Larper, TTRPG, Dungeon Master, mediocre artist and gamer.
Amateur Youtuber who makes vids about those things.
Also a writer under the pseudonym W.O. Teary.
Note: if the developers already have the non-ai voice work done/recorded but just not implemented yet, please ignore. Otherwise I have a video to share:
https://t.co/ICe0onHS50
@keepsake
@Christ3Is7King@HQNewsNow I'm going to try to respond with kindness (in which case I apologize for my original snark). Dnd as a hobby actually helped me get over my shyness and inability to talk in public. It's a fun hobby that can be great as a creative outlet and being social with friends.
@heidi_pepp90717@CharldonPedro@danieltkelley "This world hunger program isn't working since hunger still exists."
"This sick veteran program isn't working since sick vets still exists."
"This animal shelter program isn't working since animal abuse still exists."
This is what you sound like.
@kaniff_kenith@WaynePAYR@UBERSOY1 Blind people, dementia patients, kids, dyslexics, drunks, those operating at 3 hours sleep through no fault of their own, this is a group of people who might want to choose red but have a chance at pressing blue by accident.
Thinking it through isn't an option for them.
@ProficFicus Those with suicidal tendencies that we as a society would still try to save (talking someone off a bridge), those who are super paranoid and while they would understand the context of the question/premise might distrust it (vaccine deniers) and those that are blind/color blind.
@johnpalmer To be fair kids aren't rational and you can be perfectly rational but blind/color blind as well. In that regard it's perfectly rational to put yourself at risk at the chance at saving someone else to the benifit of the whole, something fire fighters do all the time for example.
@camhigby Issue is, there are people who press blue without realizing what they're doing. Kids, anyone with cognitive issues, blind people who might wish to press red but can't see it for example.
Choosing blue would save those people who purposefully didn't choose for themselves.
@dark_road_games@LineGutter Also even if we were to grant your original premise about not letting people who can't physically understand vote, we still have to remember that people who are blind or color blind would vote as well. Unless we also assume that the buttons would have letters or Braille on them.
@dark_road_games@LineGutter I don't know what to tell you, it's how the question is phrased and if we're going by semantics, those who don't vote only die if most people choose red. If most people choose blue then those who don't vote still live.
Once again, that's how it's written.
@fabryei@Kadae This ignores people who either get confused or are unable to choose properly for whatever reason. Kids, dyslexics and color blind people might want a 100% chance to survive but might press blue by accident for example.
@fabryei Red is what you press if you want to guarantee your own survival.
Blue is if you want a better chance to save everyone because it's never going to be 100% red due to kids, dyslexics and color blind people accidently choosing blue. Blue is the only chance where 100% survives.
@cinnamontoastk The 100% red pick assumption assumes that kids, dislexia and color blindess don't exsist. Even if everyone wanted to pick red for what it means, doesn't guarantee that it'd happen.
@junhagemay If it's a reading comprehension test then that means that we have to acknowledge there will be people who press blue even if theyIwould prefer the other option.
Those with dyslexia, kids or those who are color blind for example. The only way for 0 casualties is for majority blue.