@krmurphy22@WGR550_Patron That’s why Ottawa dealt him for Barrasso. But then Tugnutt’s Penguins playoff run with a league leading 1.77 playoff GAA and .945 SVP begged to differ.
@SensFaninYYC@kanesens7@TEEJAYSENS I guess that is what Ullmark is saying about last night too using your reasoning. Played a good game but those 3 goals, well they were the difference.
@SensFaninYYC@kanesens7@TEEJAYSENS Nobody is asking for an award. Everyone is telling you that the reason the Sens lost was not because of those two goals he let in. There’s way more to winning/losing a hockey game than scrutinizing the goalie. Learn the game, you clearly don’t know it well.
@SensFaninYYC@kanesens7@TEEJAYSENS That’s literally an oxymoron. You can back peddle and say “he played a good game” but he let in two bad goals that cost the game. If he let in two bad goals that cost the game, then he didn’t play a good game.
They weren’t bad goals though so your entire argument is ridiculous.
@SensFaninYYC@kanesens7@TEEJAYSENS Yes that’s right. If the Sens dominate the game, Ullmark makes no key saves to keep them in the game and then gives up two flukey goals, it’s absolutely a different conversation. That’s not what happened though. Not even close.
@SensFaninYYC@kanesens7@TEEJAYSENS Here are facts. Ullmark stopped 27 of 29 including 8 high danger pure robberies that most nights nobody’s stopping. The Sens were outplayed, outchanced and undisciplined. The team lost the game. Ullmark was the Sens best player yesterday not the reason they lost.
@SensFaninYYC@kanesens7@TEEJAYSENS They weren’t bad goals they were unlucky. A deflection from a shot in the slot and an another that he initially saved, got a couple bad bounces off of and then it ends up in the net - are not soft goals. No spin. That’s fact.
@SensFaninYYC@kanesens7@TEEJAYSENS What about the 8 saves he had no business making? If we are doing hypotheticals. Sure give him those two flukey goals as needed saves. How does your logic explain the others? Or unless your goalie plays a perfect game, it’s the goalie’s fault? Thats not hockey man.
@SensFaninYYC@kanesens7@TEEJAYSENS Again, Ullmark’s goals weren’t soft, they were unlucky. Meanwhile Andersen was extremely lucky with favourable bounces and falling over and having the puck luckily hit him.
Secondly, the Sens didn’t have remotely close to the same amount or quality of chances to even test him.
@SensFaninYYC@kanesens7@TEEJAYSENS The Sens lost this game because they got our chanced and they were undisciplined. It was a closer game than it looked because of goaltending. But either way in game 2 Ullmark doesn’t change a thing. The team in front of him needs to.
@SensFaninYYC@kanesens7@TEEJAYSENS You’re acting like two unlucky sequences erase everything else. That’s not how goaltending works. He made multiple high-danger saves that kept it close. That’s his job. And the bigger point, Ottawa scored zero. Also from some
unlucky bounces and calls.
@SensFaninYYC@kanesens7@TEEJAYSENS The fact is even if Ullmark had better puck luck on those two freak goals, the Sens still aren’t winning because they didn’t score. Neither goal was soft, they were just unlucky. In fact the entire game was one of those “Sens have no luck”today games.
@ivanthegrave@rastokke@dylanwiliam It’s not either or. It’s all connected. Education in Finland is built on equity, low stress, and trust in teachers. That shapes how people experience school, work, and society. Education is one of the foundations that feeds into that broader stability.