@tunguz I recommended something similar. You could probably build an embedding representation of what a user likes and use a simple similarity search with a reranker to build a feed. https://t.co/S9D0Y3LXQy
@elonmusk Having grok read every message, sounds expensive.
Would it be better to train a multimodal embedding model and get embeddings for each post?
Then you could calc a weighted embedding avg per user based on their preferences.
Then use results to predict what post users want...
@elonmusk Having grok read every message, sounds expensive.
Would it be better to train a multimodal embedding model and get embeddings for each post?
Then you could calc a weighted embedding avg per user based on their preferences.
Then use results to predict what post users want...
@gzicherm@amg_jimmy599k@DecotaFrank@TVMADoc@elonmusk And taken to an extreme, the whole economy is affected by an injection of cash, so everyone is hiring more workers, which causes salaries to go up, and that's where you create an inflationary cycle.
It runs the economy too hot. Too much money for the goods and labor available.
@amg_jimmy599k@DecotaFrank@gzicherm@TVMADoc@elonmusk Exactly. I feel like we are saying the same thing. If the govt goes out and gives all 20 buyers $5, and some of the buyers who couldn't afford the apples before, can afford them now, the seller will raise prices until only 10 people are able/willing to buy them. That's inflation.
@amg_jimmy599k@DecotaFrank@gzicherm@TVMADoc@elonmusk The issue is that there are only 10 apples. If there are 20 people that want to buy apples, 10 people will always miss out. The govt can give everyone apple money, but it only creates inflation.
Instead the govt could stimulate 🍏 production & inspire more people to grow apples.
@DecotaFrank@gzicherm@TVMADoc@elonmusk As soon as more money is injected into the economy, more people can afford apples, so they start trying to buy them. But there are still only 10 apples, so the price adjusts upwards until demand and supply are balanced again.
@DecotaFrank@gzicherm@TVMADoc@elonmusk The assumption is that there's pent up demand. If people only want 10 apples and the farmer produces 10 apples and the price is agreed on, then you are good.
But that's never the case. The idea is that the market wants more apples, but at $1 each, only 10 people can afford one.
@EthGigcast@RobertMSterling Yeah, whenever I find someone I like, I immediately communicate up the chain the need to hold onto them. Sometimes you still lose them, but I've held onto them for longer when leadership knows.
@elizawong888@RobertMSterling It's about qty, and these consultancies would struggle to find enough American workers at these pay scales, with these hours and travel schedules, who could actually do the job.
They don't train people at all. It's sink or swim. Either deliver or get fired.
@elizawong888@RobertMSterling It's a generalization for sure. These companies also recruit from American universities. The issue is that when you find those gems, they leave. The turnover with Americans is huge. You either send them packing for doing bad work or they change companies bc they do good work.
@RobertMSterling As I said before, I believe if these jobs didn't come from abroad, I don't think they'd be replaced by Americans. They'd mostly just disappear. (Though, maybe it would spark investment in AI, which would be good for me.)
@RobertMSterling 7. Ultimately, I'm not sure I agree with the push for reform. (To get the level of reform mentioned above, all you'd really need to do is switch from lottery and take the top paying requests for each category/title.)