ghuff

[ghuff @ghuff]

@Derek_Rumpler @PapaPiccolino @maklelan It's because there is obviously no magic happening in our world, so they look for it in all kinds of obscure ways and that makes the "magic" they find really pathetic like in this example.

[ghuff @ghuff]

@gatsbyexe_ How convenient for you since you have no explanation as to why you forgot that Dan directly challenged Jason, but yet you changed it to be "Protestantism".

That sounds like the "is literate" bar wasn't cleared for you, right?

[ghuff @ghuff]

@gatsbyexe_ You didn't explain it though.

If you want to start, you can begin by explaining how Jason Howerton is a stand-in for Protestantism writ large.

[ghuff @ghuff]

@gatsbyexe_ That’s because you completely misunderstand the point and made up details to cover up the deficiency of what you don’t understand.

Also, none of that is whataboutism.

[ghuff @ghuff]

@gatsbyexe_ “I explained why it’s whataboutism in simple terms”

No you didn’t.

[ghuff @ghuff]

@inscripturated Still does not have anything to do with what I asked you.

Are you just an LLM-driven account? 🤔

[ghuff @ghuff]

@inscripturated That’s not what I asked you at all.

Do you have trouble reading? Why should anyone put any stock into your opinions on written Scripture when you can’t even comprehend clearly written English by a native speaker in 2026?

[ghuff @ghuff]

@inscripturated Where did you get that idea?

You didn’t, it was all you could make up to respond with.

So again, I ask you, why do you think it’s not a sin to lie about watching the video as long as you’re doing so on social media? Or do you not agree it’s a sin to lie this way?

[ghuff @ghuff]

@inscripturated “I did though. That’s the thing. I did.”

You clearly did not as your subsequent replies have demonstrated.

Do you believe that the commandment against bearing false witness doesn’t apply to you if you’re doing so on social media?

[ghuff @ghuff]

@gatsbyexe_ “Dan’s tweet is blatant whataboutism”

Not at all, but thanks for letting everyone know you’ve heard the word “whataboutism” and come on social media to use it yourself without knowing what it means.

[ghuff @ghuff]

@lacrosse_al @vote_velazquez Yes.

That’s why you had to resort to lying.

[ghuff @ghuff]

@lacrosse_al There is no new information, just people like you who seemingly can't hold any kind of conversation without lying constantly.

[ghuff @ghuff]

@lacrosse_al They didn't get suspicious, that's just you telling a second lie after you lied about how "Why didn’t they say he had the flu two weeks ago?"

When you need e rebuttal, you just make up a lie apparently.

[ghuff @ghuff]

@lacrosse_al "Why didn’t they say he had the flu two weeks ago?"

Talarico himself said he had the flu two weeks ago, why did you lie?

[ghuff @ghuff]

@lacrosse_al I'm not pretending like Ken Paxton wouldn't continue to campaign even if he was contagious with the flu and spread it to his supporters during campaign staff, you're the one making it "unmanly" or whatever to not do that.

Perhaps you reject germ theory because it's only a theory

[ghuff @ghuff]

@lacrosse_al Yes, we all know Ken Paxton would be more than happy to not stop campaigning if he came down with the flu and spread it all around to his supporters.

[ghuff @ghuff]

@MarcusFidelicus What does that have to do with the subject at hand exactly?

Oh, nothing at all? You're just attempting a tu quoque fallacy? Oh, okay.

[ghuff @ghuff]

@_Davreek_Rahimi Except for the part where it does not do that at all.

But if you think "reading the article" and "reading the headline" are synonymous, I can see where you could come to that conclusion.

[ghuff @ghuff]

@AndyFred42 No it doesn't.

[ghuff @ghuff]

@SkyisFalling999 If God can command them to cut off their own foreskin, he can even more easily command them not to own other people as property.