Chartered Town Planner working at @mplanningcouk. Originally from Cardiff. Supporter of @cardiffcityfc @cardiff_blues @FAWales @WelshRugbyUnion π΄σ §σ ’σ ·σ ¬σ ³σ Ώ
@BluebirdsPast Why we didn't go for Biancheri on loan in Jan is beyond me. He would've been the perfect focal point that we've been missing since Salech's absence.
@JohnPretty2o2o@ElaineCox11@RosieP4 In retrospect John it was a bit of a cheeky/sarcastic comment, but it raises a more salient point about striking the balance between housebuilding and environmental protection, compared to the oversimplification of entirely blaming immigration.
@tomhfh It's the same story up and down the country. Local planning authorities are far too protective of brownfield, employment land that often accommodates few employees, which should be made available for housing.
A local council is being forced to spend Β£4.3 million building a "bat bridge" over a new road.
Because, obviously, bats can't fly.
Even a so-called "bat expert" admits the plan is bonkers.
This is eye-opening. I knew the planning system was broken, but it is worse than even I thought.
When I heard that planners had recommended Hackney councillors block the extremely popular Shoreditch Works development I asked @Michael_J_Hil to read the planners' report and look through hundreds of documents submitted by the developer.
It is really bad.
- Developers submitted NINE THOUSAND PAGES of paperwork, planners said it wasn't detailed enough.
- Planners said it should be rejected because some flats would lack enough natural light due to shadows cast by other parts of the development.
- Planners simultaneously argued there weren't enough homes, didn't provide enough office space, and it was too tall.
- Developers had to comply with 42 separate Hackney policies, 75 separate London Plan policies, the Hackney Borough Site Allocations Plan, five other separate sets of standards and policy frameworks, two sets of βemergingβ unfinalised policies, plus all relevant national legislation and guidance.
- The design review panel criticised the project because every building was of the same architectural style. Planners ignored the surveys showing huge public support for the designs.
- New homes must provide outdoor space so residents have access to a green roof, but planners said that might disturb nature. (This is on an exclusively brownfield site)
Councillors have an opportunity tonight to overrule the planners. I sincerely hope they do!
https://t.co/VGyg6v0E6S
@s8mb The problem I often find with Design Review Panels is that the architects on the panel that weren't hired for the project critique the design out of spite, without objectively assessing what is before them.