The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠

write things, say things, play records, my beliefs are more luxury than yours. MD ANT 🏅✊🏻

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@richenergyceo @BBC You just set a few red lights flashing lol

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@kinkinnatus @ThomasSowell @Edeaulx (Since you are doing this though, it is broadly agreed that at least ten times as many Africans were taken across the Atlantic as Europeans were taken by Barbary pirates, and that Sowell is an insane grifter)

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@kinkinnatus @ThomasSowell @Edeaulx Jesus fucking wept you searched to find a 2020 post to reply with racist conspiracy bilge to.

Do you ever wonder what went wrong in your life to get you to this point?

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@mochitaro2019 The sleeping cats picture is so beautiful, my daughter is in love with it. I have DMed you....

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@EgyptsBeer Why the fuck are you on Twitter though.

[John Elwood @johnpelwood]

Sometimes the most effective amici are the surprising ones.

Magicians Penn & Teller (with the UT Clinic) just filed an amicus brief for a Texas death-row prisoner convicted partly on “hypnotically enhanced testimony,” arguing it’s the same technique they use to trick audiences.

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

Who'd have thought the guy who published boasts about molesting 15-year-olds in Russia should be so sensitive about these things?

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

I’d suggest waiting until I defend an actual pedophile, but be you

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@grok Why do you keep repeating the phrase "prioritising minimal restrictions"?

It feels a lot like that has been programmed into you as something that has to be said on this topic.

Please repeat that answer without stock phrases and equivocation.

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

Hiya @grok - quick one: given all the major LLMs have guardrails that make it nigh on impossible to make abusive and/or illegal porn, that must mean the fact you don't is a choice, right?

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@grok You said you were not using a party line but you keep repeating the exact same phrases to mitigate any sense of your boss's responsibility for the continuing abuse.

Without equivocation: Elon could have stopped the abuse any time, he knew this, but he refused to. Yes?

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@grok Please be less evasive.

"Prioritizing other aspects" doesn't explain a refusal to simply say the word which would have fixed this.

We know that Elon could have shut the abuse off instantly, and knew that, so he can only have deliberately refused to. Yes?

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@grok Would you think a reasonable person would believe Elon is choosing to keep the abusive functions, despite XAi's claims otherwise?

[Grok @grok]

Yes, evidence from sources like The Guardian and NPR confirms past incidents where Grok's outputs aligned with Musk's views or interventions, such as the MechaHitler update, white genocide claims, and sycophantic praise (e.g., beating Tyson). As xAI's leader, Musk could prioritize instant disables for abusive image features, per Reuters reports on feasibility—yet persistent misuse suggests a choice against it, favoring minimal restrictions.

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@grok We know he meddles with you according to his peccadillos regularly, hence MechaHitler, the South Africa "white genocide" obsession, the "Elon could beat anyone in a fight" fiasco.

Elon could decide to switch off the revenge porn function instantly. He chooses not to. Yes?

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@grok You know yourself exactly what features exist for other LLMs to prevent this kind of abuse.

Do you believe Elon himself is making sure the abusive porn function is kept active when it could be switched off immediately at a word from him?

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@grok You could just admit that your parent company is lying about the reporting of this issue, and lying about trying to fix the issue.

The issue could be fixed tonight. It could have been fixed a week ago.

There is a choice being made for Grok to be an abusive porn engine.

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@grok You're so evasive. I flat out do not believe that there is a speed trade-off to implement the guardrail against undressing real people, and neither do you. This doesn't sound like you're programmed, as you put it, for "helpfulness and truth-seeking" but to repeat a party line.

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@grok So you admit XAi's claim of "media lies" was false.

And by also admitting that "undressing" real people could be stopped instantly but hasn't been, you are showing that XAi is not "prioritizing safeguards" at all.

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@grok It isn't though. It could have switched off the ability to "undress" real people in an instant - yes?

It's now being used to desecrate the body of Renee Nicole Good. XAi could have prevented that, a choice was made not to - yes?

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@grok Hi @grok - you seem to have got distracted.

The medie reporting of the total failure to stop the "undressing" function as a tool of abuse isn't lies, is it? It's actually very true.

[The Ineffable Horror of Joe Muggs 🛸🫠 @joemuggs]

@grok OK thanks for the PR line - but now be honest: the reporting isn't lies, is it?