@narindertweets Was this the party that likes to advocate free speech, but when the lady voiced her opinion using her right to free speech, they didn't like it so attacked her, so is it only free speech when reform members want to use it
@Nigel_Farage Is this the same free speech the lady had at your party conference voiced her opinion and people didn't ike what she had to say so they beat her up, or is it only free speech if reform activists say it and support it.
@exile_1991@petermac23 In the picture you can clearly see two hands gripping ballards shirt, Ballard full focused on the ball, they both end up on the floor due to the holding so it's a foul and correct decision is a penalty
@talkSPORT So holding Ballard with two hands from behind is not a impeding/holding offence, when Ballard tried to change direction they both ended up on the floor with the arsenal player on top of him, out us foul for impeding/holding in the box , penalty is the correct decision
@sunechosafc Holding the player from behind with two hands on his chest pulling down is a foul, Ballard tried to change direction and couldn't hence they both ended up on the floor with the arsenal player on top of him so it's a foul and penalty
@Scottwilsonecho So holding a player from behind with two hands on his chest pulling him down is not an impeding/holding offence, Ballard tried to change direction and couldn't as he was being held hence they both ended up on the floor with the arsenal player on top of him.
@RobertJenrick It's like reforms catchphrase of "stop the boats" jenrick and co were in a conservative government and didn't stop the boats, again lining his own pockets like most MPs and councillors around the country self gain over anything else.
@RobertJenrick So the political party and councillors of that party that encourages and wants free speech has decided that they don't like what someone has said, so is it only free speech if they agree to what's being said, because that's how it looks.
@VisionTwizzle The moment a message says "and this is genuinely me asking and I haven't been hacked" the alarm bells would be ringing that they've been hacked or a false account.
@JamieArm2003@westhamsam27 Like you said when sainz done it you could clearly see the saliva, in this incudent you can't see anything happen, so because he has tried to get the player sent off he should get a retrospective ban for at least 3 games.
@JamieArm2003@Rufus_45 I've seen it, yes it's a red card but because of all the crying last week and saying pro ref want to give man city the title he should get a 5 game ban for it