@DoorDash: You charged me nearly $30 for your service and delivered the wrong order, which I returned to the restaurant. Now you say I’m not due a refund for your services—the service you NEVER provided?!
I will never use DOORDASH again.
@DoorDash: You charged me $30 but delivered the wrong order. I returned the wrong order to the store and got my correct order—what I PAID YOU TO DO!
Now you say you reviewed my complaint and decided I’m not due a refund for the service you NEVER provided!
DOORDASH stinks!
@DoorDash: You charged me $30 but delivered the wrong order. I returned the wrong order to the store and got my correct order—what I PAID YOU TO DO!
Now you say you reviewed my complaint and decided I’m not due a refund for the service you NEVER provided!
DOORDASH stinks!
@Tia_Lucia My org. litigates to help ex-cons pursue work as firefighters. Would love to talk w/you or your writers. Lots of other good cases that could add to storylines. https://t.co/dwII8UjxoE
In one of the most brazen examples of prosecutorial abuse in modern American history, Ralph Petty spent 20 years moonlighting as a law clerk for the same judge he argued before, effectively playing both prosecutor & judge in 300+ cases.
🧵
Watch here: https://t.co/BSjqfyqs1X
Know why you can’t sue prosecutors for even the most blatant and egregious rights-violations? Because SCOTUS is afraid that allowing such lawsuits would unleash a tidal wave of litigation against prosecutors. Let THAT sink in for a minute.
Take five minutes to be moved by this beautiful aria ('Riposa mia madre'/'Rest my mother') from the opera Isabella by @JohnEKramer and John Massaro. Then check out the other excerpts on YT. https://t.co/eakmIzh3tI
🚨NEW CASE ALERT🚨 “The government shouldn’t be able to take every dollar I’ve saved up when I’ve committed no crime,” says IJ client Kermit Warren. “I hope not only to get my money back but to stop this nightmare from happening to anyone else.” Watch now: https://t.co/N8QDZzFEAj
Just spent a few minutes helping Kermit send the webpage & video about his case to his sons and his fiancée.
When I finished, he said, "Can I see it again?" So we're gonna watch it again. 😃
This is one of the great things about @IJ!
Check it out here:
https://t.co/g7y6wLc7d2
On 6/24 #SCOTUS justices will consider whether to grant review in Carson v Makin, a Maine #schoolchoice case. IJ senior attorney Michael Bindas says, “Maine’s exclusion of religious options violates that constitutional command of neutrality.” https://t.co/q1jQBwapse