@Usero0001a@GBPolitcs Got it. So you want them to:
- pay the farmers more
- pay the employees more
- employ more people on longer hour contacts
- pay more tax (with what profits?)
Anything else?
Im sure you’d also be upset it they raised prices?
At this point why not have the gov run it all.
@Usero0001a@GBPolitcs You called me thick, I was just correcting you buddy. You get your education from Damien on youtube, I got mine at world respected universities.
You’re just a sad wagie who’s never had an original thought.
The 4 big supermarkets don’t use zero hour contacts… or pay min wage.
@Usero0001a@GBPolitcs Im not trolling either, I promise im smarter than you, it’s not even close. I have a top 5 economics degree and a masters.
Im just trying to get you to exercise some critical thinking skills which you obviously can’t do.
@Usero0001a@GBPolitcs They’re just two examples of cheap things that came to mind. I could give you more.
mobile phone SIM cards?
budget airline flights?
All very cheap compared to other places.
@Usero0001a@GBPolitcs I watched it. What does this have to do with farmers and supermarkets? Or anything to do with our conversation at all? We’re talking about cheap prices and your view that it means that someone’s being exploited. Not how companies access tax loopholes and shift profits offshore.
@Usero0001a@GBPolitcs Can you actually read? You’ve just spouted off a load of left wing tropes about taxing the rich and not answered my question.
1. Who is being exploited in the water supply chain.
2. Who is being exploited in the healthcare system.
Both are cheap/free, just tell me.
@feacrone@GBPolitcs For the record, I acknowledge that supermarkets have power over the farmers, it’s always going to be a case in such a market structure like you say. I don’t however think the solution is to take the value away from the consumer by preventing supermarkets from competing in price.
@feacrone@GBPolitcs If you read it properly I was not complaining about Farmers having little wealth. I was complaining that IHT on farms will lead to bad outcomes. Most farmers ON PAPER are very wealthy but if you tax their land inheritance, mathematically they will be forced to sell.
@Usero0001a@GBPolitcs Okay, I sat down and had a think:
Im just presenting your own argument back to you and asking you to apply your own “logic” to an alternative situation.
You can’t do it, because it’s not logic, it’s just an assumption. A bad one at that.
@Usero0001a@GBPolitcs Things being cheap has nothing to do with people being exploited in this case.
For example, water, super cheap, who’s being exploited?
Or inversely, the NHS, the NHS is free. If cheap things = exploitation, who is it thats being exploited?
@OleMissRebel90@OfficialC98 We have stadiums older than your country. There’s levels to it. Our teams and rivalries have been around for centuries and have real backstory outside the sport.
@MrJamesMay Almost:
If he ate it - transgender
If he gave to someone else - homosexual
If he gave it back to you - bisexual
If he kept it and done nothing with it - queer
@shaams This is so degenerate, I’m not sure there’s even a lesson to be learned in here for 90% of people.
“I lost my whole 45m portfolio”
“Omg how”
“Leveraged crypto meme coins like poopcat”
“Oh, that was retarded”
@RespectIsVital If you had the records of those with high wealth or income you’d also find most make charitable donations.
You people seem to believe there are these mega rich boogeymen who soak up wealth and run away with it. Its just not true.
It’s not about his wealth, it’s the principle.