Jon Hernandez

Video Journalist for @CBCNewsBC | #GoJetsGo | Tips: [email protected]

[Coyote vs. ACME @CoyoteACMEMovie]

Remember, uphill battles end up peak. 💪 #CoyoteVsAcme

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

Get out and see this Aug. 28!!

[The Hollywood Handle @HollywoodHandle]

New poster for ‘COYOTE VS. ACME.’

Releasing in theaters on August 28.

[Super 70s Sports @Super70sSports]

If you haven’t seen Summer School multiple times, what the hell are you even doing with your life?

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

@Irfan_1x World Cup

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

@HwoodScrptReadr You haven’t met my dogs then lol

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

@BCubed_Up @yutamox @Ash22928408 I'll take one too !!

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

@Gibboanxious Manhattan

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

@anishmoonka Pretty sure what he meant there was he never would work with Netflix directly and as a primary distributor. His films have ended up on Netflix before.

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

@lizinterrupted He’s gettin best actor next year so it’s all good

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

@TomCruise I'll be there Tom!!

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

One of the all time great credit rolls

[All Things Movies @ThatMoviePage]

"It's only a teen comedy, no need to do anything cool with the end titles"

10 Things I Hate About You:

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

@UFCRosterWatch What you say might be true but the UFC also wanted to put on Ronda vs. Carano Dec. 2025 and they also tried to get Nate back. So what you criticize MVP for doing is something the UFC tried to do but couldn’t.

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

@tedcruz Do you even watch movies?

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

This film has a very special place in my heart. One of the great cinematic experiences of my childhood. The rain soaked New York City is a character unto itself and remains a joy to watch

[cinesthetic. @TheCinesthetic]

Godzilla (1998) remains a strange outlier in the franchise. Roland Emmerich treats it like a 90s disaster movie first and a kaiju film second, which is exactly why it still has its own cult following.

[Jason D Beck @JasonBeck82]

We have been VERY busy at the @BCSportsHall in recent months: https://t.co/PNEy5fcNCR

Thanks to @jonvhernandez from @CBCVancouver for stopping by yesterday to cover our artifact collection move!

[The Curious Tales @thecurioustales]

There are 7 billion versions of Earth right now. One for every human nervous system rendering it.

Yes, your brain has never once, in your entire life, shown you the world as it actually is.

Every single thing you've ever seen, touched, smelled, or believed was real?
A construction. A highly convincing hallucination assembled inside roughly 1.4 kg of electrochemical tissue that has never directly touched reality and never will.

The deeper implication of this runs so far beyond philosophy that most people stop engaging with it the moment it starts threatening their comfortable assumptions. So let's go there anyway.

Neuroscientist Anil Seth calls conscious experience a "controlled hallucination." But that framing still doesn't fully land for most people because we treat the word hallucination as a malfunction — something that happens to people who are unwell.

Strip that stigma away and what remains is staggering: the brain iis a prediction engine. It doesn't wait for sensory data to arrive and then interpret it. It generates a model of what it expects to be there, sends that model out ahead of incoming signals, and then only updates when the prediction errors become too loud to ignore.

You are, at all times, living approximately 80 milliseconds in the past — and inside a story your brain wrote before your eyes even opened.

The color red you see isn't in the apple. The apple emits no redness. Photons at roughly 700 nanometers enter your eye, stimulate certain cone cells, and your visual cortex translates that signal into a subjective experience your particular nervous system calls red.

Someone with different cone receptors — or a mantis shrimp with sixteen photoreceptor types compared to your three — inhabits a genuinely different visual universe while looking at the exact same apple. Neither is seeing "the real apple." Both are seeing what their biology decided was worth rendering.

The philosopher Thomas Nagel once asked what it is like to be a bat.

The question sounds playful until you realize he was pointing at something structurally thought provoking:

"there is no view from nowhere."

Every consciousness has a species-specific, individual-specific interface with reality. And interfaces, by definition, are not the thing itself. A GUI on your computer shows you folders and icons. Behind it is machine code, electrical states, binary operations — none of which look anything like the folders. The interface was designed for usability, not transparency.

Your perceptual system was designed for survival, not truth.

Evolution rewarded useful perception. Ancestors who correctly modeled a rustling bush as a predator — even when it wasn't — survived longer than those who needed certainty before reacting. The bias toward false positives is baked into your biology. Which means you are structurally, neurologically, evolutionarily inclined to see threats, patterns, and meanings that may have no basis in external reality. Your anxiety isn't irrational. It's an overactive survival interface interpreting a modern world through ancient rendering software.

Donald Hoffman, a cognitive scientist at UC Irvine, spent years building mathematical models to test whether accurate perception of reality would confer evolutionary advantages. His conclusion: organisms tuned to perceive reality as it actually is consistently lose, in evolutionary simulations, to organisms tuned to perceive fitness-relevant information. Seeing the truth is expensive. Seeing what keeps you alive is efficient. So that's what got selected for — relentlessly, across millions of years.

What you're left with is a species that experiences a seamlessly rendered simulation of reality and has almost no intuitive access to the machinery generating it.

And yet, the simulation is consistent enough across human nervous systems that we built civilization inside it. We agreed, implicitly, on what tables feel like and what gravity does and what fire means. Shared hallucination became culture, became language, became science — which is, ironically, the only tool we've developed precise enough to start revealing the hallucination for what it is.

Meditation practitioners figured out a version of this without the neuroscience. Sit still long enough and observe the contents of your mind without identifying with them, and the constructed nature of experience starts to become viscerally apparent. Thoughts arise. The sense of "I" that seems to be watching them also arises. The boundary between self and world — which feels so absolute in ordinary waking life — starts to look like another rendering decision, not a metaphysical fact.

The self is part of the simulation too.

Most people stop at the philosophical discomfort this creates and retreat back into practical reality — bills to pay, emails to answer, a life to live inside the model.

That's fine. Functional. But there's a version of absorbing this that produces something closer to radical humility.

If your perception is an interface, your beliefs about other people are low-resolution renders.

Your certainty about what someone meant, what they intended, who they are — all of it filtered through a system that prioritizes your survival narrative over their actual inner life. Every conflict you've ever had lived, at least partly, inside mismatched simulations that neither party could fully step outside of.

Every opinion you hold with absolute confidence was formed by a brain that has never once had unmediated access to the thing it formed an opinion about.

That doesn't make truth impossible. It makes humility the only honest starting point.

W e live so deep inside the map that most people die never having questioned whether the territory looks anything like what they spent their whole life navigating.

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

@LTGetsPolitical Found where the quote came from. I’d say the reporter skirts around asking White directly about the UFC’s overt affiliation with the Trump Administration and the message it sends to the fanbase

[Championship Rounds @ChampRDS]

Dana White isn’t worried about politics driving fans away from the UFC:

“How about you be authentic and just be yourself? You don’t have to agree with me, and you don’t have to like it… we can all still just get along.”

(via @CBSSunday)

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

@LTGetsPolitical Has anyone asked Dana directly if he thinks the UFC’s political affiliations could be alienating part of the fan base?

[Jon Hernandez @jonvhernandez]

@DovySimuMMA Last year of UFC’s ESPN broadcast deal vs. First year of WWE’s Netflix deal. I would expect UFC outperforms WWE substantially one year from now.