GeoConfirmed @Geoconfirmed - Twitter Profile

Pinned Tweet

5 months ago

The State of the "X" OSINT Community, a message to the 'OSINT' accounts. Let’s all take a step back and look at the broader “OSINT” community, especially after Elon Musk’s changes. What do we actually see? Engagement Farmers. The majority of these accounts claim to do OSINT and even include it in their name. But most of them don’t do the work. At best, they’re bad news aggregators — copying and pasting information without citing sources, rewriting descriptions to grab attention, and shaping opinions based on unverified data. They chase attention, not accuracy. In other words, they’re engagement farmers. These accounts make up most of what’s now labeled as “OSINT.” News aggregators. Then there’s a second group — the news aggregators who at least add some value. They collect and organize information into threads or perform basic analyses that make data easier to understand. Importantly, they also give proper credit to the original sources. For them, it’s not about being the first to post — it’s about gathering reliable information and presenting it clearly and responsibly. OSINT. Finally, there are the 'real' OSINT accounts. A definition: "OSINT is the practice of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting publicly available information from open sources to produce insights for decision-making, threat assessment, and investigations." The real OSINT accounts go beyond aggregation. They verify locations, identify equipment types, and perform full investigations — turning raw data into actionable, verified insights. Mistakes. And yes, even OSINT accounts make mistakes. Why? Because OSINT is only as accurate as the information available at the time of analysis. That’s why verifying the basic data used in any analysis must always be a priority. Crediting sources is equally important — it allows others to understand the reasoning behind the analysis and, if necessary, to verify the same sources independently. When new information emerges, earlier conclusions may turn out to be flawed. It’s then the responsibility of the OSINT account to evaluate whether the new data impacts the final assessment. If it does, the correct course of action is clear: delete the original post and start again. Deletion is the only acceptable response when an error alters the conclusion. GeoConfirmed. We know where we stand: GeoConfirmed is a verification community of more than 100 volunteers, dedicated to answering factual “where” questions. Does that make us an OSINT account? That’s not for us to decide. In four years, GeoConfirmed has made seven mistakes — just seven. Each time, we reviewed our verification process, because seven out of more than 60,000 published geolocations is still seven too many. That’s the level of responsibility our admin team has committed to. We guarantee where something happened — not what happened, and not when. With the exemption for our 'investigations' where we used the geolocation as a basis for a further analysis. And in every one of those seven cases, we deleted our tweets and posted corrections. How many accounts, even 'OSINT' accounts, get fact-based feedback, even Community Notes, but never make corrections? For them, it’s not about the facts. The initial tweet draws attention — and that’s what matters most to them. How to handle mistakes. Everyone can make mistakes. There is only one correct response to a mistake: delete the tweet and post a new one with the correction. Let’s be very clear about this. Accounts that post a “correction” in a follow-up tweet are still benefiting from the attention generated by the original post. They aren’t prioritizing facts — they’re preserving engagement. The correction will never reach as many people as the original tweet, meaning the misinformation or disinformation continues to spread. Deleting the mistaken tweet and reposting it with the correct information is the only responsible solution. --- So, if you call yourself an OSINT account, ask yourself this: Am I part of the third group? Am I doing what should be expected from an OSINT account? If the answer is no, then you are not an OSINT account and shouldn’t present yourself as one. Unless you take concrete steps to meet the standards of real OSINT work, you’re not contributing to the field: you’re merely chasing attention under a false label. That doesn’t make you an OSINT account — it makes you a fraud, using OSINT for attention, and adding noise instead of value. --- Pictured: GeoConfirmed’s admin team verified geolocations conducted by the GeoConfirmed volunteer community, as well as contributions from other volunteers, related to the Ukraine–Russia conflict. Over 50,000+ GeoConfirmed locations where events occured. (https://t.co/IJABboi2yG)

GeoConfirmed's tweet photo. The State of the "X" OSINT Community,
a message to the 'OSINT' accounts.

Let’s all take a step back and look at the broader “OSINT” community, especially after Elon Musk’s changes.

What do we actually see?

Engagement Farmers.

The majority of these accounts claim to do OSINT and even include it in their name. But most of them don’t do the work. At best, they’re bad news aggregators — copying and pasting information without citing sources, rewriting descriptions to grab attention, and shaping opinions based on unverified data. They chase attention, not accuracy. In other words, they’re engagement farmers.
These accounts make up most of what’s now labeled as “OSINT.”

News aggregators.

Then there’s a second group — the news aggregators who at least add some value. They collect and organize information into threads or perform basic analyses that make data easier to understand. Importantly, they also give proper credit to the original sources. For them, it’s not about being the first to post — it’s about gathering reliable information and presenting it clearly and responsibly.

OSINT.

Finally, there are the 'real' OSINT accounts.

A definition: "OSINT is the practice of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting publicly available information from open sources to produce insights for decision-making, threat assessment, and investigations."

The real OSINT accounts go beyond aggregation.
They verify locations, identify equipment types, and perform full investigations — turning raw data into actionable, verified insights.

Mistakes.

And yes, even OSINT accounts make mistakes. Why?

Because OSINT is only as accurate as the information available at the time of analysis. That’s why verifying the basic data used in any analysis must always be a priority. Crediting sources is equally important — it allows others to understand the reasoning behind the analysis and, if necessary, to verify the same sources independently.

When new information emerges, earlier conclusions may turn out to be flawed. It’s then the responsibility of the OSINT account to evaluate whether the new data impacts the final assessment. If it does, the correct course of action is clear: delete the original post and start again. Deletion is the only acceptable response when an error alters the conclusion.

GeoConfirmed.

We know where we stand:
GeoConfirmed is a verification community of more than 100 volunteers, dedicated to answering factual “where” questions.
Does that make us an OSINT account? That’s not for us to decide.

In four years, GeoConfirmed has made seven mistakes — just seven. Each time, we reviewed our verification process, because seven out of more than 60,000 published geolocations is still seven too many.
That’s the level of responsibility our admin team has committed to. We guarantee where something happened — not what happened, and not when. With the exemption for our 'investigations' where we used the geolocation as a basis for a further analysis.
And in every one of those seven cases, we deleted our tweets and posted corrections.

How many accounts, even 'OSINT' accounts, get fact-based feedback, even Community Notes, but never make corrections? For them, it’s not about the facts. The initial tweet draws attention — and that’s what matters most to them.

How to handle mistakes.

Everyone can make mistakes. There is only one correct response to a mistake: delete the tweet and post a new one with the correction.
Let’s be very clear about this. Accounts that post a “correction” in a follow-up tweet are still benefiting from the attention generated by the original post. They aren’t prioritizing facts — they’re preserving engagement. The correction will never reach as many people as the original tweet, meaning the misinformation or disinformation continues to spread.

Deleting the mistaken tweet and reposting it with the correct information is the only responsible solution.

---

So, if you call yourself an OSINT account, ask yourself this:

Am I part of the third group? Am I doing what should be expected from an OSINT account?

If the answer is no, then you are not an OSINT account and shouldn’t present yourself as one. Unless you take concrete steps to meet the standards of real OSINT work, you’re not contributing to the field: you’re merely chasing attention under a false label. That doesn’t make you an OSINT account — it makes you a fraud, using OSINT for attention, and adding noise instead of value.

---

Pictured:
GeoConfirmed’s admin team verified geolocations conducted by the GeoConfirmed volunteer community, as well as contributions from other volunteers, related to the Ukraine–Russia conflict.
Over 50,000+ GeoConfirmed locations where events occured.
(https://t.co/IJABboi2yG)

102

3K

456

851

489K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

1 day ago

Geolocation: https://t.co/ODnsmAZzlJ

Toaster @klinger66

1 day ago

@usf_army @GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap 45.3346, 36.4662 0:11-0:32 Kerch oil terminal hit and on fire see also: https://t.co/Q1OQoUMHkD https://t.co/R0vlfxAqLJ

klinger66's tweet photo. @usf_army @GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap
45.3346, 36.4662 0:11-0:32 Kerch oil terminal hit and on fire
see also:
https://t.co/Q1OQoUMHkD
https://t.co/R0vlfxAqLJ https://t.co/ThLkDCBhXw

2

25

0

11K

0

11

2

0

6K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

1 day ago

GeoConfirmed conflictmap UKR. 0:11-0:32 - Kerch oil terminal hit and on fire. 45.3346, 36.4662 8GQR8FM8+RF Kerch GeoLocated by @klinger66, @neonhandrail and @Grimm_Intel Reported involved units: 1st Seperate SBS Center ▸ Ukrainian Unmanned Systems Forces (SBS/USF) Geolocation: https://t.co/gbsSJD27jr related: https://t.co/egZDdXEE3g https://t.co/hch3mkuzUZ Location: https://t.co/VNneeusb13 Sources: https://t.co/obQN2ykaNJ https://t.co/ynzAW7x1Jg Visit our map: https://t.co/g9OP1aPlGP

🇺🇦 Unmanned Systems Forces

@usf_army

1 day ago

🔥 USF Struck an Oil Depot, Gas Infrastructure, Radar Systems, and Enemy Logistics During the night of June 21, operators of the Unmanned Systems Forces struck fuel infrastructure, radar assets, gas compressor stations, and enemy transport in the operational depth of temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine. Operation highlights: In Crimea, operators of the @1usc_army struck the oil depot of the Kerch oil terminal. In Crimea, operators of the 1st Separate Center struck a Kasta-2E2 radar system near Kurortne and a Nebo-U radar system near Kerch. In Crimea, operators of the 9th Kairos Battalion of the @414magyarbirds struck gas compressor stations near Aromatne, Zhuravlivka, and Kliuchi. In Donetsk Oblast, operators of the @k_2army Brigade struck a fuel tanker carrying petroleum products near Horlivka. In Zaporizhzhia Oblast, operators of the 412th Nemesis Brigade struck enemy logistics transport near Osypenko and Terpinnia. Systematic strikes against fuel infrastructure, radar assets, and logistics reduce the enemy’s ability to sustain its forces, support movement, and protect facilities in temporarily occupied territories. USF: One step ahead!

16

908

183

55

142K

1

32

6

1

9K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

4 days ago

Geolocation: https://t.co/2wsj3oUAOd

Neonhandrail @neonhandrail

4 days ago

@Osinttechnical New footage confirms that an errant Russian surface to air missile was responsible for the tank roof toss at the Moscow Oil Refinery this morning. POV 55.642442, 37.853616 Tank hit likely 55.652891, 37.809835 @GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua

neonhandrail's tweet photo. @Osinttechnical New footage confirms that an errant Russian surface to air missile was responsible for the tank roof toss at the Moscow Oil Refinery this morning.
POV 55.642442, 37.853616
Tank hit likely 55.652891, 37.809835
@GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua https://t.co/qAJoANWcMO

2

205

57

19

43K

0

18

2

1

6K

Who to follow

WarTranslated

@wartranslated

🇪🇪 Estonian-born blogger | https://t.co/olceNoeCxI | https://t.co/JckIQOdLob

Anton Gerashchenko

@Gerashchenko_en

Ukrainian patriot. Advisor to Internal Affairs Minister (2021-2023). Institute of the Future founder. Support volunteer translators https://t.co/nWSASMUo29

OSINTtechnical

@Osinttechnical

PAI enjoyer, OSINT guy @hntrbrkmedia, my views/freezing cold takes are my own. For full disclosures, visit https://t.co/JOtQx4pI3e.

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

4 days ago

GeoConfirmed conflictmap UKR. A Russian surface-to-air missile, likely launched from a Russian MANPADS, pursued a Ukrainian drone and detonated a Russian oil tank. Rough location of the tank - 55.652891, 37.809835 9G7VMR35+5W Kapotnya District, Moscow, Russia GeoLocated by @Grimm_Intel and @neonhandrail Geolocation: https://t.co/RdO6Mh4aPZ related: https://t.co/0p913fCKwH https://t.co/1wIrPfo6oe Location: https://t.co/Sek6iDkCj7 Sources: Vid1 https://t.co/2eY9Vvu5gw https://t.co/92rvnU6yYa longer: https://t.co/40FTDlN4wO Vid2 https://t.co/HMWxmd43C8 https://t.co/YywPzKBgrO Visit our map: https://t.co/g9OP1aPlGP

OSINTtechnical

@Osinttechnical

4 days ago

New footage confirms that an errant Russian surface to air missile was responsible for the tank roof toss at the Moscow Oil Refinery this morning.

2K

66K

8K

12K

8M

4

62

6

9

9K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

Geolocation: https://t.co/cWeflFVPc2

Miki RuizdeValbuena @MikiValbuena

22 days ago

@tuitero_martin 44.839836, 34.331322 Pereval'ne - Crimea

3

16

0

1

10K

0

10

0

2

8K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

GeoConfirmed conflictmap UKR. Fire at a building building of the 126th Separate Coastal Defence Brigade, aftermath of a reported Ukrainian strike that was carried out using 2 missiles and 2 jet UAVs. 44.839836, 34.331322 R8QJ+MCW Chaikovs'ke GeoLocated by @MikiValbuena Reported involved units: 126th Separate Guards Coastal Defence Brigade ▸ 18th Combined Arms Army ▸ Southern Military District ▸ Russian Ground Forces Geolocation: https://t.co/g6b3I8MoMd Location: https://t.co/OBf7BsoO7T Sources: https://t.co/3zYiWdGngb (1/4) https://t.co/THv5kmrFEe More information https://t.co/Pk3vpf7XU3 Visit our map: https://t.co/g9OP1aPlGP

Zeldamice

@Zeldamices

18 days ago

@MikiValbuena @tuitero_martin Footage from source: https://t.co/8wiRWtydng (4/4)

0

2

0

11K

1

21

1

2

10K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

Geolocation: https://t.co/bjmulyO3rt

Neonhandrail @neonhandrail

18 days ago

Additional footage & damage to a second barracks on a Russian base, near Pereval'ne TOT Crimea 44.839227, 34.331089 R8QJ+MCW Chaikovs'ke @GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua Source: https://t.co/87HDM5TzN7 media 2/4 &3/4

neonhandrail's tweet photo. Additional footage & damage to a second barracks
on a Russian base, near Pereval'ne TOT Crimea
44.839227, 34.331089
R8QJ+MCW Chaikovs'ke
@GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua
Source: https://t.co/87HDM5TzN7
media 2/4 &3/4 https://t.co/BCHcaLTPUg

2

16

4

3

8K

0

14

0

7K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

GeoConfirmed conflictmap UKR. Damaged building of the 126th Separate Coastal Defence Brigade, aftermath of a reported Ukrainian strike that was carried out using 2 missiles and 2 jet UAVs. 44.839227, 34.331089 R8QJ+MCW Chaikovs'ke GeoLocated by @neonhandrail Reported involved units: 126th Separate Guards Coastal Defence Brigade ▸ 18th Combined Arms Army ▸ Southern Military District ▸ Russian Ground Forces Geolocation: https://t.co/3QgNTcmBEG Location: https://t.co/qgBRzgZyJR Sources: https://t.co/vFoqNS2ONI (2/4&3/4) https://t.co/THv5kmrFEe SAT https://t.co/KddDqkjzm0 More information https://t.co/Pk3vpf7XU3 Visit our map: https://t.co/g9OP1aPlGP

Zeldamice

@Zeldamices

18 days ago

@neonhandrail @GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua Footage from source: (2/4&3/4) https://t.co/qLSsLQalbx

0

1

0

8K

1

18

1

0

8K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

Geolocation: https://t.co/U2dZCDV8d6

Miki RuizdeValbuena @MikiValbuena

18 days ago

@GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua 1º Centro Separado de Drones Dron sobre Sistema Pantsir-S1 0:54-1:30 Aprox 45.906799, 34.845292 Strelkóvoye - Kherson Ob @GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua

MikiValbuena's tweet photo. @GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua 1º Centro Separado de Drones
Dron sobre Sistema Pantsir-S1
0:54-1:30
Aprox
45.906799, 34.845292
Strelkóvoye - Kherson Ob
@GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua https://t.co/cOK50YyvrR

1

3

0

7K

0

9

0

7K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

GeoConfirmed conflictmap UKR. 0:54-1:28 - Rough location - A Russian Pantsir-S1 DECOY is destroyed by a presumed FP-2 drone from 1st Seperate SBS Center. 45.906799, 34.845292 WR4W+P47 Strilkove, Kherson Oblast, Ukraine GeoLocated by @MikiValbuena Reported involved units: 1st Seperate SBS Center ▸ Ukrainian Unmanned Systems Forces (SBS/USF) Geolocation: https://t.co/t3OHstwEQY Location: https://t.co/7CPCGdCmAL Sources: https://t.co/SFSp1d2cqC https://t.co/f0ENy0lLqt More information https://t.co/yiiHeHuqjI Visit our map: https://t.co/g9OP1aPlGP

🇺🇦 Unmanned Systems Forces

@usf_army

19 days ago

USF Struck a Svetlyak-Class Patrol Ship, a Pantsir-S1 Air Defense System, an RSBN-4N Navigation System, Logistics Assets, and Other Enemy Targets Operation highlights: 🎯 In temporarily occupied Crimea, operators of the @1usc_army struck a Project 10410 Svetlyak-class border patrol ship used for coastal patrol and maritime surveillance missions. • In Kherson Oblast, operators of the @1usc_army destroyed a Pantsir-S1 air defense missile and gun system, one of the key components of the enemy's air defense network. • In temporarily occupied Crimea, operators of the @1usc_army struck an RSBN-4N short-range radio navigation system used to support enemy aviation. • In temporarily occupied Crimea, operators of the @Raid_413 struck locomotives used to sustain enemy military logistics. • In Donetsk Oblast, operators of the @k_2army Brigade struck transformers supporting enemy military infrastructure. • Also in Donetsk Oblast, operators of the 1st Separate Center struck fuel storage tankers. The operations were conducted in coordination with the USF Deep Strike Center. The Unmanned Systems Forces continue to systematically degrade the enemy’s combat capabilities by targeting air defense assets, logistics infrastructure, and critical command-and-control systems. USF: One step ahead!

9

455

97

19

28K

1

32

3

2

8K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

Geolocation: https://t.co/Vh3zmjb2JU

Neonhandrail @neonhandrail

17 days ago

@Exilenova_plus Ust-Labinsk oil depot on fire POV 45.219355, 39.683064 media 2/2 @GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua @Osinttechnical source https://t.co/pbZEjuqS9u media 2/2

neonhandrail's tweet photo. @Exilenova_plus Ust-Labinsk oil depot on fire
POV 45.219355, 39.683064 media 2/2
@GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua @Osinttechnical
source https://t.co/pbZEjuqS9u media 2/2 https://t.co/5I6NMBgxbr

2

13

3

1

7K

0

7

0

6K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

GeoConfirmed conflictmap UKR. Point of view looking in a northern direction - Fire and huge plumes of smoke at he Ust-Labinsk oil depot following a reported Ukrainian attack. 45.219355, 39.683064 6M9M+P6W Ust-Labinsk, Krasnodar Krai, Russia GeoLocated by @neonhandrail Geolocation: https://t.co/WI5qdvxTzm Location: https://t.co/JrjGrvnCOZ Sources: (2/2) https://t.co/dsxuhmImKb (2/2) https://t.co/tl1IzeP1Dd More information https://t.co/EqBZsBcDKD Visit our map: https://t.co/g9OP1aPlGP

Exilenova+

@Exilenova_plus

17 days ago

more from ust labinsk

3

320

86

10

19K

1

31

4

0

8K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

Geolocation: https://t.co/9WHokVds0t

Zeldamice

@Zeldamices

17 days ago

@clashreport @GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap Location of the building - 55.788220, 37.677713 Proof

0

8

1

4

6K

0

7

1

5K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

GeoConfirmed conflictmap UKR. Reported Russian Pantsir-S1 air defense system being airlifted by a Mi-26 helicopter onto the rooftops of a high-rise building in Moscow. Another helicopter is visible in the video. 55.78822, 37.677713 QMQH+73P Sokolniki District, Moscow, Russia GeoLocated by @Zeldamices Geolocation: https://t.co/b5MfV1w1Bq Location: https://t.co/Q6CSQhWh0m Sources: https://t.co/y3LhnhKA8m Visit our map: https://t.co/g9OP1aPlGP

Clash Report

@clashreport

17 days ago

Russian Pantsir-SMD air defense systems being airlifted by Mi-26 helicopters onto rooftops of high-rise buildings in Moscow.

12

611

67

50

101K

1

22

4

3

8K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

Geolocation: https://t.co/RATTRcdksV

Miki RuizdeValbuena @MikiValbuena

18 days ago

16º Cuerpo Kamaz RU destruido. Puente sobre el río Vovcha el 3 de junio. 50.292920, 36.945975 Vovchans'k - Kharkiv Ob @GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua https://t.co/JhhGsmtcL2

MikiValbuena's tweet photo. 16º Cuerpo
Kamaz RU destruido. Puente sobre el río Vovcha el 3 de junio.
50.292920, 36.945975
Vovchans'k - Kharkiv Ob
@GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @AndrewPerpetua
https://t.co/JhhGsmtcL2 https://t.co/FzLXr8Kcyi

1

29

2

0

11K

0

7

1

0

5K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

GeoConfirmed conflictmap UKR. Ukrainian FPV drone strike on a Russian vehicle, reportedly trying to establish a pontoon bridge over the vovcha river 50.29292, 36.945975 7WVW+599 Vovchans'k, Kharkiv Oblast, Ukraine GeoLocated by @MikiValbuena Reported involved units: 16th Army Corps ▸ Ukrainian Ground Forces Geolocation: https://t.co/oPjmx1qXIV Location: https://t.co/Brg295jSQI Sources: https://t.co/0mpbckZHVK https://t.co/ARyRJGxbhM Visit our map: https://t.co/g9OP1aPlGP

Manu @PuenteUribarri

18 days ago

El 16º Cuerpo🇺🇦 informa que el 3 de junio a las 5:00 los rusos intentaron montar un puente de pontones sobre el río Vovcha y no salió bien, lo evitaron con minas y drones y el vehículo quedó destruido https://t.co/UHBCxkRb3r

2

272

32

5

14K

2

26

2

1

7K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

Geolocation: https://t.co/uhKBqSeVTH

Dominik @99Dominik_

19 days ago

Deceased civilian after a Russian attack in Kramatorsk. 48.730848, 37.590734 Kramatorsk, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine @GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @Cen4infoRes @AndrewPerpetua

99Dominik_'s tweet photo. Deceased civilian after a Russian attack in Kramatorsk.

48.730848, 37.590734
Kramatorsk, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine
@GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @Cen4infoRes @AndrewPerpetua https://t.co/LPSwXNhfYp

2

23

4

3

7K

0

5

0

1

5K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

GeoConfirmed conflictmap UKR. 0:05-0:09 - Deceased civilian after a reported Russian attack in Kramatorsk. 48.730848, 37.590734 PHJR+87Q Kramatorsk, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine GeoLocated by @99Dominik_ Geolocation: https://t.co/BC5E7308Xv Location: https://t.co/H8mDUPdEKL Sources: https://t.co/ogu9gsbqRg https://t.co/UgYWqvfxgw Visit our map: https://t.co/g9OP1aPlGP

2

12

2

1

6K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

Geolocation: https://t.co/q2yibToeeM

Dominik @99Dominik_

19 days ago

A Russian FPV drone damaged a vehicle belonging to the "Proliska" humanitarian mission. 48.724760, 37.540512 Kramatorsk, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine @GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @Cen4infoRes @AndrewPerpetua

99Dominik_'s tweet photo. A Russian FPV drone damaged a vehicle belonging to the "Proliska" humanitarian mission.

48.724760, 37.540512
Kramatorsk, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine
@GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @Cen4infoRes @AndrewPerpetua https://t.co/rNhWV3DJs5

2

32

9

6

6K

0

4

0

5K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

16 days ago

GeoConfirmed conflictmap UKR. A reported Russian FPV drone strike damaged a vehicle belonging to the "Proliska" humanitarian mission 48.72476, 37.540512 PGFR+W62 Kramatorsk, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine GeoLocated by @99Dominik_ Geolocation: https://t.co/3SVZZB8zAb Location: https://t.co/HUoE4IEMij Sources: https://t.co/CiPWs7pyoc https://t.co/gBnSDk4u5M Visit our map: https://t.co/g9OP1aPlGP

Dominik @99Dominik_

19 days ago

@GeoConfirmed @UAControlMap @Cen4infoRes @AndrewPerpetua Published on 03/06/2026. https://t.co/X4gMiv7Y9Z

0

4

0

6K

2

12

2

0

6K

GeoConfirmed

@GeoConfirmed

Who to follow

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users