Dr. David Morens' indictment marks the first criminal charges for COVID-era crimes in America.
The momentum to demand justice is stronger than ever, but we need national momentum to #IndictFauci. @SenRandPaul
Help the COVID Justice Resolution move forward.
→ TAKE ACTION: https://t.co/fgrLORSjFy
@IfollowQDoYou@RivcoCitizen@ChadBianco SB277 AND SB276 force us in California to vaccinate in order to attend school. Bianco, as governor, could stop the madness.
🚨URGENT: Congress is about to wipe out your right to sue pesticide companies, quietly, tucked in a new spending bill.
Section 453 blocks updated health warnings and gives chemical manufacturers immunity even when people are harmed.
Cancer. Parkinson’s. Infertility.
57,000+ products. Zero accountability.
This must be pulled NOW before it reaches the floor.
Senators are going home for the holidays without passing the No Tax Dollars For Terrorists Act. It remains stalled in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. That means your tax dollars will be sent to the Taliban even during the holidays.
Lots of people asking me in DM about infant vaccines. Please watch this whole four part infant immunity series that starts with conception. Please bookmark, share it and give it to people who have questions. That's why I made this. I spent a lot of time and energy putting it together and released it to help you all. YouTube nuked all of my videos so they are now all up here. There's lots to choose from but here is the infant immunity series.
https://t.co/MlEd3ERagQ
https://t.co/EtWbl9Kc4S
https://t.co/xv7Eswa2ln
https://t.co/nO20HQ4cZ7
https://t.co/8UDPR2ZG4R
https://t.co/5uSz4TJIM2
"Vaccines Have Caused Debilitating Permanent Allergies To Peanuts, To Dairy, To Eggs, To Meat & So Many More."
Robert F Kennedy Jr
"Injecting The Aluminum Adjuvant With A Protein... Has Caused 30X The Rate Of Allergies In Vaccinated Children Compared To Unvaccinated Children."
Aluminum plus a peanut excipient causes a lifelong allergy to peanuts.
Aluminum plus a dairy protein causes a lifelong allergy to dairy.
Aluminum plus a latex protein causes a lifelong allergy to latex.
Aluminum plus a meat protein causes a lifelong allergy to meat.
The Aluminum Adjuvant will also give you an allergy to natural materials that are in the ambient environment at the time the vaccine was given.
If you get a vaccine when there's a Timothy Weed or Ragweed outbreak, you can suddenly come down with a lifelong allergy to Timothy Weed or Ragweed.
Research by Anthony Mawson has shown that vaccinated children have 30X the rate of Allergic Rhinitis as kids who are unvaccinated.
And 36% higher rate of asthma diagnosis In children who are 2-5 years old.
We created an allergy epidemic within this generation by giving them vaccines.
Common Excipients Used With Aluminum In Vaccines:
🔴Peanut--causes lifelong peanut allergy.
🔴Egg Protein--responsible for egg & poultry allergies.
🔴Neomycin Antibiotic--causes antibiotic resistance & antibiotic allergies.
🔴Yeast Protein--causes lifelong Brewer's Yeast & Baker's Yeast allergies.
🔴PEG Polyethylene Glycol--causes a lifelong allergy to this polymer widely used in food, cosmetics & medications.
🔴Gelatin--pork gelatin used in vaccines is one cause of AGS Alpha-Gal Syndrome meat allergy.
🔴Casein Dairy Protein--causes lifelong dairy intolerance.
Even The Institute of Medicine (IOM) confirmed that food proteins in vaccines cause food allergies, in its 2011 report.
Nobel Laureate Charles Richet demonstrated over a hundred years ago that injecting a protein into animals or humans causes immune system sensitization to that protein.
Subsequent exposure to the protein results in allergic reactions or anaphylaxis.
👇Proteins In Vaccines Induce Food Allergies👇
https://t.co/epb0eW56O5
👇NND & Allergies In Vaccinated Children👇
https://t.co/CljdSMpzz3
👇Mass Vaccination & High Rates Of Allergies👇
https://t.co/wbC3TfDo7V
Speaker: @RobertKennedyJr@SecKennedy
Video: @toxins_in_children
@MdBreathe I don't know if it's the shots or not causing the autoimmune disease epidemic, but we decided the benefits don't outweigh the risk, and I'm happy with our choice.
@MdBreathe My mom is 62. She's NEVER had a vaccine. I've seen her sick one time in all my 36 years. I have 4 kids. One got the Hep B at birth, she has polyarticular juvenile arthritis. The other 3 are completely unvaccinated and out of all 3 we've had one ear infection, and a couple colds.
Ryan McWeeny writes…
Sadly, Mike is one of many demonstrably intelligent and reasonable people that has somehow been captivated and caught up in the crossing over from healthy skepticism to conspiratorial mysticism. I will never understand how this happens, but they all eventually become convinced of some thing or another and put the burden of proof on you to disprove their “evidence” which deceptively looks as though it supports their claim by the sheer nature of its unfalsifiability… which is a far cry from it being true.
Hello, Mr. McWeeny, and thanks for your comment. I found it this morning on a flight to LA, buried in a flurry of similar disappointment regarding my recent conversation with Gavin de Becker about his new book, Forbidden Facts: Government Deceit & Suppression About Brain Damage from Childhood Vaccines.” In spite of my “demonstrable intelligence” (thanks for that!), you seem to believe I'm mistaken to be curious about the role vaccines might be having on childhood illness. Obviously, you’re not alone. There’s a great hew and cry in the comment section today, and more pearl clutching than usual. But I wonder, Mr. McWeeny, what else you might have in common with those who believe the science is settled. Four possibilities come to mind.
1. You didn’t read the book (which you can get here. https://t.co/V0GinUPSrp)
2. You didn’t watch to the interview (which you can watch here. https://t.co/QBIREyXGf5)
3. You have no intention of doing either (which you can accomplish pretty much anywhere.)
4. You believe, like so many others who actually spelled it out for me (often in CAPS and with multiple exclamation points,) that with respect to all things vaccine-related, “THE SCIENCE HAS BEEN SETTLED!!!”
To your credit, you didn’t use those actual words, but lots of others did, and I’m wondering if you share their desire to throw the scientific method out the window at a time when both science and skepticism are so critical to our country. Forgive me if you already know this, but I feel it needs to be said, even from a non-scientist like me.
The scientific method has less to do with “settling” things and more to do with “testing” things. This is because scientists are always learning and, therefore, often mistaken. It’s the essence of the job. Once upon a time the best minds in science believed the sun revolved around the earth. The finest doctors drained most of the blood from George Washington in a failed attempt to save his life. Like bloodletting, lobotomies were very common, as were tonsillectomies and radical mastectomies. Physicians used to recommend smoking and diets high in sugar, and it was the scientific community who put poor Iggy Semmelweis – the man who paved the way for modern germ theory - into an insane asylum for suggesting that doctors should wash their hands before performing surgery, where he died, ironically, of blood poisoning.
Honest question. Mr. McWeeny, for you and all the others who believe @GDBAProtects is a “science denier” and I’m some sort of conspiracy nut. Would you have supported Galileo’s arrest and imprisonment for daring to question the way our solar system actually worked? Would you have accused him of putting the burden of proof on you to disprove the “evidence” by the sheer nature of its unfalsifiability? Most people alive back then did exactly that, and I wonder if you’d be among them. I wonder the same about myself.
Not to belabor the point, scientists are not supposed to be certain; they’re supposed to be skeptical – especially when they think they’re correct. They’re supposed to doubt their own findings, and then, if their findings are peer reviewed and accepted as fact, and a consensus forms, a proper scientist - like a proper journalist - will keep his ego and his personal opinion out of it. They will remain objective, ever mindful that new evidence or new information might demand a new conclusion. Science requires humility, along with curiosity, and most of all, doubt. Your position, Mr. McWeeny, requires arrogance, certainty, and a level of institutional trust that seems naïve in today’s environment. And no, you don’t need to be a scientist to know this.
Of course, there’s another reason I’m open to the possibility that we’ve been misled, and that’s because we’ve been misled before. Many times. Do you not recall the cover-ups around Agent Orange, Johnson’s Baby Powder, the water in Flint Michigan, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, the Thalidomide Crisis, the Opioid Crisis, or so many others? Have you forgotten the countless experts who assured us that masking, social distancing, and endless boosters were all scientifically sound? Have you forgotten the way our elected officials, our media, and so many of our top scientists demanded – in the immortal words of Eric Cartman - to “respect my authoritay!!! I fear that you have, Mr. McWeeny. And I worry that lots of other people have, too.
I doubt repetition will help my cause, but I’ll say it again. I haven’t said we’ve been lied to about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. But I’m certainly open to that possibility, because the evidence is compelling. Childhood diseases have exploded in the last two decades. Is it really “conspiratorial mysticism” to wonder if the exploding vaccine schedule might have something to do with that? I know, correlation does not equal causation, and yes, I’m familiar with the Dunning-Kruger Effect, another popular accusation leveled at me in the comment section. (What else would you expect from a “demonstrably intelligent” non-scientist like me?) But why is it so hard for an educated man such as yourself to understand that we can no longer hope to persuade the masses to believe a claim simply because it’s supported by people with the proper credentials? What’s the downside of challenging the status quo, especially in light of new data, or conducting new studies to see what the latest research yields?
It's true that Gavin’s book is controversial, and it’s also true that he is not a scientist. Indeed, he makes the point repeatedly throughout his book and our conversation. But it’s also true that he’s earned the trust and respect of several dozen world leaders, including several US presidents and countless CEOs who have trusted him with their lives and the lives of their families. He’s not some hack writer trying to get rich by riling up the masses. Gavin is already rich. He’s also concerned that a lot of Americans have been misled about something profound and consequential. Yes, he is skeptical of the claim that all vaccines are “safe and effective,” but every single claim in his book is backed by an astonishing amount of research and data, all of which are accessible through hundreds of QR codes throughout.
So, what’s the problem, exactly? Why are you and so many others threatened by a book that encourages people to look beyond the credentials of an expert and a conversation that encourages people to assume a measure of personal responsibility? And why do you suppose there’s never been a large, robust, and completely transparent study that compares the health of thousands of vaccinated kids to the overall health of unvaccinated kids? Moreover, why do you think there’s so much opposition to conducting and publishing such a study today?
I don’t know the answer, Mr. McWeeny, but unlike you, I’m curious to find out.
PS. Gavin's book is #1 in three categories, and sends his thanks to you all.