senate Hearing on September 9, 2025 — examined 18,468 children (16,511 vaccinated with a median of 18 doses and 1,957 completely unvaccinated) and found the following ⬇️
⚠️All 22 chronic disease categories were more common in vaccinated children.
🧩Conditions which collectively form the clinical profile associated with autism spectrum disorder — including autism itself, ADHD, developmental delay, speech disorder, learning disability, neurological impairment, and related diagnoses — occurred at 5.49-fold (549%) higher odds in vaccinated children.
🎗️Childhood cancer occurred 54% more often in vaccinated children.
📈By age 10, 57% of vaccinated children had developed at least one chronic disease, compared to only 17% of unvaccinated children.
We used proportional-incidence analysis because many conditions had zero or near-zero cases in the unvaccinated group — a well-known “zero-cell” problem that makes odds-ratio modeling mathematically incapable of detecting true differences. This method reveals the large disparities the original authors’ statistics hid.
Proportional increases we calculated for all 22 chronic conditions:
1. Any chronic condition: 3.50x higher (+250%)
2. Asthma: 6.53x higher (+553%)
3. Atopic disease: 4.86x higher (+386%)
4. Autoimmune disease: 12.2x higher (+1120%)
5. Brain dysfunction: Present only in vaccinated
6. Cancer: 1.54x higher (+54%)
7. Diabetes: Present only in vaccinated
8. Food allergy: 2.28x higher (+128%)
9. Mental health disorder: 7.96x higher (+696%)
10. Neurodevelopmental disorder (umbrella): 13.54x higher (+1254%)
11. ADHD: Present only in vaccinated
12. Autism: 2.8x higher (+180%)
13. Behavioral disability: Present only in vaccinated
14. Developmental delay: 5.12x higher (+412%)
15. Learning disability: Present only in vaccinated
16. Intellectual disability: Present only in vaccinated
17. Speech disorder: 9.03x higher (+803%)
19. Motor disability: 9.1x higher (+810%)
19. Tics: Present only in vaccinated
20. Other psychological disability: Present only in vaccinated
21. Neurological disorder: 1.26x higher (+26%)
22. Seizure disorder: 3.16x higher (+216%)
We calculated that the current CDC childhood immunization schedule now contains at least 81 doses of vaccines by age 18 — more than four times higher than the median exposure in the Henry Ford cohort. This means that the dramatic disparities we uncovered in this dataset emerge even at a fraction of the full CDC schedule.
This is one of the clearest population-level datasets EVER produced demonstrating that the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule is a MAJOR driver of chronic disease, neurodevelopmental injury, and early-life morbidity.
Transcript of my public comment at the ACIP meeting today:
Good afternoon. My name is Toby Rogers. I have a Ph.D. in Political Economy from the University of Sydney and a Master of Public Policy degree from UC Berkeley. I’m currently a Fellow at the Brownstone Institute where I write about corruption in the pharmaceutical industry.
Using documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act, the Informed Consent Action Network demonstrated that the two most widely used hepatitis B vaccines in the country — Recombivax and Engerix — never should have been licensed by the FDA in the first place.
The clinical trials for Recombivax and Engerix:
• did not include a saline placebo control group;
• were too small to detect uncommon adverse events; and
• were too short to detect the majority of harms.
On that basis alone, Gold Standard Science requires that they be removed from the market.
The autism rate in this country has skyrocketed since the introduction of hepatitis B vaccines — from 1 in 5,000 children diagnosed with autism in the 1980s prior to the introduction of hepatitis B vaccines, to 1 in 31 children on the autism spectrum today.
A study by Thomas Verstraeten at the CDC’s Epidemic Intelligence Service in 1999 showed that the birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine increased the relative risk of autism by more than eleven-fold. Soon thereafter Dr. Verstraeten went to work for GSK in Belgium and the CDC has been covering up his initial research findings ever since.
Vaccinated vs. unvaccinated studies by Gallagher and Goodman, published in 2008 and 2010, also show that hepatitis B vaccines significantly increase autism risk.
Hepatitis B vaccines have killed an astonishing number of children in the U.S. over the last 35 years.
The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System contains 643 reports of death of children and 52,281 total reports of harm, in the U.S., across all ages, in connection with Recombivax and Engerix shots.
Hepatitis B is also a component in many combination vaccines including Pediarix and Vaxelis. The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System contains 1,348 reports of death of children and 82,980 total reports of harm in the U.S., across all ages, following combination hepatitis B vaccines.
Remember that VAERS reports are a significant undercount of harms.
Respectfully, the proposed ACIP voting questions do not go far enough to address documented safety problems. Moving the birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine to 2 months would only produce a small reduction in autism and SIDS rates. Combination shots are NOT safer. Moving the recommendation to age 12 would be better, but would increase autoimmune disorders and POTS cases in teenagers because of the high aluminum content in these shots. The fact remains that there are NO data proving the safety and efficacy of hepatitis B vaccines on day one, 2 months, or 12 years of age. Given that, I believe that hepatitis B vaccines should be removed altogether from the CDC childhood schedule.
Senator Cassidy, your tweet is deeply ironic given that I cannot virtually ever sue vaccine companies for vaccine deaths and harms because of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. Childhood vaccines are the only product in America where you cannot ever sue the company that killed or injured your child on the basis the company could've made the product safer. If vaccines are so safe, why do they need this protection?
While I don’t “make a living” suing vaccine companies, representatives of vaccine companies regularly speak before ACIP to increase sales of their vaccine products. Yet, I have never heard you take issue with those presenters. Under your logic, in deciding upon a new car, one should only listen to car companies and salesmen, but not consumer advocates, like Ralph Nader, who sought to make them safer.
Since you want to engage with me publicly, let's make it substantive. Bring your evidence and let's have a long form public debate where we each get 10 minutes to go back and forth on each major vaccine topic. Will you agree to that? @SenBillCassidy
Happy Monday!
If you think Doctors, Hospitals, and Healthcare leaders are SMART, remember that in the 1970s, patients were routinely given cigarettes in the hospital. Physicians walked by oblivious.
This morning on December 11th 2023 in THOUSANDS of hospitals around the country, sick and inflamed patients will be given a breakfast tray full of pancakes, muffins, sugary cereal, and fake juices. Doctors still walk by oblivious.
Have a great week everyone!
@littleapostate @Nikedyer AFAIK, there’s no such thing as a tetanus-only shot. It’s usually a tDap (tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis), but it’s possible to get a tD shot (no pertussis component).
1/12 This letter still haunts me. Please read it and make a difference by re-posting it. It was written by a friend of mine in Germany who experienced Statin induced ALS/MND. /2
When you take out or eat in at a restaurant, the following is almost ALWAYS true (with maybe only a few exceptions):
1. They have bought the cheapest vegetables (think pesticides, glyphosate)
2. Those eggs and that meat are from factory-farmed animals— treated horribly, fed terrible unnatural food, and pumped with hormones
3. You will almost certainly be getting a high dose of pro-inflammatory refined seed oils
4. However much they say it’s Olive Oil, it’s not pure Extra Virgin Olive you’re eating
Eating and drinking out is almost always unhealthy, so only do it OCCASIONALLY for your meals.
Nothing beats your own kitchen, cooking with high quality foods. You are your own best Chef, and your Inner Chef is your best Doctor
It's so much worse than this. The pro-choice agenda has nothing to do with bodily autonomy or a woman's right to choose, but instead has everything to do with maintaining the supply for the high demand from corporations for fetal tissue for anti-aging products like this, along with vaccines and other biomedical products and research.
If everyone knew how heart tissue was harvested from a living baby without anesthesia for vaccine research and development, I bet vaccination rates would plummet radically.
There’s a poison that’s silently contaminating our soil, food & water.
It’s destroying our gut microbiomes, hormones & is also linked to chronic diseases like cancer.
It’s called glyphosate.
Here’s what you can do to protect your health.
THREAD
This one memo breaks the illusion that these pharmaceutical companies care about the health of your new born infant. Here's the infamous DTP vaccine memo.
In 1979, just a few years before the 1986 vaccine act was passed, which was heavily lobbied for by Wyeth (bought by Pfizer in 2009), there was a memo leaked on the DTP vaccines causing a significant increase in sudden infant death cases in Tennessee.
Instead of taking honest moral measures to remove the vaccine from market, investigate the extent of the damage, and right the wrong with a settlement or compensation, they did the exact opposite.
They developed entirely new guidelines to shuffle vials from batches across the country so if there was a bad batch that was killing babies, it didn't centralize to one state like it did in Tennessee and would make it harder to pin down the cause to the DTP vaccine. That is a literal criminal conspiracy to hide evidence and cover up the fact that the DTP vaccine was killing infants.
This is why pharma blackmailed Reagan and the government to pass the 1986 vaccine act to give themselves full immunity. There were billions and billions of dollars in lawsuits piling up against all these corporations that was going to bankrupt them because it was indefensible, and instead of fixing their product, making it less toxic, or removing it entirely, they systematically covered it up and got the government to give them immunity.
Pfizer, J&J, Sanofi, Glaxo... All of them need to be sued into oblivion and financially obliterated off the face of the earth.
Cancer Mortality by 10y Age Bracket - absolute proof of inflection at Wk 14 2021 (Wonder)
1. Younger ages hit harder for now (first 4 panels)
2. PFE exists in the final 5 panels (exemplified by green lines). PFE is concealing the increase. When that PFE fades
...there will be NO WAY TO HIDE THIS
Angus Dalgleish: Professor of Oncology at St George's Hospital Medical School, London: "At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection). I was told it was merely a coincidence and to keep quiet about it, but it became impossible to do so. The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since. I saw two more cases of cancer relapse post booster vaccination in my patients just this last week.
Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the US. The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of lymphomas, leukaemias and kidney cancers is being seen after booster injections. Additionally my colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere). All these cancers are occurring (with very few exceptions) in patients who have been forced to have a Covid booster whether they were keen or not, for many so they could travel.
So why are these cancers occurring? T cell suppression was my first likely explanation given that immunotherapy is so effective in these cancers. However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development, a feature made even more concerning by reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes. It is very clear and very frightening that these vaccines have several elements to cause a perfect storm in cancer development in those patients lucky enough to have avoided heart attacks, clots, strokes, autoimmune diseases and other common adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines.
To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence; to continue to do so with the above information is medical negligence which can carry a custodial sentence.
No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now."
When I was a kid, my grandfather told me the story of the Blind Men and the Elephant:
(everyone needs to hear this)
Six blind men are brought to examine an elephant that has come to their village.
The first man touches the trunk and says that the elephant is like a thick snake.
The second man touches the tusk and says that the elephant is like a spear.
The third man touches the ear and says that the elephant is like a fan.
The fourth man touches the leg and says that the elephant is like a tree.
The fifth man touches the side and says the elephant is like a wall.
The sixth man touches the tail and says the elephant is like a rope.
Each of the blind men is convinced that he is right and that everyone else is wrong.
American poet John Godfrey Saxe’s version of the story concludes with a simple, beautiful line:
Each was partly in the right, And all were in the wrong.
So, oft in theologic wars, The disputants, I ween, Rail on in utter ignorance, Of what each other mean, And prate about an Elephant, Not one of them has seen!
The moral of this story is that the information we have about the world represents a tiny fraction of the information available, yet we use it to form a view of how the world works.
The world is always infinitely more complex than our narrow observation windows would allow us to understand.
I'm reminded of David Foster Wallace's famous This Is Water speech in 2005 (emphasis mine):
"The point here is that I think this is one part of what teaching me how to think is really supposed to mean. To be just a little less arrogant. To have just a little critical awareness about myself and my certainties. Because a huge percentage of the stuff that I tend to be automatically certain of is, it turns out, totally wrong and deluded."
You can either choose to (A) cling to the notion that your view is the absolute truth or (B) embrace a degree of humility about your views and open your mind to change.
The goal of Path A is to preserve the notion of our own intelligence. The goal of Path B is to broaden and improve our view of reality by acquiring new and better information.
We should all choose Path B...
"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” ― Mark Twain
At the end of every quarter, ask yourself what you've changed your mind on recently.
If you can't think of anything, that's a bad thing.
Fighting back against perspective blindness and opening your mind to new ideas is a tried and true path to consistent, compounding growth.
The next time you want to reject an alternative viewpoint without thinking, remember the story of the Blind Men and the Elephant:
The world is much more complex than any of us can possibly understand.
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
This clip from Denis Rancourt (@denisrancourt) is a MUST WATCH.
He looks into all-cause mortality before the rollout of the vaccine and after the rollout of the vaccine.
Three important points:
1. Before the vax was rolled out, all cause mortality did not cross borders!
"....They declare a pandemic on the 11th of March, 2020, and you get an immediate surge in that all-cause mortality in certain hotspots. So only occurring in New York, northern Italy, Madrid, Stockholm, a few places like that, very intense, very sharp surges of all-cause mortality right after they announced the pandemic. So the fact that it is coordinated, the fact that the timing of the event is related to a political event, the announcement of a pandemic, and that it is synchronous around the world..."
"...it does not cross borders. If you look at European countries or states in the United States, you can have mortality in one jurisdiction and it stops at the border and it's not in the other. So this mortality at the beginning was related to what was being done in those jurisdictions.
"We co-authored a paper where we showed that when you compare U.S. states, if you take states that share a border and one locked down and the other didn't, the all-cause mortality in the locked-down state, even though they're very similar and they're sharing a border, is always higher, significantly higher than in the non-locked-down state. So we're able to, we have a lot of reason to come to the very firm conclusion that what I believe now is that all of the excess all-cause mortality that occurred before the vaccines were rolled out, between when they announced to that time, is all due to lack of treatment and aggressive medical protocols in big hospitals and aggressive government measures that isolated people and stressed them out,"
2. After rolling out the vaccines, all-cause mortality shot up everywhere.
"And so this mortality is very heterogeneous until you start roll out the vaccines. Then once you start rolling out the vaccines, because that was done pretty much simultaneously around the world, you have everywhere an increase in all cause mortality. You move into a regime of higher all cause mortality, and then you stay there while you're rolling out the vaccines. And then every time you roll out a booster, you get a peak, an extra peak in all cause mortality associated in time with that booster"
3. And the bombshell....for every 800 injections, one person will die!
"..we've now looked at over a hundred countries, the mortality risk per injection is pretty much the same everywhere. So all ages, it's about 0.1%. So one, actually we refined it recently as 0.126% with an error bar on it. And so that means that for every 800 injections, one person will die. "
Professor of Oncology at St George's Hospital Medical School, London: "At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection). I was told it was merely a coincidence and to keep quiet about it, but it became impossible to do so. The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since. I saw two more cases of cancer relapse post booster vaccination in my patients just this last week.
Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the US. The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of lymphomas, leukaemias and kidney cancers is being seen after booster injections. Additionally my colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere). All these cancers are occurring (with very few exceptions) in patients who have been forced to have a Covid booster whether they were keen or not, for many so they could travel.
So why are these cancers occurring? T cell suppression was my first likely explanation given that immunotherapy is so effective in these cancers. However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development, a feature made even more concerning by reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes. It is very clear and very frightening that these vaccines have several elements to cause a perfect storm in cancer development in those patients lucky enough to have avoided heart attacks, clots, strokes, autoimmune diseases and other common adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines.
To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence; to continue to do so with the above information is medical negligence which can carry a custodial sentence.
No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now." Angus Dalgleish
With the CDC voting yes on another round of booster shots for kids as young as 6 months old, it's important to be reminded that they aren't recommending the vaccine to protect the health of the child, but to protect pharmaceutical companies from legal liability.
It's hard to believe that this is the case legally, but the immunity from liability only comes when children are recommended the vaccine.
So they are quite literally willing to sacrifice your own child to protect themselves and their money, knowing full well that many children can be harmed or killed from their shots.
This is yet another example of egregiously evil negligence that borders on malice that all the pro-vaccine ideologues will just outright ignore as the underlying motivation for it's approval.
Everyone at the CDC that voted yes need to be criminally investigated and held liable.
Those who disobeyed in Lahaina survived.
The man who disobeyed in Uvalde stopped the shooting.
Those who disobeyed the lockdowns and mandates helped grind them to a halt.
Those who disobey the NM carry ban will protect themselves and their loved ones.
Those who disobey today's orders, will make tomorrow's orders much more difficult for the political class to carry out.
If you're still uncomfortable with disobedience, start getting comfortable.
Ultimately, government is whatever the people in power can get away with and whatever the people they govern will tolerate.
This holds true for all governments whether they be republics, democracies, dictatorships, monarchies, socialist, or communist.
Noncompliance is key.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.1M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.1M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.3M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.6M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
86.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.7M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.3M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.4M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.7M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.4M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.3M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60M followers