I help elite performers (organisations, musicians, athletes) cultivate the skills, mindsets and environments to do what matters most! Psych Prof @SussexUni
@livebricked@washingtonpost Wondering if you could help, I ordered a Brick a few weeks ago with 2 day express post but it still hasn't arrived. Any help would be great thanks!
@roropsych Be cool to hear your thoughts when you do, my PhD was rooted in that world so be curious to know what you think especially since you seem to do so much work with animals
@roropsych I found this too when admin were shocked many PhD students were getting A to A+s in my stats class. If students learn to apply and conduct analyses well, there's little barrier to getting higher grades. TBH I see that as a pro. Might be worth asking them to report in APA style
@byrd_nick Very cool a huge amount of my research and practise is inspired by people like Dreyfus (and Heidegger, Merleau Ponty etc.). Looking forward to reading your take!
@byrd_nick Interesting take! I see it as a cool construct but 6 has an almost circular logic (strong guilty evidence + other info = guilty verdict), can be interpreted in a few ways (e.g., the prioritisation you read into it), + it's a compound statement (which is usually psychometric hell)
@myACBS Very interesting. The main headline is cool either way, but it'd be really interesting to know if it's really one path rather than two as the CFQ and AAQ-II are psychometrically almost one!