@SophyRidgeSky Why not just mandate children’s only smart phones and make regular ones 16+
This does more safeguarding without any of the data concerns
Or is it what everyone already knows and this is nothing to do with protecting children it’s just mass surveillance
@theweb3jess@signalapp@depressivehacks Children’s only smart phones with limited features you can’t verify your way around
But this option doesn’t give out massive government contracts or track everyone
@el_obisesan Why would anyone be against mass surveillance?
No idea?
They could just have kids only phones that don’t need any of this but yes there’s no money in government contracts in that
@ShabanaMahmood ‘All adults will be able to switch off protections?’
Why not mandate children’s phones and avoid all this? Is it because then you won’t be able to do mass surveillance?
@mh19781978@Read_Meee Aaaaaaa now how she actually got treatment makes sense
What she described is a 9 month wait minimum and even then would have probably just sent her home
@Read_Meee Not a fucking chance this is true
I spent 7 years waiting for treatment back and forth with a urologist before they just took me off their lists for missing appointments that they cancelled
@ShabanaMahmood My 12 year old daughter can get around age verification quicker than I can do it legitimately
How to do it was passed around her entire secondary school within a day
The only thing this will do is track all the adults that have to put in all of their personal details